ABSTRACT Objective The aim of this observational, cross-sectional study was to investigate physicians’ preferences for radioiodine (RAI) treatment in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) in Brazil and the factors influencing RAI indications. Materials and methods A survey was distributed to physicians potentially involved in DTC care in Brazil to understand the factors influencing RAI indications. The survey collected information on the profiles of the physicians, along with the characteristics of their workplaces and their preferences regarding RAI indications in three hypothetical clinical cases. Cases 1, 2, and 3 described the cases of patients with DTC and variations to the case that included different scenarios to assess how the respondents would change their RAI recommendations. The analysis included the RAI indications across different medical specialties. Results A total of 175 physicians answered the survey. There was considerable variability in RAI recommendations in all three cases. The training background influenced the respondents' preferences for RAI indications and their approaches to preparing patients for RAI treatment. Conclusion The findings of this study reaffirm the need for a Brazilian consensus among physicians across multiple specialties to help guide health care professionals treating patients with DTC in Brazil. observational crosssectional cross sectional (RAI (DTC 1 2 17

Resumo Objetivo: O objetivo deste trabalho foi levantar o potencial de dose de radiação emitida por pacientes em procedimentos diagnósticos, visando a estabelecer cuidados de radioproteção mais otimizados. Materiais e Métodos: Taxas de dose de radiação emitidas por 175 pacientes administrados com os radionuclídeos 99mTc, 131I e 18F para cintilografias óssea, renal, cardíaca, cerebral e corpo inteiro, foram mensuradas com um detector de radiação, servindo para avaliar o clareamento do radiofármaco no organismo e risco de exposição após administração dos radiofármacos. Resultados: O clareamento, representado pela meia-vida efetiva, variou de 1,18 ± 0,30 h até 11,41 ± 0,02 h e a dose de radiação máxima acumulada oferecida pelos pacientes a 1,0 m foi de 149,74 ± 56,72 µSv. Mesmo para distâncias de 0,5 m, as doses estimadas foram, respectivamente, duas e dez vezes inferiores ao nível de restrição para o público geral (1,0 mSv) e exposição médica (5,0 mSv/episódio). Conclusão: Doses de radiação oferecidas por pacientes em procedimentos diagnósticos são inferiores aos níveis de restrição recomendados pela International Commission on Radiological Protection e International Atomic Energy Agency, e assim, cuidados de radioproteção são geralmente desnecessários. Objetivo otimizados Métodos 17 99mTc mTc I F óssea renal cardíaca inteiro radiofármacos Resultados meiavida meia vida efetiva 118 1 18 1,1 030 0 30 0,3 1141 11 41 11,4 002 02 0,0 10 1, 14974 149 74 149,7 5672 56 72 56,7 µSv 05 5 0, respectivamente (1, mSv 5,0 50 (5, mSv/episódio. mSvepisódio mSv/episódio . episódio mSv/episódio) Conclusão Agency assim desnecessários 03 3 114 4 11, 00 1497 14 7 149, 567 56, (1 5, (5 (

Abstract Objective: To measure the potential radiation dose emitted by patients who have recently undergone diagnostic nuclear medicine procedures, in order to establish optimal radiation safety measures for such procedures. Materials and Methods: We evaluated the radiation doses emitted by 175 adult patients in whom technetium-99m, iodine-131, and fluorine-18 radionuclides were administered for bone, kidney, heart, brain, and whole-body scans, as measured with a radiation detector. Those values served as the basis for evaluating whole-body radiopharmaceutical clearance, as well as the risk for the exposure of others to radiation, depending on the time elapsed since administration of the radiopharmaceutical. Results: The mean time to clearance of the radiopharmaceuticals administered, expressed as the effective half-life, ranged from 1.18 ± 0.30 h to 11.41 ± 0.02 h, and the mean maximum cumulative radiation dose at 1.0 m from the patients was 149.74 ± 56.72 µSv. Even at a distance of 0.5 m, the cumulative dose was found to be only half and one tenth of the limits established for exposure of the general public and family members/caregivers (1.0 mSv and 5.0 mSv per episode, respectively). Conclusion: Cumulative radiation doses emitted by patients immediately after diagnostic nuclear medicine procedures are considerably lower than the limits established by the International Commission on Radiological Protection and the International Atomic Energy Agency, and precautionary measures to avoid radiation exposure are therefore not required after such procedures. Objective Methods 17 technetium99m, technetium99m technetiumm technetium 99m, 99m technetium-99m iodine131, iodine131 iodine 131, 131 iodine-131 fluorine18 fluorine 18 fluorine-1 bone kidney heart brain wholebody whole body scans detector Results halflife, halflife life, life half-life 118 1 1.1 030 0 30 0.3 1141 11 41 11.4 002 02 0.0 10 1. 14974 149 74 149.7 5672 56 72 56.7 µSv 05 5 0. memberscaregivers members caregivers (1. 50 5. episode respectively. respectively . respectively) Conclusion Agency iodine13 13 iodine-13 fluorine1 fluorine- 03 3 114 4 11. 00 1497 14 7 149. 567 56. (1 iodine1 iodine-1 ( iodine-

Resumo Objetivo: Comparar o grau de absorção benigna de 18F-fluordesoxiglicose (18F-FDG) na medula óssea de pacientes com linfoma de Hodgkin com e sem sintomas B. Materiais e Métodos: Analisamos os prontuários de 74 pacientes com linfoma de Hodgkin submetidos a tomografia por emissão de pósitrons/tomografia computadorizada (PET/CT) com 18F-FDG antes do início da terapia entre outubro de 2010 e setembro de 2013. Em todos os pacientes, a biópsia da medula óssea foi negativa e as imagens de 18F-FDG PET/CT não sugeriram envolvimento da medula óssea. Dos 74 pacientes avaliados, 54 apresentaram sintomas inflamatórios (B) e 20 não. As regiões de interesse (ROIs) foram desenhadas no esterno, nos terços proximais dos úmeros, nos terços proximais dos fêmures e nas duas asas ilíacas (totalizando sete ROIs por paciente). Para comparar os pacientes com e sem sintomas B, em termos dos standardized uptake values (SUVs) para as sete ROIs, utilizamos o teste U de Mann-Whitney. Resultados: Para seis das ROIs, os SUVs foram maiores nos pacientes com sintomas B do que nos pacientes sem, e a diferença foi estatisticamente significante (p < 0,05). Houve também tendência para uma diferença estatisticamente significante entre os dois grupos em termos do SUV para a ROI da asa ilíaca direita (p = 0,06). Conclusão: Na nossa amostra, a presença de sintomas B foi associada ao aumento da captação de 18F-FDG na medula óssea.

Abstract Objective: To compare the degree of benign bone marrow uptake of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) between Hodgkin lymphoma patients with and without B symptoms. Materials and Methods: We analyzed the medical charts of 74 Hodgkin lymphoma patients who underwent 18F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) prior to the initiation of therapy between October 2010 and September 2013. In all of the patients, the bone marrow biopsy was negative and the 18F-FDG PET/CT images did not suggest bone marrow involvement. Of the 74 patients evaluated, 54 presented inflammatory (B) symptoms and 20 did not. Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on the sternum, the proximal thirds of the humeri, the proximal thirds of the femora, and both iliac wings (totaling seven ROIs per patient). To compare the patients with and without B symptoms, in terms of standardized uptake values (SUVs) for the seven ROIs, we used the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: For six of the ROIs, the SUVs were higher in the patients with B symptoms than in those without, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). There was also a tendency toward a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of the SUV for the right iliac wing ROI (p = 0.06). Conclusion: In our sample, the presence of B symptoms was associated with increased 18F-FDG uptake in bone marrow.