OBJECTIVE: To investigate and compare the influence of a previous history of foot ulcers on plantar pressure variables during gait of patients with diabetic neuropathy. INTRODUCTION: Foot ulcers may be an indicator of worsening diabetic neuropathy. However, the behavior of plantar pressure patterns over time and during the progression of neuropathy, especially in patients who have a clinical history of foot ulcers, is still unclear. METHODS: Subjects were divided into the following groups: control group, 20 subjects; diabetic neuropathy patients without foot ulcers, 17 subjects; and diabetic neuropathy patients with at least one healed foot ulcer within the last year, 10 subjects. Plantar pressure distribution was recorded during barefoot gait using the Pedar-X system. RESULTS: Neuropathic subjects from both the diabetic neuropathy and DNU groups showed higher plantar pressure than control subjects. At midfoot, the peak pressure was significantly different among all groups: control group (139.4±76.4 kPa), diabetic neuropathy (205.3±118.6 kPa) and DNU (290.7±151.5 kPa) (p=0.008). The pressure-time integral was significantly higher in the ulcerated neuropathic groups at midfoot (CG: 37.3±11.4 kPa.s; DN: 43.3±9.1 kPa.s; DNU: 68.7±36.5 kPa.s; p=0.002) and rearfoot (CG: 83.3±21.2 kPa.s; DN: 94.9±29.4 kPa.s; DNU: 102.5±37.9 kPa.s; p=0.048). CONCLUSION: A history of foot ulcers in the clinical history of diabetic neuropathy subjects influenced plantar pressure distribution, resulting in an increased load under the midfoot and rearfoot and an increase in the variability of plantar pressure during barefoot gait. The progression of diabetic neuropathy was not found to influence plantar pressure distribution.

OBJETIVO: Descrever e comparar as características antropométricas dos pés de sujeitos saudáveis e diabéticos neuropatas por meio de índices classificatórios do Arco Longitudinal Medial (ALM): Índice do Arco (IA), Índice de Chippaux-Cmirak (CSI) e Ângulo  (Â) e comparar a classificação destes métodos nestes grupos. MATERIAIS E MÉTODO: Grupo controle (GC) composto por 21 sujeitos saudáveis, e grupo diabético (GD), formado por 46 diabéticos portadores de neuropatia diabética. Pela impressão plantar foram calculados os índices. RESULTADOS: Houve maior proporção de pés planos no GD para os três índices (IA: 32,2%, CSI: 59,7%, A: 17,5%), enquanto os pés cavos comportaram-se de forma contrária. Os grupos foram estatisticamente diferentes em relação à proporção de pés planos no IA (p=0,0080) e no CSI (p=0,0000) e de pés cavos no  (p=0,0036). Houve diferença significativa quando comparados GC e GD para os três índices: IA (p=0,0027), CSI (p=0,0064),  (p=0,0296). CONCLUSÃO: Os dados demonstram alterações motoras e ortopédicas decorrentes da neuropatia periférica, responsável pela desestruturação do pé, levando ao desabamento do ALM. Observou-se que o ângulo A destoou fortemente da classificação do arco feita pelos outros dois índices, e com isso destacamos que sua utilização merece cuidado.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare foot anthropometry in healthy and diabetic subjects using Medial Longitudinal Arch (MLA) classificatory indexes: Arch Index (AI), Chippaux-Smirak Index (CSI) and  Angle (Â), as well as to compare the classification of these methods in each group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Control Group (CG) composed by 21 healthy subjects and Diabetic Group (DG), with 46 diabetic neuropathy subjects. The indexes were calculated from footprints. RESULTS: A larger proportion of flat feet was seen in DG for the three indexes (AI: 32,2%, CSI: 59,7%, A: 17,5%), while highly arched feet acted oppositely. The groups were statistically different for the proportion of flat feet in AI (p=0,0080) and CSI (p=0,0000) and high feet in  (p=0,0036). There were significant differences when compared GC and GD in the three indexes: IA (p=0,0027), CSI (p=0,0064),  (p=0,0296). CONCLUSION: Data showed motor and orthopedic changes originated by peripheral neuropathy, which is responsible for foot changes, causing longitudinal arch crumbling. It was seen that A Angle strongly disagreed when compared with the arch classification made by the other two indexes and therefore, its application needs care.