À medida que os avanços médico-tecnológicos continuam a se tornar mais facilmente disponíveis, o diagnóstico de pseudo-doenças atingiu o cerne dos sistemas de saúde e tornou-se uma das atividades mais prejudiciais da medicina moderna, tanto individual quanto coletivamente, pois ameaça a sustentabilidade dos sistemas de saúde. Aqui descrevemos um caso hipotético, mas baseado em casos reais, de uma jovem de 36 anos diagnosticada com um carcinoma papilífero de tireoide após ter sido submetida a um check-up excessivo e desnecessário solicitado por um ginecologista em uma consulta de rotina.

As medical technological advances continue to become more readily available, diagnosis of pseudo-disease has hit the heart of medicine and has become one of the most harmful activities in modern medicine, both individually and collectively speaking as it threatens the sustainability of health systems. Here we describe a hypothetical case (but based on many similar real ones) of a young adult woman in her middle 30’s that has been diagnosed with a papillary thyroid cancer after she had been submitted to an excessive and unnecessary check-up elicited by a gynaecologist in a routine medical consultation.

À medida que os avanços médico-tecnológicos continuam a se tornar mais facilmente disponíveis, o diagnóstico de pseudo-doenças atingiu o cerne dos sistemas de saúde e tornou-se uma das atividades mais prejudiciais da medicina moderna, tanto individual quanto coletivamente, pois ameaça a sustentabilidade dos sistemas de saúde. Aqui descrevemos um caso hipotético, mas baseado em casos reais, de uma jovem de 36 anos diagnosticada com um carcinoma papilífero de tireoide após ter sido submetida a um check-up excessivo e desnecessário solicitado por um ginecologista em uma consulta de rotina.

As medical technological advances continue to become more readily available, diagnosis of pseudo-disease has hit the heart of medicine and has become one of the most harmful activities in modern medicine, both individually and collectively speaking as it threatens the sustainability of health systems. Here we describe a hypothetical case (but based on many similar real ones) of a young adult woman in her middle 30’s that has been diagnosed with a papillary thyroid cancer after she had been submitted to an excessive and unnecessary check-up elicited by a gynaecologist in a routine medical consultation.

OBJECTIVES: Feedback is a powerful learning tool, but a lack of appropriate feedback is a very common complaint from learners to teachers. To improve opportunities for feedback on objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs), a modified examiner role, termed the “shadow” examiner, was tested. This study aims to present and analyze comparisons between the “shadow” examiner and the original OSCE examiner format. METHODS: In 2011, experiments were carried out with modifications to the examiner’s role to define the “shadow” examiner format. From February 2012 to May 2014, research was conducted with 415 6th-year medical students. Of these students, 316 were randomly assigned to assessments by both “shadow” and “fixed” examiners. Pearson correlation analysis with linear regression, Student’s t-tests and Bland-Altman plots were the statistical methods used to compare the assessment modes. To strengthen the analysis, checklist items were classified by domain. RESULTS: High correlations between the “shadow” and “fixed” examiners’ global scores were observed. The results of the analysis of specific domains demonstrated higher correlations for cognitive scores and lower correlations for affective scores. No statistically significant differences between the mean examiner global scores were found. The Bland-Altman analysis showed that the “shadow” examiners’ affective scores were significantly higher than those of the “fixed” examiners, but the magnitude of this difference was small. CONCLUSION: The modified examiner role did not lead to any important bias in the students’ scores compared with the original OSCE examiner format. This new strategy may provide important insights for formative assessments of clinical performance.

Introdução: A infecção do trato urinário (ITU) tem alta incidência e recorrência, e o tratamento é empírico na maioria dos casos. Objetivos: O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar as culturas de urina realizadas em um hospital secundário, durante dois períodos: 2005-2006 e 2010-2011, para estimar a resistência microbiana. Pacientes e métodos: Foram analisadas 11.943 culturas aeróbicas de urina de acordo com um conjunto de dados demográficos básicos e susceptibilidade aos antibióticos, obedecendo às normas do Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) para Vitek 1 e 2. Resultados: A maioria dos participantes era adulta e jovem atendida no Serviço de Emergência. E. coli foi a mais freqüente (70,2%) entre as 75 espécies isoladas. Resistência de todos os isolados foi ≥ 20% para sulfametoxazol/trimetoprim (SMX/TMP), norfloxacina, nitrofurantoína, cefazolina e ácido nalidíxico, apesar de E. coli ter sido mais suscetível (resistência ≥ 20% apenas para SMX/TMP e ácido nalidíxico) entre todos os isolados, levando em conta a porcentagem de resistência e o número de antibióticos testados. Resistência às fluoroquinolonas foi de 12%. Fatores de risco para E. coli: sexo feminino e idade < 65 anos. Homens e pacientes com mais de 65 anos apresentaram isolados mais resistentes. Beta-lactamases de espectro estendido (ESBL) foram identificadas em 173 de 5.722 isolados Gram-negativos (3,0%), 2010-2011. Conclusões: E. coli foi o isolado mais sensível a antibióticos. Houve uma evolução significativa da resistência antimicrobiana entre os dois períodos. Foi preocupante o aumento da resistência às fluoroquinolonas.

Introduction: Urinary tract infection (UTI) has a high incidence and recurrence, therefore, treatment is empirical in the majority of cases. Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the urine cultures performed at a secondary hospital, during two periods, 2005-2006 and 2010-2011, and to estimate the microbial resistance. Patients and methods: We analyzed 11,943 aerobic urine cultures according to basic demographic data and susceptibility to antibiotics in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) for Vitek 1 and 2. Results: Most of our cohort consisted of young adult females that were seen at the Emergency Department. E. coli was the most frequent (70.2%) among the 75 species isolated. Resistance of all isolates was ≥ 20% for trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), norfloxacin, nitrofurantoin, cefazolin and nalidixic acid. Although E. coli was more susceptible (resistance ≥ 20% for TMP/SMX and nalidixic acid) among all of the isolates, when classified by the number and percentage of antibiotic resistance. Global resistance to fluoroquinolones was approximately 12%. Risk factors for E. coli were female gender and an age less than 65 years. Men and patients older than 65 years of age, presented more resistant isolates. Extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) were identified in 173 out of 5,722 Gram-negative isolates (3.0%) between 2010 and 2011. Conclusion: E. coli was the most frequent microbe isolated in the urine cultures analyzed in this study. There was a significant evolution of bacterial resistance between the two periods studied. In particular, the rise of bacterial resistance to fluoroquinolones was concerning.

Alguns autores têm sugerido que um escore de cálcio (CAC) igual à zero pode ser usado para descartar o diagnóstico de síndrome coronariana aguda. Objetivo do estudo é avaliar a precisão do diagnóstico de um CAC zero quando comparado com a angiotomografia coronária (ATC) no Pronto-Socorro. 135 pacientes sintomáticos sem doença arterial coronariana (DAC) prévia atendidos no Pronto-Socorro, foram submetidos ao CAC e à ATC para descartar a DAC. Todos os pacientes tinham eletrocardiograma e marcadores cardíacos normais e apresentaram escore de risco TIMI de 0 a 2. A ATC foi considerada positiva no caso de identificação de qualquer lesão obstrutiva (> 50%). A média de idade era de 51,7 ± 13,6 anos, com 50,6% de homens. Setenta e três (54,1%) pacientes apresentaram um escore zero de cálcio. Desses, 3 (4,1%) tiveram uma obstrução > 50% e foram submetidos a angiografia coronária invasiva. O escore de cálcio mostrou uma sensibilidade de 92,9%, especificidade de 75,3% e valores preditivos positivos e negativos de, respectivamente, 62,9% e 95,9%. As razões de verossimilhança positiva e negativa foram respectivamente de 3,7 e 0,09 para a detecção de lesões maiores do que 50% na ATC. A razão de verossimilhança negativa de 0,09 é muito boa para descartar a maioria dos casos de obstrução coronária significativa em estudos epidemiológicos. No entanto, é importante entender que em um cenário clínico, todas as evidências, incluindo histórico, exame clínico, dados de biomarcadores miocárdicos e do eletrocardiograma, devem ser interpretados em conjunto. Em nosso estudo, três casos com um escore CAC zero tinham obstrução coronariana superior a 50% na ATC.

Some authors have suggested that a zero calcium score (CAC) can be used to rule out the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome. Objective this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a zero CAC when compared to the coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) at the emergency department. 135 symptomatic patients with no previous coronary heart disease (CHD) who presented to the emergency department were submitted to CAC and CCTA to rule out CHD. All patients had normal electrocardiogram and cardiac biomarkers and were TIMI risk score 0 to 2. The CCTA was considered positive if any obstructive lesion (> 50%) was identified. The mean age was 51.7 ± 13.6 years with 50.6% of men. Seventy-three (54.1%) patients had a calcium score of zero. Of them, 3 (4.1%) had an obstruction > 50 % and underwent invasive coronary angiography. Calcium score showed a sensitivity of 92.9%, specificity of 75.3%, positive and negative predictive values of, respectively, 62.9% and 95.9%. Positive and negative likelihood ratios were respectively of 3.7 and 0.09 to detect lesions greater than 50% in the CCTA. A negative likelihood ratio of 0.09 is very good to rule out most cases of significant coronary obstruction in epidemiologic studies. However, it is important to understand that in a clinical scenario, all evidence including history, clinical examination, data from eletrocardiogram and myocardial biomarkers have to be interpreted together. In our study, three cases with a zero CAC score had coronary obstruction higher than 50% at the CCTA.