Abstract Background Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is a common complication of neuraxial techniques which delays patients’ discharge. Sphenopalatine ganglion block (SPGB) is a safe bedside technique with comparable efficacy to Epidural Blood Patch, the gold-standard treatment. There is no evidence on the ideal timing for SPGB performance. We aimed to evaluate the difference between early versus late SPGB concerning efficacy, symptom recurrence and hospital length of stay. Methods We present an observational study with 41 patients diagnosed with PDPH who were submitted to SPGB with ropivacaine 0,75%. The study sample (n = 41) was divided in two groups: an early (less than 24 hours after diagnosis) and a late (more than 24 hours after diagnosis) SPGB group. Pain was evaluated 15 minutes after the block and follow up occurred daily until patients were discharged. Patients’ demographic characteristics, neuraxial technique, timing of SPGB, qualitative pain relief and post-SPGB length of stay were registered and analyzed with SPSS statistics (v26) software. Results Early SPGB resulted in a significant reduction in length of stay (p = 0,009) and symptom recurrence (p = 0,036), showing equally effective pain relief, compared to late SPGB. Conclusions SPGB was equally effective in both groups. Data showed that early SPGB reduces length of hospital stay and symptom recurrence, which potentially allows early resumption of daily activities and a reduction in total health costs. (PDPH discharge (SPGB Patch goldstandard gold standard treatment performance 4 075 0 75 0,75% n groups less 2 diagnosis more group 1 discharged Patients characteristics postSPGB post v26 v (v26 software p 0,009 0009 009 0,036, 0036 0,036 , 036 0,036) costs 07 7 0,75 v2 (v2 0,00 000 00 003 0,03 03 0,7 (v 0,0 0,

Abstract Background Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol is composed by evidence-based interventions that aim to improve recovery through a reduction in surgical stress response. Although ERAS protocols have been introduced across the globe, exhaustive implementation is not as common. We aimed to study the ERAS protocol compliance in colorectal surgery, assessing the relationship between compliance and postoperative complications. Methods A single-center cohort study was conducted. All consecutive patients admitted to elective colorectal surgery were included. We assessed study endpoints according to ERAS protocol perioperative compliance score above 75%. Our primary endpoint was a composite of postoperative events, which includes in-hospital postoperative complications and need for reoperation after 30 days and need for readmission after discharge. Secondary endpoints were surgery-to-discharge time, postoperative use of only non-opioid adjuvants and the individual components of the primary endpoint. Results A total of 224 colorectal patients were included. The primary endpoint occurred in 59.2% (n = 58) of non-compliant patients comparing to 34.1% (n = 43) in compliant patients. In univariate analysis, compliance to ERAS protocol had an inferior risk for the primary endpoint (p< 0.001). In a logistic regression model, compliance was independently associated with a reduced risk for the primary endpoint with a odds-ratio of 0.42 (95% CI 0.23-0.75, p= 0.004). Conclusion Compliance with the ERAS protocol is associated with less complications, a reduced surgery-to-discharge time and use of only non-opioid adjuvants in the postoperative period. More studies are needed to target the most appropriate compliance goal. (ERAS evidencebased evidence based response globe common singlecenter single center conducted included 75 75% events inhospital hospital 3 discharge surgerytodischarge nonopioid non opioid 22 592 59 2 59.2 n 58 noncompliant 341 34 1 34.1 43 analysis p< p (p 0.001. 0001 0.001 . 0 001 0.001) model oddsratio odds ratio 042 42 0.4 95% 95 (95 0.230.75, 023075 0.23 0.75, 23 0.23-0.75 0.004. 0004 0.004 004 0.004) period goal 7 5 59. 34. 4 000 0.00 00 04 0. 9 (9 230 0.230.75 02307 023 0.2 075 0.75 0.23-0.7 0.0 ( 0.230.7 0230 02 07 0.7 0.23-0. 0.230. 0.23-0 0.230 0.23-

Background The outcome of patients with primary extranodal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PE-DLBCL) varies according to the primary site involved. Primary gastrointestinal, breast, bone, craniofacial, and testicular DLBCL are rare extranodal manifestations of DLBCL. Objective The objective of the study was to describe the clinical course of patients with PE-DLBCL disease in a referral cancer center. Results From 637 patients, 51 (8.77%) were considered as having PE-DLBCL (25 gastrointestinal, 12 craniofacial, 6 breast, 5 bone, and 3 with primary testicular DLBCL). Complete remission was higher in all PE-DLBCL sites (100% in testicular, 92.6% craniofacial, 83.3% breast, 80% bone, and 80% gastrointestinal) compared with 73.3% in nodal DLBCL. Although 2 cases with breast PE-DLBC relapsed, they achieved a complete response with chemotherapy. The overall survival at 5 years was 100%, 80%, 78%, 58%, 58%, and 62% for patients with primary breast, primary bone, gastrointestinal, primary craniofacial, primary testicular, and nodal DLBCL, respectively. Conclusions PE-DLBCLs constitute rare, primary sites of lymphoproliferative disorders in most cases, with localized disease and good prognosis. They require a combined chemoimmunotherapy with radiotherapy in most cases to improve local and systemic disease.

Resumo O angioedema hereditário (AEH), com uma prevalência estimada de 1:50000 pessoas, é uma doença rara mas potencialmente fatal. Pode se apresentar com edema sistêmico recorrente do tecido subcutâneo e das mucosas. Os doentes com AEH têm um risco acrescido de agudização clínica com o estresse cirúrgico, podem desenvolver síndromes de dificuldade respiratória por compromisso da via aérea e de instabilidade hemodinâmica. A abordagem perioperatória desses doentes requer intervenções específicas. Apresentamos um caso clínico de uma mulher de 50 anos com AEH tipo II indicada para realizar ureteroscopia com colocação de stent.

Abstract Hereditary angioedema (HAE), with an estimated prevalence of 1:50,000, is a rare but potentially fatal disease. It may present with recurrent systemic edema of the subcutaneous tissue and mucous membranes. Patients with HAE are at increased risk for clinical worsening with surgical stress, and may develop respiratory distress syndrome due to impaired airway and hemodynamic instability. The perioperative management of these patients requires specific interventions. We present a clinical case of a woman, 50 years old, with HAE type II scheduled for ureteral stent placement via endoscopic approach.