Resumo Este estudo descreve um método para identificar canais radiculares acessórios usando o software e-Vol DX em imagens de TCFC. Os canais radiculares acessórios constituem abrigos estratégicos aos micro-organismos presentes nas infecções endodônticas. A identificação destes pequenos canais em exames radiográficos periapicais apresenta limitações, além de apresentar baixa acessibilidade natural a ação dos instrumentos endodônticos e dos agentes antimicrobianos. Os canais acessórios apresentam diâmetros suficientes para ficarem visíveis em imagens de tomografia computadorizada de feixe cônico (TCFC) de alta resolução espacial. Porém, podem passar despercebidos ou até confundidos quando não ocorrer treinamento específico para este tipo de diagnóstico. A metodologia consiste em estabelecer finos slices (0,1 mm ou menor) obtidos a partir de cortes coronal, sagital e axial. O método consiste nos seguintes passos: ao encontrar uma linha hipodensa de um canal radicular principal em um corte tomográfico (axial, sagital ou coronal) deve-se ajustar as linhas de navegação da reconstrução multiplanar (MPR) para que fiquem paralelas ao canal principal e perpendiculares a esta linha hipodensa (correção de paralaxe). A seguir, depois de criterioso ajuste da imagem em busca do canal acessório, aparece invariavelmente como uma linha em um dos cortes tomográficos da MPR, outra linha em outro corte e um ponto no terceiro corte. Os três cortes da MPR apresentam imagens com a sequência linha-linha-ponto. Desta maneira, pode-se identificar um canal acessório e visualizá-lo em reconstrução volumétrica em filtro específico. Esta metodologia é fácil de ser aplicada e pode beneficiar o diagnóstico quando se deseja identificar canais radiculares acessórios e distingui-lo de linha de fratura radicular.

Abstract This study describes a methodology to identify accessory root canals using the e-Vol DX software in CBCT scans. Accessory root canals are strategic shelters for microorganisms present in root canal infections. The identification of these small canals in periapical radiographic exams has limitations, besides being markedly limited accessibility to the action of endodontic instruments and to the antimicrobial agents. A significant number of accessory canals have sufficient diameters to be visible on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of high spatial resolution. Therefore, it may go unnoticed or even confused when there is no specific training for this type of diagnosis. The methodology consists in establishing thin slices (0.1mm or smaller) obtained from coronal, sagittal and axial slices. The method consists of the following steps: during navigation along the long axis of a root canal when finding a possible hypodense line of main root canal in a tomographic section (axial, sagittal or coronal), the navigation software lines of the multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) must be adjusted so that they are parallel and perpendicular to the hypodense line (parallax correction). Then, after judiciously adjusted, the accessory canal image will invariably appear as a line on one of the MPR tomographic slices, another line on another slice, and a dot on the third slice. The three sections of the MPR present images with the “line-line-dot” sequence. In this way, it is possible to identify an accessory root canal and also visualize it in volumetric reconstruction in a specific filter. The application of this method is easy to employed and may benefit the diagnosis when you want to visualize accessory root canals and distinguish it from root fracture line.

Resumo O objetivo desta revisão crítica da literatura é discutir os fatores clínicos relevantes associados às fraturas radiculares FR visualizados por meio de um novo software de CBCT. As fraturas radiculares constituem uma ocorrência comum e um desafio na prática clínica, em que o diagnóstico torna-se essencial para a definição de uma tomada de decisão rápida e precisa. A caracterização da FR pode envolver diversos aspectos, como orientação da linha de fratura (horizontal, vertical, oblíqua), posição radicular da fratura (cervical, médio, apical), posição coronoradicular da fratura (coronária, coronorradicular, radicular), continuidade da fratura (trinca, fratura incompleta, completa), extensão óssea da fratura (supraóssea, nível ósseo, fratura infraóssea). Os exames de imagens têm sido usados rotineiramente para auxiliar no diagnóstico de RF. Mesmo com a tomografia computadorizada de feixe cônico (TCFC) de alta resolução, muitas vezes permanecem muitas dúvidas sobre o resultado do diagnóstico. São identificadas muitas interferências na análise da qualidade da imagem para determinar o diagnóstico, como a nitidez, o ruído, artefatos claros e escuros, dentre outros. O conhecimento do profissional é fundamental para identificar os diferentes padrões de linhas de fraturas e suas repercussões nos tecidos ósseos adjacentes, bem como para a análise de artefatos que podem ocultar ou apresentar semelhanças com as linhas de fraturas. As linhas de fraturas e fraturas radiculares que podem estar associadas às condições fantasmas que mimetizam fraturas devem ser analisadas cuidadosamente. A TCFC constitui o exame por imagem indicado para identificar uma fratura radicular. Acrescenta-se ao sucesso do diagnóstico o fato do profissional apresentar conhecimento científico, treinamento e domínio de softwares avançados de TCFC.

Abstract The objective of this critical review of literature is to discuss relevant clinical factors associated with root fractures (RF) visualized by using a new CBCT software. RF constitutes a common occurrence and a challenge in clinical practice, in which the diagnosis becomes essential for the definition of rapid and precise decision-making. The characterization of RF may involve different aspects, such as orientation of the fracture line (horizontal, vertical, oblique), root position of the fracture (cervical, middle, apical third), fracture's coronal-radicular position (coronary, coronal-radicular, radicular), continuity of the fracture (crack, incomplete fracture, complete), bone extension of the fracture (supraosseous, bone level, infraosseous fracture). Imaging examinations have been routinely used to aid in the RF diagnosis. Even with high-resolution cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans, many doubts often remain about the diagnostic outcome. Many interferences in the analysis of image quality to determine the diagnosis are identified, such as the sharpness, the noise, light and dark artifacts, among others. The professional's knowledge is essential for identifying the different patterns of fracture lines and their repercussions on adjacent bone tissues, as well as for the analysis of artifacts that may hide or show similarities to fracture lines. Fractures lines and root fractures that may be associated with phantom conditions that mimic fractures should be carefully analyzed. CBCT is the exam indicated to identify a root fracture. It is also added to the success of the diagnosis that the professional has scientific knowledge, training and mastery of advanced CBCT software.

Abstract Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is an essential imaging method that increases the accuracy of diagnoses, planning and follow-up of endodontic complex cases. Image postprocessing and subsequent visualization relies on software for three-dimensional navigation, and application of indexation tools to provide clinically useful information according to a set of volumetric data. Image postprocessing has a crucial impact on diagnostic quality and various techniques have been employed on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data sets. These include: multiplanar reformations (MPR), maximum intensity projection (MIP) and volume rendering (VR). A recent advance in 3D data visualization is the new cinematic rendering reconstruction method, a technique that generates photorealistic 3D images from conventional CT and MRI data. This review discusses the importance of CBCT cinematic rendering for clinical decision-making, teaching, and research in Endodontics, and a presents series of cases that illustrate the diagnostic value of 3D cinematic rendering in clinical care.

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the discrepancy of root canal filling (RCF) measurements obtained from original root specimens and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-two human maxillary anterior teeth were prepared up to an ISO #50 K-File 1 mm short of the apical foramen. Thus, the teeth were randomly divided into 8 groups, according to the root canal filling material: Sealapex ®, Sealapex®+gutta-percha points, Sealer 26®, Sealer 26®+gutta-percha points, AH PlusTM, AH PlusTM+gutta-percha points, Grossman Sealer, and Grossman Sealer+gutta-percha points. After root canal preparation and RCF, CBCT scans were acquired and the specimens were sectioned in axial, sagittal and coronal planes. The RCF measurements were obtained in different planes and thicknesses to determine the discrepancy between the original root specimens (using a digital caliper) and the CBCT images (using the scanner’s proprietary software). One-way analysis of variance and Tukey tests were used for statistical analyses. The significance level was set at α=5%. RESULTS: Measurements of the different endodontic filling materials were 9% to 100% greater on the CBCT images than on the original root specimens. Greater RCF dimensions were found when only sealers were used, with statistically significant difference among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: RCF dimensions were greater on CBCT images than on the original root specimens, especially when only sealer was used.