Abstract:
En
|
Text:
En
|
PDF:
En
Abstract This cross-sectional study evaluated the association between salivary immunoglobulins, plaque index, and gingival index in Brazilian children with and without type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist for the reporting of observational studies was followed. The DM1 group had 38 children, and an equal number of volunteers matched by sex and age were recruited as controls. Clinical examination was performed for plaque index and gingival index determination. Non-stimulated whole saliva was collected. Concentrations of IgA, IgG, and IgM were determined by ELISA test. Data were tested by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Mann-Whitney, and Spearman tests and a multiple linear regression model (p<0.05) was performed. Gingival index was higher in the Control (DM1: 0.16±0.17; Control: 0.24±0.23, p=0.040). In DM1, there was a correlation between IgA and age (rho=0.371, p=0.024), IgM and IgG (rho=0.459, p=0.007), and IgM and gingival index (rho=0.394, p=0.014). In DM1, multiple linear regression showed that age (p=0.041; β=0.363), gingival index (p=0.041; β=0.398), and plaque index (p=0.008; β=-0.506) were good predictors of IgA levels in saliva. Thus, IgA was the only researched immunoglobulin that was directly associated with plaque and gingival indices in Brazilian children with DM1, but not in control subjects. crosssectional cross sectional immunoglobulins DM1. DM . (DM1) STROBE (STROBE followed 3 controls determination Nonstimulated Non stimulated collected test KolmogorovSmirnov, KolmogorovSmirnov Kolmogorov Smirnov, Smirnov Kolmogorov-Smirnov MannWhitney, MannWhitney Mann Whitney, Whitney Mann-Whitney p<0.05 p005 p 0 05 (p<0.05 (DM1 0.16±0.17 016017 16 17 024023 24 23 0.24±0.23 p=0.040. p0040 p=0.040 040 p=0.040) rho=0.371, rho0371 rho 371 (rho=0.371 p=0.024, p0024 p=0.024 , 024 p=0.024) rho=0.459, rho0459 459 (rho=0.459 p=0.007, p0007 p=0.007 007 p=0.007) rho=0.394, rho0394 394 (rho=0.394 p=0.014. p0014 p=0.014 014 p=0.014) p=0.041 p0041 041 (p=0.041 β=0.363, β0363 β β=0.363 363 β=0.363) β=0.398, β0398 β=0.398 398 β=0.398) p=0.008 p0008 008 (p=0.008 β=0.506 β0506 β= 0.506 506 β=-0.506 Thus subjects p<0.0 p00 (p<0.0 (DM 0.16±0.1 01601 02402 2 0.24±0.2 p004 p=0.04 04 rho=0.371 rho037 37 (rho=0.37 p002 p=0.02 02 rho=0.459 rho045 45 (rho=0.45 p000 p=0.00 00 rho=0.394 rho039 39 (rho=0.39 p001 p=0.01 01 (p=0.04 β036 β=0.36 36 β039 β=0.39 (p=0.00 β=0.50 β050 0506 0.50 50 β=-0.50 p<0. p0 (p<0. 0.16±0. 0160 0240 0.24±0. p=0.0 rho=0.37 rho03 (rho=0.3 rho=0.45 rho04 4 (rho=0.4 rho=0.39 (p=0.0 β03 β=0.3 β=0.5 β05 050 0.5 5 β=-0.5 p<0 (p<0 0.16±0 016 0.24±0 p=0. rho=0.3 rho0 (rho=0. rho=0.4 (p=0. β0 β=0. 0. β=-0. p< (p< 0.16± 0.24± p=0 rho=0. (rho=0 (p=0 β=0 β=-0 (p 0.16 0.24 p= rho=0 (rho= (p= β=- 0.1 0.2 rho= (rho