RESUMO Objetivo: as recomendações das decisões em Tumor Board (TB) deveriam ser acompanhadas para identificar barreiras que possam interferir na execução do melhor cuidado para o paciente decidido previamente. O objetivo do estudo é avaliar se a decisão de conduta em TB foi realizada em pacientes com tumores pancreáticos, o status de vida 90 dias após TB e analisar os motivos pelos quais a conduta não foi realizada. Métodos: estudo retrospectivo com pacientes com tumores de pâncreas, avaliados entre 2017 a 2019. Dados epidemiológicos, se a conduta de TB foi realizada, o motivo da não realização, o status de vida em 90 dias após decisão de TB e quantas vezes cada paciente foi discutido em reunião foram coletados. As variáveis categóricas foram comparadas pelo teste de qui-quadrado; variáveis numéricas foram apresentadas como médias e desvio padrão. Resultados: 111 casos, 95 pacientes, 86 (90,5%) com diagnóstico de câncer. Após 90 dias de TB, 83 pacientes (87,37%) permaneceram vivos, 9 pacientes (9,47%) faleceram e 3 (3,16%) perderam o seguimento. A conduta do TB não foi realizada em 12 (10,8%) dos casos e os motivos foram: 25% (3) por perda de seguimento, 8,33% (1) por recusa do paciente e 66,67% (8) devido à piora clínica. Os casos de pacientes com metástases tiveram menor execução de conduta de TB (p=0,006). Conclusões: a conduta do TB é realizada na maior parte dos casos e o motivo mais evidente para o não cumprimento das condutas é a piora clínica do paciente.

ABSTRACT Objective: the recommendations of the decisions made by the Tumor Board (TB) should be followed to identify barriers that may interfere with the execution of the previously decided, best care for the patient. The aim of this study is to assess whether the TB conduct decision was performed in patients with pancreatic tumors, their life status 90 days after the TB decision, and to analyze the reasons why the conduct was not performed. Methods: we conducted a retrospective study with patients with pancreas tumors, evaluated between 2017 and 2019. We collected data on epidemiological status, whether the TB procedure was performed, the reason for not performing it, life status 90 days after the TB decision, and how many times each patient was discussed at a meeting. We compared categorical variables using the chi square test, numerical variables were presented as means and standard deviation. Results: we studied 111 session cases, in 95 patients, 86 (90.5%) diagnosed with cancer. After 90 days of TB, 83 patients (87.37%) remained alive, 9 had (9.47%) died, and 3 (3.16%) were lost to follow-up. The TB decision was not observed in 12 (10.8%) cases and the reasons were: 25% (3) for loss of follow-up, 8.33% (1) for patient refusal, and 66.67% (8) due to clinical worsening. The cases of patients with metastases had a lower rate of TB conduct compliance (p=0.006). Conclusions: the TB conduct was performed in most cases and the most evident reason for non-compliance with the conducts is the patient’s clinical worsening.

Approximately 30-40% of patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors present with carcinoid syndrome, which is a paraneoplastic syndrome associated with the secretion of several humoral factors. Carcinoid syndrome significantly and negatively affects patients’ quality of life; increases costs compared with the costs of nonfunctioning neuroendocrine tumors; and results in changes in patients’ lifestyle, such as diet, work, physical activity and social life. For several decades, patients with neuroendocrine tumors and carcinoid syndrome have been treated with somatostatin analogues as the first-line treatment. While these agents provide significant relief from carcinoid syndrome symptoms, there is inevitable clinical progression, and new therapeutic interventions are needed. More than 40 substances have been identified as being potentially related to carcinoid syndrome; however, their individual contributions in triggering different carcinoid symptoms or complications, such as carcinoid heart disease, remain unclear. These substances include serotonin (5-HT), which appears to be the primary marker associated with the syndrome, as well as histamine, kallikrein, prostaglandins, and tachykinins. Given the complexity involving the origin, diagnosis and management of patients with carcinoid syndrome, we have undertaken a comprehensive review to update information about the pathophysiology, diagnostic tools and treatment sequence of this syndrome, which currently comprises a multidisciplinary approach.

Noncolorectal gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies are among the most frequently diagnosed cancers. Despite the undeniable progress in systemic treatments in recent decades, further improvements using cytotoxic chemotherapy seem unlikely. In this setting, recent discoveries regarding the mechanism underlying immune evasion have prompted the study of molecules capable of inducing strong antitumor responses. Thus, according to early data, immunotherapy is a very promising tool for the treatment of patients with GI malignancies. Noncolorectal GI cancers are a major public health problem worldwide. Traditional treatment options, such as chemotherapy, surgery, radiation therapy, monoclonal antibodies and antiangiogenic agents, have been the backbone of treatment for various stages of GI cancers, but overall mortality remains a major problem. Thus, there is a substantial unmet need for new drugs and therapies to further improve the outcomes of treatment for noncolorectal GI malignancies. “Next-generation” immunotherapy is emerging as an effective and promising treatment option in several types of cancers. Therefore, encouraged by this recent success, many clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and other strategies in treating noncolorectal GI malignancies are ongoing. This review will summarize the current clinical progress of modern immunotherapy in the field of noncolorectal GI tumors.

Resumo Introdução: Alguns pacientes com diagnóstico de câncer utilizam terapias alternativas. Na era da internet, as informações podem se dissipar de forma rápida e abrangente, como foi o caso da fosfoetanolamina no Brasil, onde foi aclamada pela população como sendo a "cura para o câncer". Método: Trata-se de um estudo transversal desenvolvido pela Sociedade Brasileira de Oncologia Clínica (SBOC). Através de e-mail e SMS, enviou-se um questionário com perguntas objetivas para oncologistas membros ativos da SBOC. Os dados foram avaliados por meio de estatística descritiva. A significância estatística entre as variáveis foi testada pelo teste Qui-quadrado de Pearson (p<0,05 foi considerado significativo). Resultados: O questionário foi enviado para 1.072 oncologistas, tendo 398 (37,1%) respondido pelo menos parte dele. Cento e quinze (28,9%) tinham pacientes que fizeram uso da fosfoetanolamina. Desses, 14 (12,2%) observaram eventos adversos e quatro (3,5%) atribuíram benefício clínico para a substância. A maioria (n=331; 83,2%) acreditava que ela só deveria ser utilizada dentro de um ensaio clínico. A principal recomendação dada aos pacientes foi contra o seu uso (n=311; 78,1%). Oncologistas das regiões Sudeste, Sul e Centro-Oeste tiveram mais pacientes que tomaram a substância quando comparados com as regiões Norte e Nordeste. Conclusão: Este é o primeiro estudo que avalia a opinião dos oncologistas sobre essa terapia alternativa e sua experiência. A maioria dos oncologistas brasileiros não acredita que a fosfoetanolamina sintética seja ativa no tratamento do câncer, não recomendando seu uso sem avaliação adequada, e afirmam que a substância só deve estar disponível no contexto de ensaios clínicos.

Summary Introduction: Patients who are treating cancer have often used alternative therapies. In the internet era, information can be broadcasted widely, and this happened with phosphoethanolamine in Brazil, where this substance was claimed by the population to be the "cure for cancer." Method: This is a cross-sectional study developed by the Brazilian Society of Clinical Oncology (SBOC). An objectively structured questionnaire was sent by e-mail and SMS to active MDs members of the SBOC. Descriptive statistics was used to evaluate the data. Statistical significance between the variables was tested by Pearson's Chi-squared test (p<0.05 was considered significance). Results: The survey was sent to 1,072 oncologists, and 398 (37.1%) answered at least part of it. One hundred and fifteen (28.9%) had followed patients who had used phosphoethanolamine. Among these, 14 (12.2%) observed adverse events and four (3.5%) attributed clinical benefit to the substance. Most of the oncologists (n=331; 83.2%) believe that it should only be used as part of a clinical trial protocol. Most physicians did not recommend this drug to their patients (n=311; 78.1%). Oncologists in Southeast, South and Midwest Brazil were more likely to have patients taking the drug compared to the Northern and Northeastern regions. Conclusion: This is the first survey to assess the opinion and experience of oncologists about this alternative therapy. Most oncologists in Brazil do not believe that synthetic phosphoethanolamine is active in cancer treatment, do not recommend its use without proper evaluation, and state that it should only be available to patients in the context of clinical trials.

RESUMO O Grupo Brasileiro de Tumores Gastrointestinais desenvolveu diretrizes de tratamento cirúrgico e clínico de pacientes com tumores de vias biliares. O painel multidisciplinar foi composto de especialistas nas áreas radiologia, oncologia, cirurgia, radioterapia, endoscopia e anatomia patológica. O painel utilizou literatura atual para desenvolver recomendações baseadas em evidência científica para as diferentes estratégias terapêuticas e diagnósticas dos colangiocarcinomas e tumores de vesícula biliar.

ABSTRACT The Brazilian Gastrointestinal Tumor Group developed guidelines for the surgical and clinical management of patients with billiary cancers. The multidisciplinary panel was composed of experts in the field of radiology, medical oncology, surgical oncology, radiotherapy, endoscopy and pathology. The panel utilized the most recent literature to develop a series of evidence-based recommendations on different treatment and diagnostic strategies for cholangiocarcinomas and gallbladder cancers.

OBJECTIVES:Colorectal cancer is the third leading cause of cancer death in the United States. The American College of Gastroenterology recommends screening for first-degree relatives of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer before the age of 50. A colonoscopy is one of the most commonly recommended exams due to its specificity and the possibility to resect pre-malignant lesions. Nevertheless, the rate of physician adherence to this recommendation is unknown.METHODS:This transversal study was performed at a major cancer center in Brazil with 62 patients, aged 18 to 50, who completed a questionnaire on information received from their physicians regarding screening their first-degree relatives. We used the answers from patients who provided explicit consent.RESULTS:Two hundred and three patients were eligible to participate and 93 (45.8%) agreed to complete the questionnaire. Twenty-three questionnaires (24.73%) were returned and 39 were completed by telephone. Of the patients who answered the questionnaire, 39 (62.9%) had received a colonoscopy recommendation for their first-degree relatives and 23 (37.1%) were not informed of the recommendation. Among the patients who received the recommendations, 20.51% affirmed that all relatives completed the exam and 51.28% stated that no relatives completed the exam.DISCUSSION:The adherence rate of our physicians to the ACG guideline recommendations was 62.9%. Considering that our study was performed at a leading center for cancer treatment in Latin America, we had expected better adherence. The results show that adherence to the colorectal cancer screening recommendations for high-risk patients must be improved.

A fadiga relacionada ao câncer (FRC) é um dos sintomas mais prevalentes em pacientes com câncer, sendo reportada por 50% a 90% dos pacientes durante o curso da doença ou do seu tratamento, impactando na qualidade de vida de forma severa além de diminuir a capacidade funcional diária dos pacientes. Uma abordagem ampla deve ser realizada com orientações gerais sobre fadiga, além da determinação de um plano individualizado de abordagem terapêutica. Pacientes com fadiga moderada ou severa devem se beneficiar de ambas as medidas farmacológicas e não farmacológicas a serem adotadas, enquanto pacientes que apresentem fadiga leve que não interfira na qualidade de vida podem ser tratados com medidas não farmacológicas como única medida terapêutica. O tratamento não farmacológico se mostra promissor com o uso de terapias cognitivas-comportamentais (conservação de energia e organização de atividades diárias realizadas, ECAM), exercícios físicos e talvez terapias do sono. O tratamento farmacológico tem mostrado resultados promissores que incluem o uso de psicoestimulantes tais como metilfenidato e dexmetilfenidato, modanafil (em pacientes com fadiga severa) e agentes estimuladores de eritropoietina em pacientes com anemia associada à quimioterapia e hemoglobina menor que 10 mg/dL. Além dessas drogas, o uso de Guaraná (Paullinia cupana) tem-se mostrado uma opção promissora, com efeitos benéficos no tratamento da fadiga física e mental relacionada ao câncer. Por ser uma opção sem efeitos colaterais significantes e uma planta nacional, torna-se atrativo considerando o fácil acesso a esta medicação por seu baixo custo e fácil adesão ao tratamento. O tratamento pode ser oferecido através de uma abordagem multimodal e multidisciplinar que individualize as opções terapêuticas dentro de um contexto que promova o diagnóstico acurado da FRC, além de um tratamento específico e adequado para cada paciente que apresente este sintoma tão importante e de grande impacto na qualidade de vida de pacientes com câncer.

Cancer-related fatigue is the most prevalent cancer symptom, reported in 50%-90% of patients and severely impacts quality of life and functional capacity. The condition remains underreported and often goes untreated. Guidelines suggest screening for fatigue at the initial visit, when the diagnosis of advanced disease is made, and at each chemotherapy session, as well as the identification of treatable contributing factors such as anemia, hypothyroidism, depression and sleep disorders. Brief assessment tools such as the Brief Fatigue Inventory or the Visual Analog Scale may be appropriate in the initial scoring of fatigue severity, but the initial approach to treatment usually requires a more comprehensive assessment, education, and the determination of an individualized treatment plan. Patients with moderate or severe fatigue may benefit from both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, whereas mild fatigue that does not interfere with quality of life can be treated with non-pharmacological measures alone. Non-pharmacological measures that have shown to be promising include cognitive-behavioral interventions such as energy conservation and activity management (ECAM), exercise and perhaps sleep therapy. Many other modalities may be beneficial and can be used on an individual basis, but there is insufficient evidence to promote any single treatment. Pharmacological therapies that have shown to be promising include the psycho-stimulants methylphenidate and dexmethylphenidate, modafinil (in severely fatigued patients only), and erythropoietin-stimulating agents in patients with chemotherapy-associated anemia and hemoglobin levels < 10 g/dL. Recently, our group reported impressive results with the use of the dry extract of Guarana (Paullinia cupana), with no significant side effects and at low cost, for the treatment of physical and mental cancer-related fatigue.

INTRODUÇÃO: Termo de Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido (TCLE) é o documento que informa sobre os benefícios e riscos de um estudo. Alguns autores concluíram que os TCLE são de difícil compreensão. OBJETIVO: Correlacionar grau de dificuldade dos TCLE, pelos índices de Flesch (IF) e Flesch-Kincaid (ILFK), utilizados num ambulatório de oncologia ao perfil de escolaridade dos usuários desse mesmo serviço, bem como verificar a legibilidade e a presença das informações obrigatórias segundo o item IV.1 da Resolução 196/96 do Conselho Nacional de Saúde. RESULTADOS: Foram obtidos 10 TCLE; segundo o IF e ILFK, a média foi de 38,5 e 18,16 respectivamente, mostrando ser necessário aproximadamente 18 anos de estudo para a compreensão, dado incompatível com a realidade de nossa população, em que mais de 50% tem menos de oito anos de estudos. Em relação à qualidade dos termos, estes eram bem elaborados tecnicamente, contendo a maior parte dos itens necessários. Ao correlacionarmos o ILFK com a qualidade dos TCLEs, pôde-se observar que a qualidade dos termos não apresentou correlação com a legibilidade (p= 0.884, coeficiente de correlação de Pearson 0.053). CONCLUSÃO: O grau de dificuldade dos TCLE é incompatível com a escolaridade de nossa população e nossos TCLE apresentavam informações suficientes. Esperávamos relacionar a quantidade de informações ao grau de dificuldade de compreensão do texto, não sendo confirmada, mostrando a possibilidade de um TCLE ser completo ao mesmo tempo fácil de ler.

BACKGROUND: The Consent Form (CF) is an important document that informs patients about benefits and risks of a study, it assures patients the right to accept or reject participation in a procedure related to their health. Some authors believe that Consent Forms are complex and difficult to read for most people. OBJECTIVE: Correlate the difficulty of understanding CF, through the Flesch Index (FI) and Flesch-Kincaid Index (FKI), used in our oncology outpatient clinic, with the profile of our patient's education. We also wanted to verify readability and presence of the information which must be part of these CF according to item IV.1 from Resolution 196/96 of the Brazilian Health Council. RESULTS: We obtained 10 CFs, according to FI and FKI the mean was 38.5 and 18.16 respectively, indicating that, at least, 18 years of study are needed for the comprehension. This result is incompatible with the Brazilian population where more than 50% have less than 8 years of study. According to the quality of the CF, they were well elaborated, and had most of the necessary contents. When the authors correlated FKI and quality of CF, they concluded that the quality of CF does not correlate with readability (p= 0.884, Pearson correlation coefficients 0.053). CONCLUSION: Despite the good content quality of most of the analyzed CF, their level of reading difficulty is not compatible with the literacy skills of a major part of the Brazilian population.

OBJETIVO: Identificar as possíveis fases de atraso na condução de pacientes com câncer de mama atendidas em um hospital público, desde a suspeita até o diagnóstico e o início do tratamento. MÉTODOS: Estudo retrospectivo, no qual foram analisados em pacientes com câncer de mama atendidas consecutivamente no Serviço de Oncologia do Hospital Estadual Mário Covas, durante o ano de 2006, os dados relativos aos intervalos de tempo transcorrido entre a suspeita, o diagnóstico e o início do tratamento adjuvante sistêmico. RESULTADOS: Sessenta e oito mulheres foram incluídas. A média de idade foi de 56,3 anos (desvio padrão: 12,2 anos). Entre os intervalos analisados, o maior atraso ocorreu entre a suspeita mamográfica de câncer e a realização da biópsia (mediana de 72 dias, variação de 4 a 1095 dias), sendo este significativamente maior (p<0,001) quando comparado aos demais intervalos analisados. Além disso, considerando particularmente este intervalo, verifica-se que foi significativamente maior nas pacientes com câncer de mama de estadio avançado, comparativamente àquelas de estadio inicial (p=0,014). CONCLUSÃO: Pacientes com câncer de mama tratadas em serviço público sofrem atrasos importantes, principalmente no período de diagnóstico de sua doença. Com base em nossos dados, otimizar o intervalo entre a mamografia e a obtenção da biópsia de lesões suspeitas parece ser a estratégia mais profícua.

BACKGROUND: To identify potential delays in the management of patients with breast cancer examined at a public hospital, from time of suspicion until diagnosis and beginning of treatment. METHODS: Retrospective study which analyzed data related to time elapsed in different intervals between suspicion, diagnosis and onset of systemic cancer-directed treatments, of consecutive breast cancer patients cared for at the medical oncology clinic of the Mario Covas Hospital during 2006. RESULTS: Sixty-eight women, with a mean age of 56.3 years (standard deviation: 12.2 years), were included. Of all the intervals, the longest delay occurred between the mammographic suspicion of cancer and performance of biopsy (median of 72 days, range: 4 - 1095 days); this was significantly longer (P<0.001) than in the other intervals analyzed. Furthermore, this interval in particular, was significantly longer in patients with advanced stage breast cancer when compared to those at the initial stage (P=0.014). CONCLUSION: Breast cancer patients treated in a public hospital in Brazil suffer delays, especially during the diagnosis of their disease. Minimizing the time between mammography and biopsy of suspicious lesions appears to be the most crintical step to correct this situation.

OBJETIVO: Examinar o impacto da razão entre linfonodos comprometidos e o total de linfonodos dissecados como fator de prognóstico em pacientes com câncer de cólon. MÉTODOS: Trata-se de um trabalho retrospectivo, realizado por meio da consulta dos prontuários dos pacientes com câncer de cólon, consecutivos, provenientes de três instituições localizadas no ABC paulista. De cada prontuário, foram extraídos dados demográficos e dados relacionados à doença. Estatística descritiva e regressão proporcional de Cox foram utilizadas para descrever os resultados. RESULTADOS: Foram analisados 106 pacientes no total, com média de idade de 62,82 ± 11,6 anos, sendo a maioria do sexo masculino (53,8%). A mediana de linfonodos dissecados por paciente foi de 11,5 (3 45 linfonodos) e 58,5% tiveram mais que 10 linfonodos dissecados. A média do tempo de seguimento foi de 25,05 ± 15,21 meses (2 64 meses), sendo que 32,1% dos pacientes faleceram em conseqüência do tumor. A análise univariada mostrou que a sobrevida dos pacientes incluídos no estudo está relacionada ao quociente linfonodos positivos / linfonodos dissecados (p=0,044), estadiamento da doença (p=0,001) e recidiva do tumor (p=0,058). No entanto, na realização da análise multivariada, observou-se que o único fator independente relacionado à sobrevida para câncer de cólon na população estudada é o estadiamento (p=0,001). CONCLUSÃO: Neste estudo, o quociente linfonodal não foi associado à sobrevida global de forma independente quando considerado juntamente ao estadiamento em pacientes com carcinoma de cólon. Estudos com número maior de pacientes e prospectivos são necessários para avaliar o real impacto do quociente linfonodal no prognóstico de pacientes com câncer de cólon.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the prognostic value of the ratio between positive and total dissected lymph nodes in patients with colon cancer who underwent primary tumor surgical resection. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of consecutive patients with colon cancer treated at hospitals affiliated to the ABC Foundation School of Medicine, Santo André. Demographic data were collected as well as information on colon cancer, treatment and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: One hundred and six patients were included. Mean age was 62.82 ± 11.6 years and most were men (53.8%). Median number of lymph nodes dissected per patient was 11.5 (3 45 lymph nodes) and 58.5% had more than 10 dissected lymph nodes. The median follow-up was 25.05 ± 15.21 months (2 64 months). In univariate analysis for overall survival, lymph node ratio (p=0.044), tumor stage (p=0.001) and tumor recurrence (p=0.058) were considered significant. In multivariate analysis only tumor stage was significantly associated with overall survival (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: In this limited retrospective series, the ratio between positive and dissected lymph nodes was not independently associated with overall survival among patients with colon cancer, when considered together with the pathological stage. Larger and prospective studies are warranted to define the impact of such ratio on the overall survival of colon cancer patients.