Abstract Background: Isotretinoin is a synthetic retinoid, derived from vitamin A, with multiple mechanisms of action and highly effective in the treatment of acne, despite common adverse events, manageable and dose-dependent. Dose-independent teratogenicity is the most serious. Therefore, off-label prescriptions require strict criteria. Objective: To communicate the experience and recommendation of Brazilian dermatologists on oral use of the drug in dermatology. Methods: Eight experts from five universities were appointed by the Brazilian Society of Dermatology to develop a consensus on indications for this drug. Through the adapted DELPHI methodology, relevant elements were listed and an extensive analysis of the literature was carried out. The consensus was defined with the approval of at least 70% of the experts. Results: With 100% approval from the authors, there was no doubt about the efficacy of oral isotretinoin in the treatment of acne, including as an adjunct in the correction of scars. Common and manageable common adverse events are mucocutaneous in nature. Others, such as growth retardation, abnormal healing, depression, and inflammatory bowel disease have been thoroughly investigated, and there is no evidence of a causal association; they are rare, individual, and should not contraindicate the use of the drug. Regarding unapproved indications, it may represent an option in cases of refractory rosacea, severe seborrheic dermatitis, stabilization of field cancerization with advanced photoaging and, although incipient, frontal fibrosing alopecia. For keratinization disorders, acitretin performs better. In the opinion of the authors, indications for purely esthetic purposes or oil control are not recommended, particularly for women of childbearing age. Conclusions: Approved and non-approved indications, efficacy and adverse effects of oral isotretinoin in dermatology were presented and critically evaluated.

Abstract: Background: Brazil does not have a rosacea-specific quality of life questionnaire. Objectives: translation into Brazilian Portuguese, development of cultural adaptation, and validation of the RosaQoL disease-specific questionnaire for rosacea of any subtype. Methods: the recommended procedures for translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of an instrument were followed, and three interviews were conducted: baseline; seven to fourteen days after baseline; and at four to six months. The questionnaire was analyzed (with 95% confidence interval) for reliability by internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha); testretest reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient); responsiveness and validity. Results: terms of the original questionnaire were replaced to guarantee cultural and semantic equivalence. Validity was demonstrated by expressive correlations between the RosaQoL domains and by significance in the Jonckheere-Terpstra test (p≤0.05) between the scores of the RosaQoL domains and the participants' self-perception in relation to the disease. Reliability was acceptable; alpha coefficient ranged from 0.923 to 0.916 in the first and second applications of the RosaQoL, respectively, and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) ranged from 0.671 to 0.863 in the seven- to fourteen-day period. Responsiveness, measured by grouping participants into three categories based on self-perception of rosacea (better, worse or unchanged), was found for the “better” response group (p≤0.05). Study limitations: small sample; limited variety of screening sources. Conclusions: RosaQoL-BR (Brazil) was demonstrated as a reliable, valid and responsive questionnaire, with limitations, for individuals with any subtype of rosacea.

OBJETIVO: Identificação das principais variáveis que interferem na qualidade de instilação correta de colírio antiglaucomatoso. MÉTODOS: Realizou-se estudo transversal em 40 pacientes glaucomatosos sob tratamento clínico com uso de colírio, aplicando-se um questionário e realizando-se observações quanto à instilação. Foram investigadas as seguintes variáveis: sexo; escolaridade; idade; condições sócioeconômicas; lavagem das mãos; número de gotas por aplicação; alteração motora; pessoa que aplica o colírio; local da aplicação; contato do frasco com as pálpebras, a conjuntiva e a córnea; instrução pregressa; posição de aplicação; ardor, dor ou irritação ocular após a aplicação e acuidade visual. A partir do questionário e das observações, as variáveis citadas foram correlacionadas com a qualidade de instilação. O modelo de análise foi a regressão logística binária. RESULTADOS: Dentre todas as variáveis em questão, apenas a pessoa que aplica o colírio e a sensação de ardor, dor ou irritação ocular mostraram-se estatisticamente significativas para uma adequada instilação de colírio. CONCLUSÃO: A presença de um acompanhante e o ardor à instilação do colírio influenciaram significativamente na qualidade de instilação do mesmo.

PURPOSE:To identify the most important variables interfering with the correct topical administration of antiglaucomatous drugs. METHODS: Forty glaucomatous patients under clinical treatment were interviewed and observed while applying antiglaucomatous drugs. The following variables were analyzed: sex; age; income; washing of the hands; number of drops; motor abnormalities; availability of another person to apply the drug; place of the globe reached; bottle-eye contact; previous instruction; positioning for application; development of a burning sensation, pain or irritation. Using the questionary, the variables were correlated with the quality of instillation. RESULTS: Among all variables, only the availability of another person to apply the drug and the existence of a burning sensation, pain or eye irritation showed statistically important correlation to proper instillation. CONCLUSION: The presence of a companion and the development of burning sensation affected the quality of instillation.