Abstract:
En
|
Text:
En
|
PDF:
En
Abstract Objective: This study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of Endoscopic Ultrasonography (EUS) for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched from the inception of the databases to June 2022. RevMan 5.3.0 software was utilized for data analysis. In total, 13 self-descriptive studies, which enrolled 382 patients, were finally included. Results It was revealed that EUS for the treatment of pancreatic cancer exhibited a lower incidence of adverse reactions (Relative Risk Ration [RR = 0.23], 95 % Confidence interval [95 % CI 0.23-0.23]), a higher success rate (RR = 0.90, 95 % CI 0.90-0.90), and a low failure rate (RR = 0.06, 95 % CI 0.06-0.06). Moreover, EUS-guided Celiac Plexus Neurolysis (EUS-CPN) not only significantly relieved pancreatic cancer patients’ pain (RR = 0.83, 95 % CI 0.83-0.83), but also significantly eliminated pain in some patients (RR = 0.09, 95 % CI 0.09-0.09). The effects of EUS on pancreatic cancer treatment were satisfactory, and few adverse reactions were found. Conclusion: Owing to the restricted sample size in this meta-analysis, primarily consisting of descriptive studies, it was imperative to conduct more rigorously designed, multi-center, long-term follow-up, larger sample, and Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) to validate the findings. Objective (EUS Methods PubMed Embase Science 2022 530 5 3 0 5.3. analysis total 1 selfdescriptive self studies 38 included Relative RR 0.23, 023 0.23 , 23 0.23] 9 [9 0.230.23, 023023 0.23-0.23]) 090 90 0.90 0.900.90, 090090 0.90-0.90) 006 06 0.06 0.060.06. 006006 . 0.06-0.06) Moreover EUSguided guided EUSCPN CPN (EUS-CPN 083 83 0.83 0.830.83, 083083 0.83-0.83) 009 09 0.09 0.090.09. 009009 0.09-0.09) satisfactory found Conclusion metaanalysis, metaanalysis meta analysis, meta-analysis designed multicenter, multicenter multi center, center multi-center longterm long term followup, followup follow up, up follow-up RCTs (RCTs findings 202 53 5.3 02 0.2 2 [ 230 0.230.23 02302 0.23-0.23] 0.9 900 0.900.90 09009 0.90-0.90 00 0.0 060 0.060.06 00600 0.06-0.06 08 8 0.8 830 0.830.83 08308 0.83-0.83 0.090.09 00900 0.09-0.09 20 5. 0. 0.230.2 0230 0.23-0.23 0.900.9 0900 0.90-0.9 0.060.0 0060 0.06-0.0 0.830.8 0830 0.83-0.8 0.090.0 0090 0.09-0.0 0.230. 0.23-0.2 0.900. 0.90-0. 0.060. 0.06-0. 0.830. 0.83-0. 0.090. 0.09-0. 0.230 0.23-0. 0.900 0.90-0 0.060 0.06-0 0.830 0.83-0 0.090 0.09-0 0.23-0 0.90- 0.06- 0.83- 0.09- 0.23-