Resumo Este estudo pretende identificar a prevalência de interações medicamentosas potenciais (IMP) em idosos institucionalizados e seus fatores associados. Realizamos um estudo observacional, multicêntrico e transversal, durante o último trimestre de 2010. Selecionamos uma amostra de 275 sujeitos (≥ 65 anos) de 10 instituições para idosos de Murcia (Espanha) mediante amostragem aleatória complexa em duas etapas. As IMP foram identificadas usando a base de dados do College of Pharmacists. Estimamos a prevalência de IMP de relevância clínica e analisamos os fatores associados com análise de regressão uni e multinível. Identificamos 210 IMP, das quais 120 foram consideradas clinicamente relevantes (57,1%) e afetaram 70 idosos (25,8%). Oito grupos farmacológicos constituíram 70,2% das IMP clinicamente relevantes. A prevalência de IMP esteve associada à multimorbidade (OR = 2,3; IC 95% = 1,4-4,5) e tomar dez ou mais medicamentos diariamente (OR = 9,6; IC95% = 4,8-19,1) e uso de medicamentos anti-inflamatórios (OR = 3,9; IC 95% = 1,4-10,4). Este estudo revela que as IMP clinicamente relevantes são muito comuns em idosos institucionalizados e que os serviços devem melhorar seus processos para reduzir a prevalência deste fenômeno.

Abstract This study purposes to determine the prevalence of potential and clinical relevant Drug-Drug-Interactions (pDDIs) in institutionalized older adults and to identify the pertinent factors associated. We conduct an observational, multicenter and cross-sectional study during the last quarter of 2010. We selected a sample of 275 subjects (aged ≥ 65 years) from 10 nursing homes of Murcia (Spain) by a two-stage complex sampling. pDDIs were identified using the College of Pharmacists Database. We only considered pDDIs of clinical relevance, and thereafter the relevant factors were identified through uni-level and multi-level regression analyses. A total of 210 pDDIs were identified, 120 of which were considered clinically relevant (57.1%), affecting a total of 70 elderly (25.8%). Eight pharmacological groups made up 70.2% of the clinically relevant pDDIs. More clinically relevant DDIs were found in people suffering several pathologies (OR = 2.3; 95%CI = 1.4-4.5), and also in people who take ten or more drugs daily (OR = 9.6; 95%CI = 4.8-19.1), and people who take anti-inflammatory drugs (OR = 3.9; 95%CI = 1.4-10.4). This study reveals that clinically relevant pDDIs are very common in institutionalized elderly people, and that caregivers should aim at improving their practice in order to reduce the prevalence of this phenomenon.

Resumo Este estudo pretende identificar a prevalência de interações medicamentosas potenciais (IMP) em idosos institucionalizados e seus fatores associados. Realizamos um estudo observacional, multicêntrico e transversal, durante o último trimestre de 2010. Selecionamos uma amostra de 275 sujeitos (≥ 65 anos) de 10 instituições para idosos de Murcia (Espanha) mediante amostragem aleatória complexa em duas etapas. As IMP foram identificadas usando a base de dados do College of Pharmacists. Estimamos a prevalência de IMP de relevância clínica e analisamos os fatores associados com análise de regressão uni e multinível. Identificamos 210 IMP, das quais 120 foram consideradas clinicamente relevantes (57,1%) e afetaram 70 idosos (25,8%). Oito grupos farmacológicos constituíram 70,2% das IMP clinicamente relevantes. A prevalência de IMP esteve associada à multimorbidade (OR = 2,3; IC 95% = 1,4-4,5) e tomar dez ou mais medicamentos diariamente (OR = 9,6; IC95% = 4,8-19,1) e uso de medicamentos anti-inflamatórios (OR = 3,9; IC 95% = 1,4-10,4). Este estudo revela que as IMP clinicamente relevantes são muito comuns em idosos institucionalizados e que os serviços devem melhorar seus processos para reduzir a prevalência deste fenômeno.

Abstract This study purposes to determine the prevalence of potential and clinical relevant Drug-Drug-Interactions (pDDIs) in institutionalized older adults and to identify the pertinent factors associated. We conduct an observational, multicenter and cross-sectional study during the last quarter of 2010. We selected a sample of 275 subjects (aged ≥ 65 years) from 10 nursing homes of Murcia (Spain) by a two-stage complex sampling. pDDIs were identified using the College of Pharmacists Database. We only considered pDDIs of clinical relevance, and thereafter the relevant factors were identified through uni-level and multi-level regression analyses. A total of 210 pDDIs were identified, 120 of which were considered clinically relevant (57.1%), affecting a total of 70 elderly (25.8%). Eight pharmacological groups made up 70.2% of the clinically relevant pDDIs. More clinically relevant DDIs were found in people suffering several pathologies (OR = 2.3; 95%CI = 1.4-4.5), and also in people who take ten or more drugs daily (OR = 9.6; 95%CI = 4.8-19.1), and people who take anti-inflammatory drugs (OR = 3.9; 95%CI = 1.4-10.4). This study reveals that clinically relevant pDDIs are very common in institutionalized elderly people, and that caregivers should aim at improving their practice in order to reduce the prevalence of this phenomenon.

ABSTRACT Background: Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used but they increase the risk of gastrointestinal haemorrage among other adverse effects. The objective of this study was to compare potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) by NSAIDs using the original Beers Criteria, a global reference for evaluating elderly people’s prescriptions, and the Spanish adaptation of the same; and the relation between PIM of NSAIDs and gastrointestinal bleeding. Methods: The study was a retrospective observational study carried out located in a primary care district in the province of de Murcia, south-eastern Spain. The study population (n=7.856) were citizens aged 65 and above, with at least one drug prescribed in a Spanish health district during the study period . We analized illnesses and treatments registered in the primary care’s electronic medical history of patients and hospital admissions, during the 12 month study period (2012). The original Beers Criteria and their Spanish adaptation were used to evaluate PIM of NSAIDs in patients considering the medication globally and also each active substance. Gastrointestinal bleeding events recorded in the data bases studied were evaluated. Results: Detection of PIM of NSAIDs was 5,6% with the original version and 7,0% (Δ=25,5%; p<0,001) with the adapted one. PIM of NSAIDs was related with an increased incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding without significant differences between PIM exposed and NSAID exposed patients AINE (RR=1,6; IC:0,2-14,5). Conclusions: The Spanish adaptation of the Beers criteria identified a greater degree of PIM of NSAIDs than the original version, and in both versions the detection of PIM was not related with a significant increase of gastrointestinal bleeding compared to patients exposed to NSAIDs.

RESUMEN Fundamentos: Los Antiinflamatorios No Esteroideos (AINE) son un grupo de medicamentos con uso muy extendido en la población, su uso genera un mayor riesgo de hemorragia digestiva. El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar y comparar la prescripción potencialmente inadecuada (PPI) de AINE según los criterios de Beers en su versión original con su adaptación española y la relación de esta PPI con los eventos de sangrado gastrointestinal. Métodos: Estudio observacional longitudinal retrospectivo de 12 meses (año 2012) realizado en un área de salud de la Región de Murcia. La población estudiada fue los mayores de 65 años a los que se les había prescrito, al menos, 1 receta médica de AINE durante el periodo de estudio (7.856). Se utilizaron ambas versiones de los criterios de Beers para evaluar la PPI por AINE. Para evaluar el papel etiológico de la exposición a AINE potencialmente inadecuados, respecto a haber recibido AINE, en la hemorragia gastrointestinal se calculó la incidencia acumulada y el Riesgo Relativo. Resultados: La detección de PPI por AINE pasó de 5,6% con la versión original, a 7,0% (Δ=25,5%; p<0,001) En los sujetos con prescripción de AINE la exposición a PPI por AINE presentó una mayor incidencia de sangrado gastrointestinal pero sin diferencias significativas respecto a la población que recibió AINE (RR=1,6; IC:0,2-14,5). Conclusiones: El uso de la adaptación española de los criterios de Beers posibilita una mayor detección de PPI por AINE en comparación con el uso de la versión original, en ambas versiones, la PPI por AINE no genera un incremento significativo en el sangrado gastrointestinal respecto a recibir AINE.

ABSTRACT Background: Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used but they increase the risk of gastrointestinal haemorrage among other adverse effects. The objective of this study was to compare potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) by NSAIDs using the original Beers Criteria, a global reference for evaluating elderly people’s prescriptions, and the Spanish adaptation of the same; and the relation between PIM of NSAIDs and gastrointestinal bleeding. Methods: The study was a retrospective observational study carried out located in a primary care district in the province of de Murcia, south-eastern Spain. The study population (n=7.856) were citizens aged 65 and above, with at least one drug prescribed in a Spanish health district during the study period . We analized illnesses and treatments registered in the primary care’s electronic medical history of patients and hospital admissions, during the 12 month study period (2012). The original Beers Criteria and their Spanish adaptation were used to evaluate PIM of NSAIDs in patients considering the medication globally and also each active substance. Gastrointestinal bleeding events recorded in the data bases studied were evaluated. Results: Detection of PIM of NSAIDs was 5,6% with the original version and 7,0% (Δ=25,5%; p<0,001) with the adapted one. PIM of NSAIDs was related with an increased incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding without significant differences between PIM exposed and NSAID exposed patients AINE (RR=1,6; IC:0,2-14,5). Conclusions: The Spanish adaptation of the Beers criteria identified a greater degree of PIM of NSAIDs than the original version, and in both versions the detection of PIM was not related with a significant increase of gastrointestinal bleeding compared to patients exposed to NSAIDs.

RESUMEN Fundamentos: Los Antiinflamatorios No Esteroideos (AINE) son un grupo de medicamentos con uso muy extendido en la población, su uso genera un mayor riesgo de hemorragia digestiva. El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar y comparar la prescripción potencialmente inadecuada (PPI) de AINE según los criterios de Beers en su versión original con su adaptación española y la relación de esta PPI con los eventos de sangrado gastrointestinal. Métodos: Estudio observacional longitudinal retrospectivo de 12 meses (año 2012) realizado en un área de salud de la Región de Murcia. La población estudiada fue los mayores de 65 años a los que se les había prescrito, al menos, 1 receta médica de AINE durante el periodo de estudio (7.856). Se utilizaron ambas versiones de los criterios de Beers para evaluar la PPI por AINE. Para evaluar el papel etiológico de la exposición a AINE potencialmente inadecuados, respecto a haber recibido AINE, en la hemorragia gastrointestinal se calculó la incidencia acumulada y el Riesgo Relativo. Resultados: La detección de PPI por AINE pasó de 5,6% con la versión original, a 7,0% (Δ=25,5%; p<0,001) En los sujetos con prescripción de AINE la exposición a PPI por AINE presentó una mayor incidencia de sangrado gastrointestinal pero sin diferencias significativas respecto a la población que recibió AINE (RR=1,6; IC:0,2-14,5). Conclusiones: El uso de la adaptación española de los criterios de Beers posibilita una mayor detección de PPI por AINE en comparación con el uso de la versión original, en ambas versiones, la PPI por AINE no genera un incremento significativo en el sangrado gastrointestinal respecto a recibir AINE.