Search | SciELO

Resumo Objetivo Avaliar e comparar as fórmulas CKD-EPI, BIS1 e MDRD e o limiar diagnóstico de 45 e 60 ml/min/1,73m2 em pacientes idosos. Método Estudo observacional do tipo transversal, de caráter descritivo e analítico. Foram incluídos pacientes atendidos em ambulatório de referência entre janeiro/2020 e junho/2022, com idade ≥65 anos. Foram excluídos pacientes com apenas uma dosagem de creatinina ou com alterações transitórias da TFG. Resultados Observou-se que entre o grupo de pacientes com idade entre 65-74 anos e 75-84 anos as estimativas da TFG feitas pela fórmula CKD-EPI foram superiores às fórmulas BIS1 e MDRD. Enquanto, no grupo de pacientes com 85-94 anos a CKD-EPI não apresentou diferença quando comparada com MDRD, permaneceu com estimativas maiores apenas quando comparada com a BIS1. Observamos maior dispersão entre CKD-EPI e BIS1, mostrando menor concordância entre essas fórmulas, confirmada pelo teste Kappa (76,7%) e a concordância quase perfeita entre CKD-EPI e MDRD. Conclusão A fórmula BIS1 apresentou melhor correlação da diminuição da TFGe conforme o avanço das faixas etárias, podendo-se relacionar com o processo de envelhecimento renal fisiológico, podendo ser uma ferramenta auxiliar na estimativa da TFG em idosos, auxiliando no diagnóstico mais preciso da DRC, assim como, no planejamento de intervenções que possam retardar a progressão da DRC e prever risco de mortalidade por doenças cardiovasculares. CKDEPI, CKDEPI CKD EPI, EPI BIS 4 6 mlmin173m2 mlminm ml min 1 73m2 m ml/min/1,73m idosos transversal analítico janeiro2020 janeiro 2020 janeiro/202 junho2022 junho 2022 junho/2022 65 ≥6 Observouse Observou se 6574 74 65-7 7584 75 84 75-8 Enquanto 8594 85 94 85-9 76,7% 767 76 7 (76,7% etárias podendose fisiológico como cardiovasculares mlmin mlmin173m 73m janeiro202 202 janeiro/20 junho202 junho/202 ≥ 657 65- 758 8 75- 859 9 85- 76,7 (76,7 janeiro20 20 janeiro/2 junho20 junho/20 76, (76, janeiro2 2 janeiro/ junho2 junho/2 (76 junho/ (7 (

Abstract Objective To evaluate and compare the CKD-EPI, BIS1 and MDRD formulas and diagnostic thresholds of 45 and 60 ml/min/1.73m2 in older patients. Method A cross-sectional, descriptive, analytical observational study was conducted. Patients aged ≥65 years treated at a referral outpatient clinic between January 2020 and June 2022, were assessed. Patients with only one creatinine level or with transient GFR abnormalities were excluded. Results The GFR estimates using the CKD-EPI formula were higher than both the BIS1 and MDRD formulas in patient groups aged 65-74 years and 75-84 years. In the group of patients aged 85-94 years, the CKD-EPI showed no difference when compared with the MDRD, yielding higher estimates only compared with the BIS1. Greater dispersion was found between the CKD-EPI and BIS1, showing less agreement between these formulas, as confirmed by the Kappa test (76.7%), while there was almost perfect agreement between the CKD-EPI and MDRD. Conclusion The BIS1 formula showed stronger correlation of the decrease in eGFR with advancing age, reflecting the physiological renal aging process and serving as a potentially useful tool for estimating GFR in older adults. The formula can help provide a more accurate diagnosis of CKD and aid planning of interventions to slow the progression of CKD and predict the risk of mortality from cardiovascular diseases. CKDEPI, CKDEPI EPI, EPI BIS 4 6 mlmin173m2 mlminm ml min 1 73m2 m ml/min/1.73m crosssectional, crosssectional cross sectional, sectional cross-sectional descriptive conducted 65 ≥6 202 2022 assessed excluded 6574 74 65-7 7584 75 84 75-8 8594 85 94 85-9 76.7%, 767 76.7% , 76 7 (76.7%) age adults diseases mlmin mlmin173m 73m ≥ 20 657 65- 758 8 75- 859 9 85- 76.7 (76.7% 2 76. (76.7 (76. (76 (7 (

ABSTRACT The limited temporal completeness and taxonomic accuracy of species lists, made available in a traditional manner in scientific publications, has always represented a problem. These lists are invariably limited to a few taxonomic groups and do not represent up-to-date knowledge of all species and classifications. In this context, the Brazilian megadiverse fauna is no exception, and the Catálogo Taxonômico da Fauna do Brasil (CTFB) (http://fauna.jbrj.gov.br/), made public in 2015, represents a database on biodiversity anchored on a list of valid and expertly recognized scientific names of animals in Brazil. The CTFB is updated in near real time by a team of more than 800 specialists. By January 1, 2024, the CTFB compiled 133,691 nominal species, with 125,138 that were considered valid. Most of the valid species were arthropods (82.3%, with more than 102,000 species) and chordates (7.69%, with over 11,000 species). These taxa were followed by a cluster composed of Mollusca (3,567 species), Platyhelminthes (2,292 species), Annelida (1,833 species), and Nematoda (1,447 species). All remaining groups had less than 1,000 species reported in Brazil, with Cnidaria (831 species), Porifera (628 species), Rotifera (606 species), and Bryozoa (520 species) representing those with more than 500 species. Analysis of the CTFB database can facilitate and direct efforts towards the discovery of new species in Brazil, but it is also fundamental in providing the best available list of valid nominal species to users, including those in science, health, conservation efforts, and any initiative involving animals. The importance of the CTFB is evidenced by the elevated number of citations in the scientific literature in diverse areas of biology, law, anthropology, education, forensic science, and veterinary science, among others. publications problem uptodate up date classifications context exception (CTFB http//fauna.jbrj.gov.br/, httpfaunajbrjgovbr http //fauna.jbrj.gov.br/ , jbrj gov br (http://fauna.jbrj.gov.br/) 2015 Brazil 80 specialists 1 2024 133691 133 691 133,69 125138 125 138 125,13 82.3%, 823 82 3 (82.3% 102000 102 000 102,00 7.69%, 769 7 69 (7.69% 11000 11 11,00 . 3,567 3567 567 (3,56 2,292 2292 2 292 (2,29 1,833 1833 833 (1,83 1,447 1447 447 (1,44 1000 1,00 831 (83 628 (62 606 (60 520 (52 50 users science health biology law anthropology education others http//fauna.jbrj.gov.br/ faunajbrjgovbr //fauna.jbrj.gov.br (http://fauna.jbrj.gov.br/ 201 8 202 13369 13 133,6 12513 12 125,1 82.3% (82.3 10200 10 00 102,0 7.69% 76 6 (7.69 1100 11,0 3,56 356 56 (3,5 2,29 229 29 (2,2 1,83 183 83 (1,8 1,44 144 44 (1,4 100 1,0 (8 62 (6 60 52 (5 5 http//fauna.jbrj.gov.br (http://fauna.jbrj.gov.br 20 1336 133, 1251 125, 82.3 (82. 1020 0 102, 7.69 (7.6 110 11, 3,5 35 (3, 2,2 22 (2, 1,8 18 (1, 1,4 14 4 ( 82. (82 7.6 (7. 3, (3 2, (2 (1 7. (7

Chagas disease (CD) causes the highest burden of parasitic diseases in the Western Hemisphere and is therefore a priority for drug research and development. Platelet-activating factor (PAF) causes the CD parasite Trypanosoma cruzi to differentiate, which suggests that the parasite may express PAF receptors. Here, we explored the T. cruzi proteome for PAF receptor-like proteins. From a total of 23,000 protein sequences, we identified 29 hypothetical proteins that are predicted to have seven transmembrane domains (TMDs), which is the main characteristic of the G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), including the PAF receptor. The TMDs of these sequences were independently aligned with domains from 25 animal PAF receptors and the sequences were analysed for conserved residues. The conservation score mean values for the TMDs of the hypothetical proteins ranged from 31.7-44.1%, which suggests that if the putative T. cruzi PAF receptor is among the sequences identified, the TMDs are not highly conserved. These results suggest that T. cruzi contains several GPCR-like proteins and that one of these GPCRs may be a PAF receptor. Future studies may further validate the PAF receptor as a target for CD chemotherapy.

Index code	Element
ti	article title
au	author
kw	article keywords
subject	subject (title words, abstract and keywords)
ab	abstract
ta	journal short title (e.g. Cad. Saúde Pública)
journal_title	journal full title (e.g. Cadernos de Saúde Pública)
la	publication language code (e.g. pt - Portuguese, es - Spanish)
type	document type
pid	publication identifier
publication_year	publication year of publication
sponsor	sponsor
aff_country	country code of the author's affiliation
aff_institution	author affiliation institution
volume	article volume
issue	article issue
elocation	elocation
doi	DOI number
issn	journal ISSN
in	SciELO colection code (e.g. scl - Brasil, col - Colômbia)
use_license	article usage license code

No documents were found for your search