RESUMO Objetivo Traçar um perfil das condições periodontais de pacientes com doença renal crônica em hemodiálise e seu risco periodontal. Métodos Foram incluídos no estudo 115 pacientes em hemodiálise. Os parâmetros clínicos periodontais avaliados foram: índice de placa, índice gengival, profundidade de sondagem e perda de nível de inserção clínico. Os pacientes foram classificados de acordo com a presença e a gravidade da doença periodontal, bem como de acordo com o risco periodontal. Resultados Quanto aos parâmetros clínicos, 107 pacientes dentados (93%) apresentaram média de índice de placa de 1,53±0,78 e gengival de 0,95±0,85, profundidade de sondagem de 2,2±0,6mm e nível de inserção clínica de 3,18±1,75mm. Em relação à doença periodontal, 1 (0,94%) era saudável, 55 (51,40%) apresentavam periodontite leve, 28 (26,17%) moderada e 23 (21,49%) avançada. Com relação ao risco, dos 107 pacientes, 37 apresentavam risco baixo, 35 moderado e 35 alto. Os pacientes com doença periodontal avançada apresentaram 104,5 vezes mais chance de ter alto risco comparado ao baixo (odds ratio: 104,5; IC95%: 10,7-1017,2; p<0,0001). Conclusão A maioria dos pacientes com doença renal crônica apresentou doença periodontal, indicando um processo infeccioso e inflamatório crônico, que pode influenciar na condição sistêmica. Evidencia-se a necessidade de uma abordagem preventiva e intervencionista nesta população, enfatizando a importância da saúde bucal. A avaliação do risco periodontal seria uma ferramenta na elaboração de terapias periodontais individualizadas para uma melhor condição de saúde geral.

ABSTRACT Objective To establish a profile of periodontal conditions in chronic kidney disease patients on hemodialysis and their periodontal risk. Methods We included 115 patients on hemodialysis. Clinical periodontal parameters assessed were: plaque index, gingival index, probing depth and clinical attachment level. Patients were classified according to presence/absence and severity of periodontal disease and periodontal risk. Results In 107 dentate patients (93%) the plaque index was 1.53±0.78, the gingival index was 0.95±0.85, the probing depth was 2.2±0.6mm and the clinical attachment level was 3.18±1.75mm. We observed that 1 patient (0.94%) did not have periodontal disease, 55 patients (51.40%) had slight, 28 (26.17%) moderate and 23 (21.49%) severe periodontal disease. Among 107 patients, 37 (34.58%) had low risk, 35 (32.71%) moderate risk and 35 (32.71%) high risk. Patients with severe periodontal disease showed 104.5 more chance of high risk compared with low risk individuals (odds ratio: 104.5; 95%CI: 10.7-1017.2; p<0.0001). Conclusion Most of patients with chronic renal disease presented periodontal disease, indicating the presence of chronic inflammatory and infection process that may influence in systemic conditions. A prevention and interventionist approach in this population is needed, especially to emphasize the importance of oral health. The periodontal risk assessment is a useful tool to create individualized periodontal therapies and to improve general health condition.

This study aimed to investigate age-related changes in the biosynthetic capacity of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in the gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) during one month of orthodontic treatment. Twenty-five juvenile subjects (mean age 13 ± 2.1 years) and 23 adults (mean age 24 ± 2.1 years) were included. GCF was collected immediately before the force application at the baseline, 2, 21 and 28 days, with periopaper inserted into the gingival crevice of the maxillary lateral incisors. The mediator levels were determined with an EIA kit. The results showed that the PGE2 concentrations were significantly elevated from the baseline to 21 days (129.35 and 198.84 pg/µL, p = 0.0169) in juvenile subjects and reduced from 21 to 28 days (198.84 to 112.60 pg/µL, p = 0.0032). Adults, however, had no significant changes in the PGE2 levels. The total amounts of PGE2 from both groups changed between the baseline to 21 and 21 to 28 days (p = 0.0119 and p = 0.0076, respectively). The PGE2 initial and final levels showed significant differences between the juveniles and adults, being higher in adults (baseline: juvenile = 129.35 pg/µL vs. adult = 163.20 pg/µL, p = 0.0379; t3: juvenile = 112.60 pg/µL and adult = 175.30 pg/µL, p = 0.0005). In conclusion, the results demonstrate the presence of variation in the PGE2 levels according to age and the orthodontic activation period, which can explain why the speed of orthodontics treatment may be different in adults vs. juveniles.