Search | SciELO

ABSTRACT The limited temporal completeness and taxonomic accuracy of species lists, made available in a traditional manner in scientific publications, has always represented a problem. These lists are invariably limited to a few taxonomic groups and do not represent up-to-date knowledge of all species and classifications. In this context, the Brazilian megadiverse fauna is no exception, and the Catálogo Taxonômico da Fauna do Brasil (CTFB) (http://fauna.jbrj.gov.br/), made public in 2015, represents a database on biodiversity anchored on a list of valid and expertly recognized scientific names of animals in Brazil. The CTFB is updated in near real time by a team of more than 800 specialists. By January 1, 2024, the CTFB compiled 133,691 nominal species, with 125,138 that were considered valid. Most of the valid species were arthropods (82.3%, with more than 102,000 species) and chordates (7.69%, with over 11,000 species). These taxa were followed by a cluster composed of Mollusca (3,567 species), Platyhelminthes (2,292 species), Annelida (1,833 species), and Nematoda (1,447 species). All remaining groups had less than 1,000 species reported in Brazil, with Cnidaria (831 species), Porifera (628 species), Rotifera (606 species), and Bryozoa (520 species) representing those with more than 500 species. Analysis of the CTFB database can facilitate and direct efforts towards the discovery of new species in Brazil, but it is also fundamental in providing the best available list of valid nominal species to users, including those in science, health, conservation efforts, and any initiative involving animals. The importance of the CTFB is evidenced by the elevated number of citations in the scientific literature in diverse areas of biology, law, anthropology, education, forensic science, and veterinary science, among others. publications problem uptodate up date classifications context exception (CTFB http//fauna.jbrj.gov.br/, httpfaunajbrjgovbr http //fauna.jbrj.gov.br/ , jbrj gov br (http://fauna.jbrj.gov.br/) 2015 Brazil 80 specialists 1 2024 133691 133 691 133,69 125138 125 138 125,13 82.3%, 823 82 3 (82.3% 102000 102 000 102,00 7.69%, 769 7 69 (7.69% 11000 11 11,00 . 3,567 3567 567 (3,56 2,292 2292 2 292 (2,29 1,833 1833 833 (1,83 1,447 1447 447 (1,44 1000 1,00 831 (83 628 (62 606 (60 520 (52 50 users science health biology law anthropology education others http//fauna.jbrj.gov.br/ faunajbrjgovbr //fauna.jbrj.gov.br (http://fauna.jbrj.gov.br/ 201 8 202 13369 13 133,6 12513 12 125,1 82.3% (82.3 10200 10 00 102,0 7.69% 76 6 (7.69 1100 11,0 3,56 356 56 (3,5 2,29 229 29 (2,2 1,83 183 83 (1,8 1,44 144 44 (1,4 100 1,0 (8 62 (6 60 52 (5 5 http//fauna.jbrj.gov.br (http://fauna.jbrj.gov.br 20 1336 133, 1251 125, 82.3 (82. 1020 0 102, 7.69 (7.6 110 11, 3,5 35 (3, 2,2 22 (2, 1,8 18 (1, 1,4 14 4 ( 82. (82 7.6 (7. 3, (3 2, (2 (1 7. (7

O objetivo deste trabalho é identificar as características relacionadas à qualidade em serviços que atendem à saúde da mulher na perspectiva de profissionais de vigilância sanitária (Visa) e de coordenadores de saúde da mulher (CSM) de municípios. Trata-se de um estudo de abordagem qualitativa, efetuado por meio de entrevistas semiestruturadas. Foram selecionadas três capitais brasileiras e entrevistados três sujeitos de cada capital - um responsável e um técnico da área de Visa em serviços de saúde e um CSM. A análise das entrevistas foi realizada pela técnica de análise de conteúdo, organizando as respostas em categorias temáticas baseadas no modelo de avaliação dos serviços de saúde de Donabedian: estrutura, processos e resultados. Os técnicos de Visa relataram com maior frequência aspectos relacionados à estrutura dos serviços de saúde, como equipamentos e recursos humanos qualificados. Os responsáveis pela Visa citaram aspectos relacionados à estrutura e aos processos como priorização no atendimento. Os CSM abordaram as três categorias, com destaque para os processos. As entrevistas apontam para um possível prejuízo na avaliação por resultados. O estudo reforça a necessidade de atuação conjunta entre os setores de vigilância e assistência, a fim de promover a qualidade nos serviços.

The scope of this work is to identify the characteristics relating to the quality of women's healthcare services from the perspective of the sanitary vigilance professionals (Visa) and women's healthcare coordinators (CSM) in the municipalities. It is a study with a qualitative approach that was carried out using semi-structured interviews. Three Brazilian state capitals were selected and three individuals in each capital were interviewed, namely a Visa healthcare service chief, as well as a technician, and a CSM coordinator. The content analysis technique was adopted to organize the data and the answers were grouped into the healthcare service evaluation topics based on Donabedian's model, i.e. structure, processes, and outcomes. Visa workers reported aspects related to the structure of health services, such as equipment and qualified human resources more frequently. The Visa chief mentioned aspects related to structure and processes, such as prioritization in attendance. The CWH coordinator examined all three categories, especially processes. Analysis of interviews points to a potential distortion in evaluation by results. The study highlights the need for joint action between the surveillance and assistance sectors to improve the quality of services.

Index code	Element
ti	article title
au	author
kw	article keywords
subject	subject (title words, abstract and keywords)
ab	abstract
ta	journal short title (e.g. Cad. Saúde Pública)
journal_title	journal full title (e.g. Cadernos de Saúde Pública)
la	publication language code (e.g. pt - Portuguese, es - Spanish)
type	document type
pid	publication identifier
publication_year	publication year of publication
sponsor	sponsor
aff_country	country code of the author's affiliation
aff_institution	author affiliation institution
volume	article volume
issue	article issue
elocation	elocation
doi	DOI number
issn	journal ISSN
in	SciELO colection code (e.g. scl - Brasil, col - Colômbia)
use_license	article usage license code

No documents were found for your search