ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the extent to which orthodontic treatment need is perceived by the patients and by the orthodontist, as well as the possible impacts on the OHRQoL (Oral Health-Related Quality of Life) over the course of conventional orthodontic treatment in adolescent patients. Methods: The sample consisted of 55 adolescents. The perception of patients and orthodontists relative to the malocclusion was evaluated by the IOTN (Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need). The OHRQoL was evaluated by the Child-OIDP (Child-Oral Impacts on Daily Performances) questionnaire before the conventional orthodontic appliance was bonded (T0); and at the following time intervals: after one week (T1), one month (T2), three months (T3), six months (T4), and after the end of orthodontic treatment (T5). Results: Adolescents who had large orthodontic treatment needs had a poor OHRQoL, according to their self-perception (p=0.003) and according to the orthodontist’s perception (p<0.001), when compared with patients with small and moderate needs. There was statistically significant difference in the OHRQoL between the time intervals T0 and T1 (p=0.021), T2 and T3 (p<0.001), T3 and T4 (p=0.033), and T0 and T5 (p<0.002). At the end of treatment, all evaluated participants reported an improvement in OHRQoL. Conclusions: It was concluded that adolescents and orthodontists agreed with regard to the perception of orthodontic treatment need. In the first week and in the first month of orthodontic treatment, there was a negative impact on the OHRQoL. After three months, an improvement of OHRQoL was detected, which has progressed over time. Objective orthodontist Oral HealthRelated Health Related Life Methods 5 Index Need. Need . Need) ChildOIDP Child OIDP ChildOral Performances T (T0) T1, , (T1) T2, (T2) T3, (T3) T4, (T4) T5. (T5) Results selfperception self p=0.003 p0003 p 0 003 (p=0.003 s p<0.001, p0001 p<0.001 001 (p<0.001) p=0.021, p0021 p=0.021 021 (p=0.021) p=0.033, p0033 p=0.033 033 (p=0.033) p<0.002. p0002 p<0.002 002 (p<0.002) Conclusions detected (T0 (T1 (T2 (T3 (T4 (T5 p=0.00 p000 00 (p=0.00 p<0.00 (p<0.001 p002 p=0.02 02 (p=0.021 p003 p=0.03 03 (p=0.033 (p<0.002 (T p=0.0 p00 (p=0.0 p<0.0 (p<0.00 (p=0.02 (p=0.03 p=0. p0 (p=0. p<0. (p<0.0 p=0 (p=0 p<0 (p<0. p= (p= p< (p<0 (p (p<
RESUMO Objetivo: O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o quanto a necessidade de tratamento ortodôntico é percebida pelos pacientes e pelo ortodontista, bem como os possíveis impactos na Qualidade de Vida Relacionada à Saúde Bucal (QVRSB) ao longo do tratamento ortodôntico convencional em pacientes adolescentes. Métodos: A amostra foi composta por 55 adolescentes. A percepção dos pacientes e ortodontistas em relação à má oclusão foi avaliada pelo Índice de Necessidade de Tratamento Ortodôntico (IOTN). A QVRSB foi avaliada pelo questionário Child-OIDP (Child-Oral Impacts on Daily Performances) antes da colagem do aparelho ortodôntico convencional (T0); e nos seguintes intervalos de tempo: após uma semana (T1), um mês (T2), três meses (T3), seis meses (T4) e após o término do tratamento ortodôntico (T5). Resultados: Adolescentes que apresentavam grandes necessidades de tratamento ortodôntico apresentaram baixa QVRSB, segundo sua autopercepção (p=0,003) e segundo a percepção do ortodontista (p<0,001), quando comparados com pacientes com necessidades pequenas e moderadas . Houve diferença estatisticamente significativa na QVRSB entre os intervalos de tempo T0 e T1 (p=0,021), T2 e T3 (p<0,001), T3 e T4 (p=0,033) e T0 e T 5 (p<0,00 2 ). Ao final do tratamento, todos os participantes avaliados relataram melhora na QVRSB. Conclusões: Concluiu-se que adolescentes e ortodontistas concordaram quanto à percepção da necessidade de tratamento ortodôntico. Na primeira semana e no primeiro mês de tratamento ortodôntico, houve impacto negativo na QVRSB. Após três meses, foi detectada uma melhora na QVRSB, que progrediu ao longo do tempo. Objetivo (QVRSB Métodos IOTN. IOTN (IOTN) ChildOIDP Child OIDP ChildOral Oral Performances (T0) T1, , (T1) T2, (T2) T3, (T3) (T4 T5. T5 (T5) Resultados p=0,003 p0003 p 0 003 (p=0,003 p<0,001, p0001 p<0,001 001 (p<0,001) p=0,021, p0021 p=0,021 021 (p=0,021) p=0,033 p0033 033 (p=0,033 p<0,00 p000 00 (p<0,0 ) Conclusões Concluiuse Concluiu se (IOTN (T0 (T1 (T2 (T3 (T (T5 p=0,00 (p=0,00 (p<0,001 p002 p=0,02 02 (p=0,021 p=0,03 p003 03 (p=0,03 p<0,0 p00 (p<0, p=0,0 (p=0,0 (p=0,02 p<0, p0 (p<0 p=0, (p=0, p<0 (p< p=0 (p=0 p< (p p= (p=