Abstract Introduction Glycemic control is important to avoid diabetes complications in individuals with cancer. There is no evidence for HbA1c and fructosamine as reliable biomarkers in these conditions. There are particularities in caring for patients with diabetes and cancer that can alter these biomarkers. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate HbA1c and fructosamine as glycemic biomarkers in people with type 2 diabetes and cancer, undergoing clinical or surgical oncological treatment. Methods The authors conducted a single-center, retrospective analysis with people who have cancer and diabetes. Comparison of glycemic biomarkers (HbA1c, fructosamine, and Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose [SMBG]) was performed including evaluation in individuals undergoing chemotherapy, using glucocorticoids, with anemia, hypoproteinemia or with reduced estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR). Results There was a strong positive correlation between fructosamine and HbA1c (n = 318, r= 0.66, p < 0.001) in people with diabetes and cancer even in those under chemotherapy (n = 101, r= 0.61, p < 0.001) or using glucocorticoids (n = 96, r= 0.67, p<0.001). There was a strong correlation between HbA1c and fructosamine in subjects with anemia (n = 111, r= 0.66, p < 0.001), hypoproteinemia (n = 54, r= 0.67, p < 0.001), or with eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (n = 189, r= 0.70, p < 0.001), and moderate correlation with hypoalbuminemia (n = 21, r= 0.54, p = 0.001) and with reduced eGFR (n = 67, r= 0.57, p < 0.001). The correlations between fructosamine and HbA1c with SMBG were moderate (n = 164, r= 0.49, p < 0.001; n = 111, r= 0.55, p < 0.001, respectively), strong in subjects undergoing chemotherapy, with hypoalbuminemia or hypoproteinemia, and at least moderate, if eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or with anemia. Conclusions Fructosamine and HbA1c can be used as glycemic biomarkers in people with diabetes and cancer, even in those with anemia, hypoproteinemia, or undergoing chemotherapy. HbAc HbA c conditions treatment singlecenter, singlecenter single center, center single-center HbA1c, (HbA1c SelfMonitoring Self Monitoring [SMBG] eGFR. . (eGFR) 318 r 066 0 66 0.66 0.001 0001 001 101 061 61 0.61 96 067 67 0.67 p<0.001. p0001 p<0.001 p<0.001) 111 , 54 6 mLmin173 mLmin mL min 1 73 mL/min/1.7 m 189 070 70 0.70 21 054 0.54 057 57 0.57 0.001. 164 049 49 0.49 055 55 0.55 respectively, respectively respectively) [SMBG (eGFR 31 06 0.6 0.00 000 00 10 9 p000 p<0.00 11 5 mLmin17 7 mL/min/1. 18 07 0.7 05 0.5 16 04 4 0.4 3 0. 0.0 p00 p<0.0 mLmin1 mL/min/1 p0 p<0. mL/min/ p<0 mL/min p<

Relatamos um caso no qual a avaliação quantitativa do coeficiente de difusão aparente (ADC) de metástases hepáticas submetidas a quimioterapia se mostrou um bom preditor e marcador precoce de resposta terapêutica, antecipando alterações de tamanho. Lesão com valor inicial do ADC mais baixo e com aumento precoce deste valor no curso do tratamento tende a apresentar melhor resposta terapêutica tardia.

The authors report a case where a quantitative assessment of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of liver metastasis in a patient undergoing chemotherapy has shown to be an effective early marker for predicting therapeutic response, anticipating changes in tumor size. A lesion with lower initial ADC value and early increase in such value in the course of the treatment tends to present a better therapeutic response.