RESUMEN En este artículo se buscará desarrollar un análisis de la teoría aristotélica de la sustancia, específicamente de la discusión en torno a su particularidad o universalidad. Primero revisaremos el planteamiento del problema tal como aparece en Categorías. Posteriormente, llevaremos la discusión a Metafísica, específicamente el libro Z, donde se puede encontrar una visión más desarrollada y elaborada de las ideas expuestas por el filósofo que en el Organon. A partir de allí revisaremos la visión universalista y particularista para evaluarlas en su mérito e intentar determinar cuál de las dos resulta ser más adecuada para la ontología aristotélica. Finalmente, se revisarán algunas posibles soluciones al problema de cognoscibilidad que presenta la visión particularista y se intentará dilucidar esos problemas a la luz de la aplicación que tiene cuando se transporta el conflicto al problema del alma en De Anima.

ABSTRACT In this paper, we seek to develop an analysis of the Aristotelian theory of substance, specifically of the discussion about its particularity or universality. We will first review the statement of the problem as it appears in Categories. We will then take the discussion to Metaphysics, specifically book Z, where a further developed and elaborated view of the ideas presented by the philosopher can be found compared to the Organon. From there we will review the universalist and particularist views to evaluate them on their merit and try to determine which of the two turns out to be more adequate for Aristotelian ontology. Finally, we will review some possible solutions to the problem of cognizability presented by the particularist view and attempt to clarify these problems in light of the application it has when the conflict is transposed to the problem of the soul in De Anima.

RESUMEN La modificación de la dialéctica que propone el planteamiento de Adorno despliega una crítica inmanente del principio identificatorio que emerge del conflicto entre componente somático y concepto, entre lo idéntico y lo no idéntico. Ello resulta fundamental para comprender la dominación como segunda naturaleza en las formaciones económico-sociales modernas/coloniales. En este trabajo proponemos, en primer lugar, examinar críticamente las relaciones de alteridad que estructuran la experiencia de lo político al interior de la modernidad/colonialidad, y la configuración de la subjetividad en términos sociohistóricos. En segundo lugar, se explora, desde un abordaje decolonial del horizonte analítico de Adorno, la constelación de mecanismos ideológicos vinculados al principio identitario que se condensa en la alteridad colonial, y que, como exponemos en este análisis, convergen finalmente en una metafísica del exterminio, en donde lo particular resulta subsumido por lo universal, y, que se efectualiza como una matriz de dominación en la que se articulan la experiencia de lo abyecto y los procesos de estereotipia que vertebran la construcción simbólica y racial de América.

ABSTRACT The modification of dialectics proposed by Adorno's approach displays an immanent critique of the identifying principle that emerges from the conflict between the somatic component and the concept, between identity and non-identity. This is essential to understand domination as second nature in modern/colonial social economic formations. In this paper, we propose, first of all, to critically examine the relationships of alterity that structure the experience of the political within modernity/ coloniality, and the sociohistorical configuration of subjectivity. Secondly, from a decolonial approach to Adorno's analytical horizon, we explore the constellation of ideological mechanisms linked to the identity principle that are condensed in colonial alterity, and, that, as we expose in this analysis, finally converge in a metaphysics of extermination, where the particular is subsumed by the universal, which is carried out as a matrix of domination in which the experience of the abject and the stereotyping processes that structure the symbolic and racial construction of America are articulated.

Abstract This paper analyses some problems in the university following the leitmotif of the link between the population as a whole and the institution. The critique, in the literal sense of dissection and discernment, aims to underline the boundary between those problems and the potential alternatives that a reflection on the foundations of the university may reveal. The steps to develop are, in the first place, the outline of the link between university and population according to their mutual influence. Secondly, the determination of the problems that the formation of the university usually presents to the people. Thirdly, the comprehension of the alternative, taking as an example the sense of the college degree and, in particular, the PhD. And, to conclude, based on what was previously exposed, the role of the philosophy inside the university.

Resumen Este artículo examina algunas problemáticas en la universidad siguiendo el hilo conductor de la relación entre la población en su conjunto y la institución. La crítica, en el sentido literal de disección o discernimiento, se propone subrayar el límite entre esos problemas y las alternativas potenciales que una reflexión sobre los fundamentos de la universidad pueda revelar. Los momentos a desarrollar son, en primer lugar, el esbozo de la relación entre universidad y población según su influencia mutua. En segundo lugar, la determinación de las problemáticas que para el pueblo suele presentar la formación de la universidad. En tercer lugar, la comprensión de la alternativa tomando como ejemplo el sentido del título universitario y, en concreto, el de doctor. Y, para concluir, el papel de la filosofía dentro de la universidad con base en lo previamente expuesto.

Abstract. In his first work, Kant discusses the possibility that more than one universe exists. Starting from the principle that substances have an essential force to act outside of themselves and that they are linked only in the exercise of this force, Kant concludes that the total set of substances linked to each other forms a universe. Nevertheless, it is perfectly possible that a substance exists without being linked to the substances of a certain universe, not being part of it, and that it is linked to other, alien substances, forming a separate universe with these. But the possibility of multiple universes requires that there be spaces of different natures or dimensionalities, so that such universes remain disconnected and are actually different universes and not distant parts of the same universe. This is because the nature of space depends on the kind of force with which the substances interact.

Resumen. En su primera obra, Kant discute la posibilidad de que exista más de un universo. Partiendo del principio de que las substancias tienen una fuerza esencial para actuar fuera de sí y de que ellas se vinculan solo en el ejercicio de esta fuerza, Kant concluye que la totalidad de las substancias vinculadas entre sí conforma un universo. Sin embargo, es perfectamente posible que una substancia exista sin estar vinculada con las substancias de un determinado universo, no formando parte de él, y que lo esté con otras substancias ajenas, conformando con ellas un universo aparte. Pero la posibilidad de múltiples universos requiere que haya espacios de distinta naturaleza o dimensionalidad para que tales universos se mantengan inconexos y sean realmente distintos universos y no partes distantes de un mismo universo. Esto sucede así porque la naturaleza del espacio depende específicamente de la fuerza con la que interactúan las substancias.

Resumen El presente trabajo tiene por finalidad constatar que Mariano Antonio Barrenechea (1884-1949) interpretaba la metafísica de artista propia de El nacimiento de la tragedia como una aprehensión superficial o impropia dentro del pensamiento nietzscheano. Con vistas a tal fin, el argumento desplegado en el escrito se orienta a los siguientes objetivos: 1) sondear los alcances del conocimiento que Barrenechea tenía de las tesis centrales de la obra sobre la tragedia; 2) reconstruir la interpretación barrenechiana según la cual la irrupción de Wagner en la vida de Nietzsche constituye una torsión de los proyectos helenistas originales del filólogo; 3) analizar la lectura de Barrenechea sobre algunos fragmentos póstumos en los que Nietzsche pone en tela de juicio la posibilidad misma del drama musical wagneriano.

Abstract. This paper analyzes the foreword to the Science of Logic (WdL) from 1812. It answers the following questions: what is WdL about? What is the logic in the Science of Logic? Is the term “logic” just a substitute for “metaphysics” or, rather, is WdL the inception of a completely new discipline, quite different from metaphysics in the traditional sense? I reach the conclusion that, in WdL, logic is the development of the concept expressed as social freedom.

Resumen. Este artículo analiza el prólogo de 1812 a la Ciencia de la lógica (WdL) y responde a los planteos: ¿de qué trata esta obra?, ¿qué hay de lógico en la expresión “lógica”?, ¿es ”lógica” un nombre sustituto para “metafísica” o, más bien, la WdL es la inauguración de una disciplina completamente nueva y que dista de la metafísica en el sentido tradicional? Concluyo que la lógica es aquí el desarrollo del concepto expresada como libertad social.

Abstract. This paper offers a systematic and doxographical reconstruction of the phenomena of delay and lateness in Martin Heidegger’s thought between 1919 and 1930. In the first section, we trace the ambiguities that permeate the nominalization and formalization of delay in order to thematize immediately after the disruptive structure of four modes of delay understood as constitutive within Heidegger’s early work. We account for the way in which delay carries an illuminating potential that phenomenologically ensures the evidencing of the constituent dimension. In the second section, we descend to the immanent transformations of Heidegger’s philosophy in order to account for two possibilities of philosophy’s self-understanding on the basis of delay and lateness, precisely from two modes of relation with the constituent dimension of the appearing: on the one hand, a mode marked by crepuscular lateness, and on the other hand, an executive mode based on auroral delay.

Resumen. El presente artículo tiene por fin ofrecer una reconstrucción sistemático-doxográfica de los fenómenos de la demora y de la tardanza en el pensamiento de Martin Heidegger entre 1919 y 1930. En la primera sección de este escrito rastrearemos las ambigüedades que penetran en la nominalización y formalización de la demora, para inmediatamente tematizar la estructura disruptiva de cuatro modos de la demora entendida a título constituyente dentro de la obra temprana de Heidegger. Lo que nos interesará es dar cuenta del modo en que la demora porta un potencial desocultante que asegura fenomenológicamente la evidenciación de la dimensión constituyente. En la segunda sección del ensayo, bajaremos a las transformaciones inmanentes de la filosofía de Heidegger para dar cuenta de dos posibilidades de la auto-comprensión de la filosofía a partir de la demora y de la tardanza, precisamente desde dos modos de relación con la dimensión constituyente del aparecer. Por una parte, un modo marcado por la tardanza crepuscular, y por otra parte, un modo ejecutivo basado en la demora auroral.

Levinas mainly deals with the notion of eschatology in the preface of Totalité et infini (1961). There it appears in the context of his agreement with an entire tradition of philosophers claiming that the very nature of being is one of violence and war, which becomes manifest in the pervasive waging of political battles and wars. He further contends that a conception of morality based on the "pure subjectivism of the I" is powerless to shield humankind against such violence. The alternative he offers to such an impotent morality is an ethics of alterity. Eschatology is Levinas's answer to how such an ethics of alterity would be capable of insulating humankind against calculative reason and the pressures of politics and war. To understand how eschatology succeeds in doing so and how Levinas fills in the notion, I argue that it should be understood within the context of his conceptualisation of time. Levinas offers novel analyses of the forms and the work of time. Time, in Levinas, is the very inner structure of an existent's movement of existing - I refer in this regard to the inherent chronological inconsistency of the human condition. In Levinas's ethical metaphysics this inherent chronological inconsistency is theorised as the other (autre) within the self, an affective infection that dates back to a past that has never been present - it hails from the diachronic time of the Other - and is opened to the future, "to the newness of the unknown". While this past is impossible to grasp, it nevertheless concerns me. I cannot remain unaffected in relation to it; it has left a trace. This alterity within the self becomes manifest as an inherent Desire for time, time that can only be given by the other person, which for Levinas is the Other (l'Autrui). This means that the singular time of my being is not yet time, does not yet have time, but the singular I bears an inherent Desire for time within. This Desire for time, then, emanates from the inherent chronological inconsistency which typifies the existent being "out of sync" with itself, a diastasis or a "standing apart from itself. To be sure, this Desire is not a need to be filled, but as Desire, it is essentially insatiable. This Desire conquers the ecstatic time of need and satisfaction and the inevitable return to the self, the collapse back upon oneself that follows when needs are satiated, and the return of the unbearable heaviness of being that it signals. The early Levinas (De l'évasion, 1935) was looking for an escape from this irremediable Being. Only four decades later in Autrement qu'être ou au-delà de l'essence (1974) will Levinas come to fully plot out "a new path out of being," a temporal path that he started to chart in Le temps et l' autre (1948), which forges a fundamental link between time and ethics. The time that the future brings is not merely the recurrence of the present instant or its continuation, but the possibility of another instant or a new beginning. How can an existent in the instant recommence otherwise? The coming of the future announces another original instant that cannot be approached but that comes; that cannot be assumed, since it appears as an epiphany. The existent is able to welcome the absolutely strangeness of the epiphany of the future because of the inherent susceptibility to fraternity and sociality, which is made possible by time. This, however, is not time that the existent has like a possession but a capacity to welcome time that springs from an existential chronological inconsistency - a being temporally out of joint. To further specify, this "capacity" is not a power that the individual instant is endowed with. Quite to the contrary, faced with the radical strangeness of the future, with the alterity of the face of the Other, the existent is reduced to a "radical passivity. " Passivity is the radix or root of ethical agency. The capacity that time gives, is the capacity for generosity, the power to be able to give of the riches accumulated. This is not to turn away from one's egotistical selfish life once and for all, but a being turned to be able to welcome the Other without being obliterated in the face of an absolute Mystery. The instant as an interruption announces the possibility of a new beginning, which is not the effacement of the past, but the pardon that purifies the past and the injustices committed. Pardon consists in a retroactive action that inverts the natural temporal order of things and implies the "reversibility of time". Now the past instant has not passed but can be lived again, differently. In Levinas we find a non-teleological conception of time. Truth, Levinas contends, requires both an infinite time and a completed time conceived as "messianic time". Messianic time, more precisely, may be conceived as the "extreme vigilance of the messianic consciousness", since it is only such vigilant consciousness that can protect us against the revenge of evil -which infinite time cannot do. This notion of "messianic consciousness" is encapsulated in Levinas's conceptualisation of eschatology, which is the infinity beyond totality or beyond history, without denying history. The eschatological is not realised at the end of time but rather in each instant in which our responsibility vis-a-vis the Other is realised. If this responsibility exempts us from the jurisdiction of history and the future, salvation is not to be found at the end of history but remains at each moment possible. When Levinas speaks of eschatology in Totalité et Infini he does not refer to a doctrine but to a vision: "the eschatological vision" that consummates moral experience. It is not a spiritual relationship; it leads to action. To see (envision) is already to act. This action is evoked in feeling responsible in the face of the future one hopes for others. The future one hopes for others - a better future - is the eschatological vision realised in the eruption of the present as a purified past.

In hierdie essay word die plek van eskatologie in Levinas se tydsbegrip krities onder die loep geneem. Daar word aangevoer dat Levinas se nadruklike aandrang in Totalité et infini (1961), naamlik dat eskatologie etiese verantwoordelikheid fasiliteer, nie onafhanklik van sy konsep-tualisering van tyd verstaan kan word nie. Eskatologie in Levinas is nie die leer van die laaste dinge nie, maar die verklaring wat Levinas bied vir hoe 'n etiek van alteriteit daartoe in staat is om die mensdom teen die geweld van berekende rede en die druk van politiek en oorlog te beskerm. Hoe eskatologie presies hierin slaag, word uiteengesit aan die hand van Levinas se oorspronklike analises van die vorms en werk van tyd.

Abstract In this article, when there are now new perspectives in the Writing of History and the “reflexive turn” and the “historiographic turn” allow the “Theory of history as Historiography” to be forged one more possibility, a desire, a promise whose access key is. It is necessary to know what you want, to do with the notion of Archaeo-writing. Historicize the temporal plurality of the Theory of History from the question: What can we expect in the deferred writings of Archaeo-writing? Expect equivocal writings in Derridean key of the Theory of History as Historiography. An impossible possibility yesterday. Writings created to examine the metaphysics of presence in historiography, knowing that they will not be able to formulate a “Theory of History” with the sole Derridean signature because “the real” resists being domesticated and incorporated into a single theoretical thought.

Resumen Cuando ahora las formas de hacer historia materializan una multiplicidad de grafías, y el giro reflexivo y el giro historiográfico nos permiten idear las historias de las teorías de la historia en una posibilidad más, en este ensayo se presenta un deseo, una promesa cuya llave de acceso precisa saber lo que pretende la locución arqueoescritura. Esbozos y trazas de la teoría de la historia en cuestión: ¿qué cabe esperar en las escrituras diferidas de la arqueoescritura? Escrituras equívocas en clave derridiana de la teoría de la historia como historiografía. Una posibilidad imposible aplazada. Escrituras para examinar la metafísica de la presencia en la historiografía, conscientes de que no podrán formular una teoría de la historia en la única firma derridiana, porque lo real se resiste a ser domado e incorporado al impar filosófico derridiano.

Abstract The article aims to analyze the structure of characters in the film screenplay Amapola by Jorge Acha drawing a parallelism with the tricotomic cosmological structure proposed by Charles Sanders Peirce. Likewise, the vegetal metaphysics of Maurice Maeterlinck and Emanuele Coccia are recovered, especially in their conception of the flower as a mediating element between the terrestrial and the aerial, and what this hypothesis has of similarity with the Peircean conception and, therefore, according to our proposal, with that of Acha’s script. Thus, we proceed methodologically by explaining and arguing the similarities between the cosmologies of the analyzed text and the proposed philosophical sources. In this way, the essay seeks to show how the script has a form based on oppositions with continuity between its parts that bring it closer, in that sense, to the baroque aesthetic and differentiate it from the oppositions without continuity that structure the dominant thought and worldview in the West.

Resumen El artículo se propone analizar la estructura de personajes del guion cinematográfico Amapola de Jorge Acha trazando un paralelismo con la estructura cosmológica tricotómica propuesta por Charles Sanders Peirce. Asimismo, se recuperan las metafísicas vegetales de Maurice Maeterlinck y Emanuele Coccia, sobre todo en su concepción de la flor como elemento mediador entre lo terrestre y lo aéreo, y lo que esta hipótesis tiene de semejanza con la concepción peirceana y, por lo tanto, según es nuestra propuesta, con la del guion de Acha. Así, se procede metodológicamente por la explicitación y argumentación de similitudes entre las cosmologías del texto analizado y de las fuentes filosóficas propuestas. De este modo, el ensayo busca mostrar cómo el guion posee una forma basada en oposiciones con continuidad entre sus partes que lo acercan, en ese sentido, a la estética barroca y lo diferencian de las oposiciones sin continuidad que estructuran el pensamiento y la cosmovisión dominantes en Occidente.

Resumo Neste ensaio, propomos uma investigação da obra de Jorge Luis Borges como uma resposta à atual crise de imaginação, proclamada como o problema central dos “tempos pós-normais” e destacada de outras perspectivas (ecocrítica, educação, pós-humanismo). O objetivo principal é examinar diferentes formas de pensar e imaginar discerníveis na obra de Borges, “outro inquisidor” em busca de heresias maravilhosas. A estrutura teórica da análise baseia-se nos textos noológicos de Deleuze sobre o conceito de “jogo ideal” (pensamento anti-metafísico heterodoxo que conceitua a diferença e o nonsense) e na patafísica, proclamada por ele como o único termo geral que corresponde a todas as tentativas de superar a metafísica. Propomos a tese de que o modo divergente e paradoxal de pensar e imaginar em Borges, entre a literatura, a ciência e a filosofia, é um tipo de patafísica, necessária para enfrentar a “pós-normalidade”. ensaio imaginação tempos pósnormais pós normais pós-normais ecocrítica, ecocrítica (ecocrítica educação póshumanismo. póshumanismo humanismo . pós-humanismo) outro inquisidor maravilhosas baseiase baseia se jogo ideal pensamento antimetafísico anti metafísico nonsense patafísica metafísica literatura filosofia pósnormalidade. pósnormalidade normalidade “pós-normalidade” pós-humanismo “pós-normalidade

Abstract In this essay we propose an investigation of the work of Jorge Luis Borges as a response to the current crisis of imagination, which has been proclaimed as the central problem of “postnormal times” and also singled-out from other perspectives (ecocriticism, education, posthumanism). The main aim is to examine diverse ways of thinking and imagining that are discernible in the work of Borges, “other inquisitor” in search of marvelous heresies. The theoretical framework of the analysis is based on Deleuze’s noological texts on the concept of the “ideal game” (a heterodox anti-metaphysical thought that conceptualizes difference and nonsense) and on pataphysics, which was proclaimed by Deleuze as the only general term that corresponds to all attempts to overcome metaphysics. We propose the thesis that the divergent, paradoxical way of thinking and imagining in Borges, between literature, science and philosophy, is a type of pataphysics, necessary to confront “postnormality”. imagination postnormal times singledout singled out ecocriticism, ecocriticism (ecocriticism education posthumanism. posthumanism . posthumanism) inquisitor heresies Deleuzes s ideal game antimetaphysical anti metaphysical nonsense pataphysics metaphysics divergent literature philosophy postnormality. postnormality “postnormality” “postnormality

Resumen En este ensayo proponemos una investigación de la obra de Jorge Luis Borges como respuesta a la actual crisis de la imaginación, proclamada como el problema central de los “tiempos posnormales” y subrayada también desde otras perspectivas (ecocrítica, educación, posthumanismo). El objetivo principal es examinar diferentes modos de pensar e imaginar perceptibles en la obra de Borges, “otro inquisidor” en búsqueda de herejías maravillosas. El marco teórico del análisis está basado en los textos noológicos de Deleuze sobre el concepto del “juego ideal” (heterodoxo pensamiento antimetafísico que conceptualiza la diferencia y el sinsentido) y sobre la patafísica, proclamada por él como único término general que corresponde a todos los intentos de superar la metafísica. Proponemos la tesis de que el divergente, paradójico modo de pensar e imaginar en Borges, entre la literatura, la ciencia y la filosofía, es un tipo de patafísica, necesaria para afrontar la posnormalidad. imaginación tiempos posnormales ecocrítica, ecocrítica (ecocrítica educación posthumanismo. posthumanismo . posthumanismo) otro inquisidor maravillosas juego ideal heterodoxo sinsentido patafísica metafísica divergente literatura filosofía posnormalidad

ABSTRACT The civilizational turn of modernity, which still marks us, raises an enormous challenge to the Christians faith. Starting from the thesis that there is always a philosophy present in theology, Libanio faced this issue both in relation to his first formulation in European modernity, also present among us, and the specific situation in Latin America, confronting the classical metaphysics usually used in theology and assuming the philosophy of subjectivity and the philosophy of liberation. The change in the contemporary philosophical scenario raises fundamental questions for theology. modernity us faith America liberation

RESUMO A reviravolta civilizacional da modernidade, que ainda nos marca, levanta um enorme desafio à fé cristã. Partindo da tese de que há sempre uma filosofia presente na teologia, Libanio enfrentou esta questão tanto em relação à sua formulação primeira na modernidade europeia, também presente entre nós, quanto à situação específica da América Latina, confrontando-se com a metafísica clássica, usualmente utilizada na teologia, e assumindo a filosofia da subjetividade e a filosofia da libertação. A mudança do cenário filosófico contemporâneo levanta novas questões fundamentais à teologia. marca cristã teologia europeia nós Latina confrontandose confrontando se clássica libertação

ABSTRACT The concept of Quilombism developed by Abdias Nascimento is frequently used by social movements. This work intends to analyze how this concept is constructed, having as a hypothesis that it is based on the concept of mythopoeia, developed in Wole Soyinka’s metaphysics of the Yoruba artist. movements constructed mythopoeia Soyinkas Soyinka s artist

RESUMO O conceito de quilombismo criado por Abdias Nascimento é muito utilizado pelos movimentos sociais. Este trabalho pretende analisar como esse conceito é construído, tendo como hipótese que ele se ampara no conceito de mitopoesia, desenvolvido na metafísica do artista iorubá de Wole Soyinka. sociais construído mitopoesia Soyinka

Abstract: How does feminist metaphysics inform the ontological commitments of feminist International Relations? Since feminisms entered into IR, debates over epistemology and methodology have dominated discussions among feminists in the discipline. Reflections on ontology, especially on gender as a kind, seem to be subsumed under the notion of social construction. However, exactly what and how gender is constructed deserves further exploration in feminist IR research. In this article, I propose a dialogue between Philosophy and IR, aiming to provide a feminist metaphysics for the ontology of gender. I mobilise Ásta’s conferring framework to ground the explanation of gender as social construction that serves the interests of feminists in IR, and I exemplify its use through the debate between empiricist and critical feminists.

Résumé : Comment la métaphysique féministe informe-t-elle les compromis ontologiques des féminismes dans les relations internationales (RI) ? Depuis l’apparition des féminismes dans le RI, les débats sur l’épistémologie et la méthodologie ont eu prévalence dans les discussions entre les féministes de cette discipline. Les réflexions sur l’ontologie, en particulier sur le genre en tant que catégorie, semblent se résoudre autour de la notion de construction sociale. Néanmoins, ce qu’est exactement et comment se construit le genre est une question qui demande une plus ample exploration dans la recherche féministe des RI, dans le but d’apporter une métaphysique féministe à l’ontologie du genre. Je me sers du modèle d’attribution d’Asta pour servir de base à une explication des mécanismes de construction sociale du genre qui concernent les féministes dans les RI, et j’exemplifie leur utilisation par le débat entre féministes empiristes et critiques.

Resumen: ¿Cómo la metafísica feminista informa los compromisos ontológicos de los feminismos en las Relaciones Internacionales (RI)? Desde la entrada de los feminismos en las RI, los debates sobre epistemología y metodología han dominado las discusiones entre las feministas de la disciplina. Las reflexiones sobre la ontología, en especial sobre el género como categoría, parecen resolverse en torno a la noción de construcción social. Sin embargo, exactamente qué y cómo se construye el género merece una mayor exploración en la investigación feminista de las RI. En este artículo, establezco un diálogo entre la Filosofía y las RI con el objetivo de aportar una metafísica feminista para la ontología del género. Recurro al modelo de atribución de Ásta para sustentar una forma de explicar los mecanismos de construcción social del género que interesan a las feministas en las RI y ejemplifico su uso a través del debate entre feministas empiricistas y críticas.

Abstract Process metaphysics is both internally coherent and coherent with what we know about the basic ‘what there is’ of the world, whereas a particle-as-particular metaphysics is neither. One consequence of a process metaphysics is that metaphysical emergence becomes explicable, and, in turn, normative emergence. This point is developed with models of the emergence of normative function and of representation. These are steps toward an integrated naturalistic understanding of the world. world particleasparticular particle as particular neither explicable turn representation