RESUMO JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: O impacto do ciclo menstrual na percepção da dor é um foco importante de estudo, sendo necessária uma maior elucidação na disfunção temporomandibular (DTM). Assim, este estudo transversal avaliou limiares de dor experimental, características psicossociais e relatos de dor em mulheres com DTM ao longo do ciclo menstrual, comparadas com controles saudáveis. MÉTODOS: 220 prontuários de mulheres foram analisados, sendo 80 selecionados para os grupos de controle (saudáveis, n=40) e DTM (dor miofascial, n=40). Nas fases do ciclo menstrual, as pacientes foram divididas nas categorias Pré-Luteal e Luteal. Os instrumentos Escala de Estresse Percebido (PSS), Escala de Pensamentos Catastróficos (PCS), Limiar de Dor Mecânica (MPT), Wind-up Ratio (WUR), Limiar de Dor à Pressão (PPT), Modulação Condicionada da Dor (CPM) e Escala analógica visual (EAV) foram analisados com nível de significância de 5%, pelos testes ANOVA de dois fatores e Tukey post hoc. RESULTADOS: As escalas PSS e PCS foram significativamente diferentes entre os grupos DTM e controle (p<0,001), independentemente do ciclo menstrual. Indivíduos saudáveis na fase luteal apresentaram MPT maior em comparação com outras fases (p,0,001). O PPT mostrou diferença significativa entre as fases menstruais (p=0,022), sem diferença nas comparações múltiplas. Os valores da EAV não apresentaram diferença entre as fases menstruais (p=376). CONCLUSÃO: Indivíduos saudáveis na fase luteal têm MPT e PPTl maior na região orofacial. Os relatos de dor em pacientes com DTM não mostraram diferença ao longo do ciclo menstrual, indicando que pequenas alterações nos limiares experimentais podem ser clinicamente relevantes. A presença de dor crônica parece estar mais relacionada com características psicossociais do que com flutuações hormonais. OBJETIVOS DTM. . (DTM) Assim experimental MÉTODOS 22 8 saudáveis, (saudáveis n=40 n40 n 40 miofascial n=40. PréLuteal Pré Luteal PSS, , (PSS) PCS, (PCS) MPT, (MPT) Windup Wind up WUR, WUR (WUR) PPT, (PPT) CPM (CPM (EAV 5 5% hoc RESULTADOS p<0,001, p0001 p p<0,001 0 001 (p<0,001) p,0,001. p,0,001 (p,0,001) p=0,022, p0022 p=0,022 022 (p=0,022) múltiplas p=376. p376 p=376 376 (p=376) CONCLUSÃO orofacial relevantes hormonais (DTM 2 n=4 n4 4 (PSS (PCS (MPT (WUR (PPT p000 p<0,00 00 (p<0,001 p,0,00 (p,0,001 p002 p=0,02 02 (p=0,022 p37 p=37 37 (p=376 n= p00 p<0,0 (p<0,00 p,0,0 (p,0,00 p=0,0 (p=0,02 p3 p=3 3 (p=37 p0 p<0, (p<0,0 p,0, (p,0,0 p=0, (p=0,0 p= (p=3 p<0 (p<0, p,0 (p,0, p=0 (p=0, (p= p< (p<0 p, (p,0 (p=0 (p (p< (p,
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The hormonal impact on pain perception during the menstrual cycle is a major focus of study, and further elucidation in temporomandibular disorders (TMD) field is necessary. Thus, this cross-sectional study evaluated experimental pain thresholds, psychosocial features, and clinical pain report on TMD women across menstrual cycle versus healthy controls. METHODS: A total of 220 women’s clinical files were screened, with 80 selected and divided into control group (healthy individuals, n=40) and TMD group (myofascial pain, n=40). Regarding the menstrual cycle phases, the files were divided into Pre-Luteal and Luteal. The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Mechanical Pain Threshold (MPT), Wind-up (WUR), Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT), Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were analyzed at a 5% significance level, by Two-Way ANOVA test and post hoc Tukey test. RESULTS: PSS and PCS were significantly different between TMD and control group (p<0.001), regardless of menstrual cycle. Healthy individuals in the Luteal phase presented higher MPT values compared to the other phases (p<0.001). PPT showed significant difference across menstrual phases (p=0.022), but no differences in multiple comparisons. VAS values showed no difference between menstrual cycle phases (p=0.376). CONCLUSION: Finally, healthy individuals in the Luteal phase have higher MPT and PPT values on the orofacial region. Pain report in patients with TMD showed no difference throughout the menstrual cycle, showing that small alterations on experimental pain thresholds may not be clinically relevant. The presence of chronic pain seems to be more related to psychosocial features than hormonal fluctuations. OBJECTIVES (TMD necessary Thus crosssectional cross sectional controls METHODS 22 womens s screened 8 n=40 n40 n 40 myofascial n=40. . PreLuteal Pre PSS, , (PSS) PCS, (PCS) MPT, (MPT) Windup Wind up WUR, WUR (WUR) PPT, (PPT) CPM (CPM (VAS 5 level TwoWay Two Way RESULTS p<0.001, p0001 p p<0.001 0 001 (p<0.001) p<0.001. p=0.022, p0022 p=0.022 022 (p=0.022) comparisons p=0.376. p0376 p=0.376 376 (p=0.376) CONCLUSION Finally region relevant fluctuations 2 n=4 n4 4 (PSS (PCS (MPT (WUR (PPT p000 p<0.00 00 (p<0.001 p002 p=0.02 02 (p=0.022 p037 p=0.37 37 (p=0.376 n= p00 p<0.0 (p<0.00 p=0.0 (p=0.02 p03 p=0.3 3 (p=0.37 p0 p<0. (p<0.0 p=0. (p=0.0 (p=0.3 p<0 (p<0. p=0 (p=0. p< (p<0 p= (p=0 (p< (p= (p