Urban development in South Africa has generally sustained and reproduced spatially unequal and exclusionary trends and outcomes particularly for the majority of the poor non-White populace. This article re-examines the urban redevelopment processes and ecosystems of South Africa to identify why this might be the case. Atuahene's 'dignity' concept and framework is adopted for this inquiry. Her framework posits the combination of systematic property deprivation, dehumanisation and infantilisation of poor non-White South Africans as evidence to theorise that the urban land situation in post-apartheid South Africa constitutes 'dignity takings' (DT) and demands a 'dignity restoration' (DR) response. This article explores the applicability and usefulness of this DT/DR framework in advancing more spatially just and inclusive frameworks and futures for South Africa. It does this by applying the framework to the dynamics of urban socio-spatial change in post-apartheid South Africa, with a focus on the phenomenon of gentrification and its exclusionary effects in four urban case vignettes. The lived experiences of these cases are used to demonstrate that there are both material and non-material aspects to unjust urban development, and that both types of deprivation require attention. The article proposes that gentrification can be viewed as 'dignity takings', as it strips residents of their sense of place, ownership, and access to a better quality of life. It is thus argued that policymakers could consider the DR/DT framework as an urban development lens through which to understand the unsuccessful attempts to merely accept, resettle, or compensate displaced residents, proposing DR as a means to fully redress - rather than reproduce - the injustices of the past. The DR/DT framework could contribute towards achieving South Africa's Integrated Urban Development Framework's transformation goal of having development policies and approaches that move towards systematic DR that includes spatial justice, sustainability, efficiency, resilience, and good administration.
Ka kakaretso, ntlafatso ea litoropo Afrika Boroa e tsitsisitse le ho hlahisa bocha mekhoa le liphetho tse senang tekatekano, tse qhelelang batho ba bangata ka thoko, haholo-holo Sechaba se futsanehileng sa batho ba bats'o. Sengoliloeng sena se etsa hlahlobo-bocha ea mekhoa ea ntlafatso ea litoropo le tikoloho ea Afrika Boroa. Sena se etsoa ho lekola se bakang ntlafatso e hlokang tekatekano. Mohopolo le moralo oa 'seriti' oa Atuahene o sebelisitsoe bakeng sa patlisiso ena. Moralo oa hae o tiisa kopano ea ho amohuoa thepa ka mokhoa o hlophisehileng, le ho nyenyefatsoa ha maAforika Boroa a futsanehileng ao e seng Makhooa. Sena o se sebelisa e le bopaki ba maikutlo a hore sebopeho sa litoropo ka mor'a puso ea khethollo ea Afrika Boroa ke 'se nkang seriti' sa baahi ('dignity takings' DT) 'me naha e hloka 'puseletso ea seriti' ('dignity restoration' DR). Sengoliloeng sena se hlahloba ts'ebetso le melemo ea moralo ona oa DT/DR ho ntsetseng pele meralo le bokamoso ba Afrika Boroa tse nang le toka, li bile li kenyeletsa bohle. Sena e se etsa ka ho sebelisa moralo ona ho lekola phetoho ea litoropo tsa Afrika Boroa ka mor'a puso ea khethollo, se tsepamisitse maikutlo holim'a ketsahalo ea 'gentrification' le litla-morao tsa eona litoropong tse 'ne tse khethiloeng. Litla-morao tseo baahi ba litotopo tsena ba tobaneng le tsona li sebelisoa e le mehlala e senolang lithloko tsa bona tse bonahalang le tse ipatileng, tse bakoang ke nts'etsopele e hlokang toka. Li boetse tse sebelisoa ho senola hore mefuta ena ea bohloki ka bobeli e hloka ho lokisoa. Sengoliloeng sena se fana ka maikutlo a hore ntlafatso ea 'gentrification' e ka talingoa e le 'ho nka seriti', kaha e amoha baahi maikutlo a bona a sebaka, borui, le phihlello ea bophelo bo betere. Kahona, sengoliloeng se sisinya hore bo ketsa-molao ba sebelise moralo oa DR/ DT ele lense ea nts'etsopele ea litoropo eo ka eona ho ka utloisisoang liteko tse sa atleheng tsa ho amohela, ho fallisa, kapa ho lefa baahi ba tlositsoeng mahaeng a bona. Ba sisinya hore ho fapana le ho atisa mokhoa oa puso e fetileng, DR e sebelisoe ho lokisa thlokahalo ea toka ka botlalo. DR/DT e ka kenya letsoho ho fihlelleng lipehelo tsa Moralo Kopanetsoeng oa Ntlafatso ea Litoropo Afrika Boroa, haholo tse shebaneng le ho tlisa toka, botsitso, bokhoni le le tsamaiso e ntle.
Stedelike ontwikkeling in Suid-Afrika het oor die algemeen ruimtelik ongelyke en uitsluitingstendense en uitkomste volgehou en weergegee, veral vir die meerderheid arm nie-Blanke bevolking. Hierdie artikel ondersoek weer die stedelike herontwikkelingsprosesse en ekosisteme van Suid-Afrika om te identifiseer hoekom dit die geval kan wees. Atuahene se 'waardigheid'-konsep en -raamwerk word vir hierdie ondersoek gebruik. Haar raamwerk stel die kombinasie van sistematiese eiendomsontneming, ontmensliking en infantilisering van arm nieBlanke Suid-Afrikaners as bewys om te teoretiseer dat die stedelike grondsituasie in post-apartheid Suid-Afrika uit 'waardigheidsneming' (DT) bestaan en 'waardigheidsherstel' (DR) vereis. Hierdie artikel ondersoek die toepaslikheid en bruikbaarheid van hierdie DT/DR-raamwerk om meer ruimtelik regverdige en inklusiewe raamwerke vir Suid-Afrika te bevorder. Die artikel doen dit deur die raamwerk toe te pas op die dinamika van stedelike sosio-ruimtelike verandering in postapartheid Suid-Afrika, met 'n fokus op die fenomeen van gentrifikasie en die uitsluitingseffekte daarvan in vier stedelike geval-vignette. Die geleefde ervarings van hierdie gevalle word gebruik om te demonstreer dat daar beide materiële en nie-materiële aspekte aan onregverdige stedelike ontwikkeling is, en dat beide tipes ontberings aandag verg. Die artikel stel voor dat gentrifikasie gesien kan word as 'waardigheidsnemings' aangesien dit inwoners ontneem van hul gevoel van plek, eienaarskap en toegang tot 'n beter lewensgehalte. Daar word dus geargumenteer dat beleidmakers die DR/DT-raamwerk kan beskou as 'n stedelike ontwikkelingslens waardeur die onsuksesvolle pogings om bloot ontneemde inwoners te aanvaar, hervestig of vergoed, deur DR voor te stel as 'n manier om die ongeregtighede van die verlede ten volle reg te stel eerder as om dit te reproduseer. Die DR/ DT-raamwerk kan bydra tot die bereiking van Suid-Afrika se Geïntegreerde Stedelike Ontwikkelingsraamwerk se transformasiedoelwit om ontwikkelings-beleide en -benaderings te hê wat na sistematiese waardigheidsherstel beweeg wat ruimtelike geregtigheid, volhoubaarheid, doeltreffendheid, veer-kragtigheid en goeie administrasie insluit.