OBJECTIVE: To compare compensatory sweating after lowering or restricting the level of sympathectomy. METHOD: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted of all randomized controlled trials published in English that compared compensatory sweating after lowering or restricting the level of sympathectomy. The Cochrane collaboration tool was used to assess the risk of bias, and the Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio method was used for the meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 11 randomized controlled trials were included, including a total of 1079 patients. Five of the randomized controlled trials studied restricting the level of sympathectomy, and the remaining six studied lowering the level of sympathectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The compiled randomized controlled trial results published so far in the literature do not support the claims that lowering or restricting the level of sympathetic ablation results in less compensatory sweating.

OBJETIVO: Reinternações frequentes por exacerbações agudas da DPOC (EADPOC) são um fator de risco independente para maior mortalidade e uso de recursos de saúde. A gravidade da doença e o nível de proteína C reativa (PCR) são preditores validados do prognóstico em longo prazo para tais pacientes. Investigamos a utilidade da combinação do nível sérico de PCR com a classificação de risco de exacerbação da Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) para predizer a reinternação por EADPOC. MÉTODOS: Estudo observacional prospectivo de pacientes consecutivos hospitalizados por EADPOC no Peking University Third Hospital, in Pequim, China. Avaliamos a idade; gênero, história e carga tabágicas (anos-maço), função pulmonar, frequência de EADPOC no último ano; qualidade de vida; categoria de risco GOLD (A-D, D indicando maior risco); e nível sérico de PCR de alta sensibilidade na alta (PCRas-A). RESULTADOS: A amostra final consistiu em 135 pacientes. Desses, 71 (52,6%) foram reinternados ao menos uma vez durante o período de seguimento de 12 meses. A mediana (intervalo interquartílico) do tempo de reinternação foi de 78 dias (42-178 dias). A análise multivariada revelou que PCRas-A sérico ≥ 3 mg/L e categoria GOLD D foram preditores independentes de reinternação (razão de risco = 3,486; IC95%: 1,968-6,175; p < 0,001 e razão de risco = 2,201; IC95%: 1,342-3,610; p = 0,002, respectivamente). A ordem das combinações dos fatores por risco cumulativo de readmissão, da maior para a menor foi a seguinte: PCRas-A ≥ 3 mg/L e categoria GOLD D; PCRas-A ≥ 3 mg/L e categorias GOLD A-C; PCRas-A < 3 mg/L e categoria GOLD D; e PCRas-A < 3 mg/L e categorias GOLD A-C. CONCLUSÕES: O nível sérico de PCRas-A e a classificação GOLD são preditores independentes de reinternação por EADPOC, e seu valor preditivo aumenta quanto usados conjuntamente.

OBJECTIVE: Frequent readmissions for acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) are an independent risk factor for increased mortality and use of health-care resources. Disease severity and C-reactive protein (CRP) level are validated predictors of long-term prognosis in such patients. This study investigated the utility of combining serum CRP level with the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) exacerbation risk classification for predicting readmission for AECOPD. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of consecutive patients hospitalized for AECOPD at Peking University Third Hospital, in Beijing, China. We assessed patient age; gender; smoking status and history (pack-years); lung function; AECOPD frequency during the last year; quality of life; GOLD risk category (A-D; D indicating the greatest risk); and serum level of high-sensitivity CRP at discharge (hsCRP-D). RESULTS: The final sample comprised 135 patients. Of those, 71 (52.6%) were readmitted at least once during the 12-month follow-up period. The median (interquartile) time to readmission was 78 days (42-178 days). Multivariate analysis revealed that serum hsCRP-D ≥ 3 mg/L and GOLD category D were independent predictors of readmission (hazard ratio = 3.486; 95% CI: 1.968-6.175; p < 0.001 and hazard ratio = 2.201; 95% CI: 1.342-3.610; p = 0.002, respectively). The ordering of the factor combinations by cumulative readmission risk, from highest to lowest, was as follows: hsCRP-D ≥ 3 mg/L and GOLD category D; hsCRP-D ≥ 3 mg/L and GOLD categories A-C; hsCRP-D < 3 mg/L and GOLD category D; hsCRP-D < 3 mg/L and GOLD categories A-C. CONCLUSIONS: Serum hsCRP-D and GOLD classification are independent predictors of readmission for AECOPD, and their predictive value increases when they are used in combination.