Resumen: El artículo estudia la experiencia de las judías castellanas durante el siglo XV con el objetivo de analizar las modalidades de su intervención ante diferentes jurisdicciones. A través de un examen cualitativo de documentación judicial se abordan las problemáticas y conflictividades que las atravesaban, así como las estrategias agenciadas para sortearlas. Pese a que existían formas de subordinación de género específicas dadas por la identidad religiosa, no eran óbice para que protagonizaran litigios o participaran en la formulación de reclamos colectivos. Los estereotipos de género fueron manipulados según el contexto y los objetivos requeridos por cada justiciable. En su experiencia judicial, los condicionantes y las estrategias propias de su identidad judía tuvieron un lugar relevante. Resumen jurisdicciones atravesaban sortearlas religiosa colectivos justiciable relevante

Abstract: This article studies the experience of Jewish women in Castile during the 15th century with the aim of analyzing the modalities of their intervention in different jurisdictions. Through a qualitative examination of legal documentation, we address the problems and conflicts that affected them, as well as the strategies used to overcome these difficulties. Despite the existence of specific forms of gender subordination due to religious identity, this did not prevent them from taking part in litigation or participating in claims both on behalf of and as part of the collective. Gender stereotypes were manipulated according to the context and the objectives required by each litigant. In their judicial experience, the conditioning factors and strategies inherent to their Jewish identity played an important role. Abstract th jurisdictions documentation difficulties collective litigant role

This article provides an overall assessment on the justiciability of economic, social and cultural rights (ESCRs) within the legal system of South Sudan. It establishes that, in theory, ESCRs are justiciable under the legal system of South Sudan in a complementary and collaborative manner at two levels, namely, the national and supranational. The article argues that ESCRs may in theory be legally and judicially enforceable by virtue of the Constitution and domestic legislation. Furthermore, ESCRs are justiciable by virtue of the automatic incorporation of numerous treaties into the Bill of Rights in the Constitution, with these treaties also effecting justiciability as part of the international treaty obligations of South Sudan. It further asserts that there are two parallel layers, national and supranational, which give effect to the legal realisation of ESCRs in South Sudan. This is presented through numerous domestic constitutional and legal provisions, and also international and regional treaty obligations of South Sudan. For that purpose, the article appraises relevant provisions in the Constitution, domestic laws, and United Nations and regional treaties to which South Sudan is a state party. In addition, the article examines a number of bodies and entities that are established by these frameworks to operationalise the enforcement of ESCRs. The article concludes that this composite situation forms a basis for all the instruments and structures to supplement and complement one another in a non-hierarchical perspective. The view expressed in the article is that the current status remains theoretical and is empirically and practically challenged by the factual realities that hinder and hamper the operationalisation of justiciability in South Sudan. It recommends that a practical test is required in order for a comprehensive legal jurisprudence about the justiciability of ESCRs in and for South Sudan to materialise.

Twenty-four years after the establishment of the fourth republic and the Constitution that ushered in the democratic regime in Nigeria, the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, socio-economic rights remain non-justiciable. Efforts by human rights organisations, academics and the bench (both within the country and regionally) have led to the design and development of various theories to support the measured enforcement of socio-economic rights. One such principle is the principle of minimum core obligations. This principle enjoins states to strive to satisfy the basic levels of these socio-economic rights. Despite these efforts, Nigeria and most African countries are still many years away from the sustainable realisation of socio-economic rights. There are a plethora of journal articles and textbook pages examining why this is so, but one thing remains certain, namely, that socio-economic rights cannot be enforced in the absence of adequate fiscal resources. While states have many sources of raising revenue, development practitioners have long realised that taxation remains the most sustainable way for governments to raise revenue. Thus, beyond the rights framework developed to ensure the promotion and protection of minimum core obligations, taxation remains a critical consideration to the realisation of this objective. This article addresses the scope of minimum core obligations and analyses the roles and limitations of taxation as a means of sustainably realising minimum core obligations in Nigeria. It argues that illicit financial flows, corruption and a large informal economy, among others, tend to affect the ability of the government to raise revenues, and that there is a direct link between these problems and an inadequate socio-economic rights framework in Nigeria. Implicit in the obligation to respect, protect, and fulfil the essential minimum standards of these socio-economic rights is the obligation of the government to mobilise domestic resources for the protection and promotion of socio-economic rights.

Summary: Given the fragmentary and uneven development of Mercosur, the adoption of the Mercosur Socio-Labour Declaration has been a bold attempt to protect workers’ fundamental rights within a regional trade bloc. It was first adopted in 1998 and then substantially revisited in 2015. This article explores how Mercosur bodies and, particularly, national judges and their activism have circumvented the current intergovernmental institutional framework to consider the Socio-Labour Declaration as a justiciable instrument. This has allowed workers and citizens to rely upon it to challenge domestic legislations and protect their fundamental rights in the workplace. This piece concludes that an already overdue revision should not only reform the legal nature of the Socio-Labour, which should become a protocol to the Treaty of Asuncion, but should also regulate two crucial areas that are already shaping the Mercosur Member States’ labour markets, namely: platform work, and climate change with a particular focus on green jobs and just transition policies.

Résumé: Étant donné le développement fragmentaire et inégal du Mercosur, l›adoption de la Déclaration Socio-Laboral du Mercosur a été une tentative courageuse de protéger les droits fondamentaux des travailleurs au sein d’un bloc régional de libre-échange. Elle a été adoptée en 1998, puis largement révisée en 2015. Cet article étudie comment les instances du Mercosur et, en particulier, les juges nationaux et leur activisme judiciaire, ont contourné le cadre institutionnel intergouvernemental actuel pour considérer la Déclaration Socio-Laboral comme un instrument juridique justiciable. Cela a permis aux travailleurs et aux citoyens de s’appuyer sur la Déclaration pour contester les législations nationales et protéger leurs droits fondamentaux. Cet article conclut qu’une révision déjà nécessaire ne devrait pas seulement réformer la nature juridique de la Déclaration Socio-Laboral, qui devrait devenir un protocole du Traité d’Asunción, mais devrait également réglementer deux domaines cruciaux qui façonnent déjà les marchés du travail des États membres du Mercosur, à savoir: le travail des plateformes numériques, et le changement climatique, en mettant particulièrement l’accent sur les emplois verts et les politiques de transition juste.

Resumo: Considerando a natureza fragmentada e desigual do desenvolvimento do Mercosul, a adoção da Declaração Socio-Laboral do Mercosul foi uma tentativa audaciosa de proteger os direitos fundamentais dos trabalhadores dentro de um bloco comercial regional. O documento foi inicialmente adotado em 1998 e posteriormente revisado de forma substancial em 2015. Este artigo explora como os órgãos do Mercosul e, em particular, os juízes nacionais e seu ativismo, contornaram o atual quadro institucional intergovernamental para considerar a Declaração Socio-Laboral como um instrumento passível para a utilização em decisões judiciais. Isso permitiu que trabalhadores e cidadãos a utilizassem para contestar legislações domésticas e proteger seus direitos fundamentais no ambiente de trabalho. Este artigo conclui que uma revisão já atrasada não só deve reformar a natureza legal da Declaração Socio-Laboral, que deveria se tornar um protocolo para o Tratado de Assunção, mas também regulamentar duas áreas cruciais que já estão moldando os mercados de trabalho dos Estados Membros do Mercosul, a saber: trabalho em plataformas e mudanças climáticas, com um foco especial em empregos verdes e políticas de transição justa.

Resumen: En el marco de un desarrollo fragmentado e irregular a lo largo de la historia del Mercosur, la Declaración Sociolaboral ha sido un intento ambicioso de consagrar y proteger los derechos fundamentales de los trabajadores y, en cierta medida, de regular las relaciones laborales dentro de un proceso de integración regional. Originalmente adoptada en 1998, la declaración fue luego reformada y substancialmente mejorada en 2015. Este artículo explora cómo los organismos del Mercosur y, especialmente, los jueces nacionales a través de su activismo judicial han sorteado los obstáculos impuestos por la arquitectura institucional intergubernamental para utilizar a la Declaración Sociolaboral como un documento justiciable. Ello ha permitido que tanto los trabajadores como los ciudadanos en general puedan utilizarla para proteger sus derechos fundamentales en el marco de las relaciones laborales. Este artículo concluye que la revisión Declaración, que ya debería haber tenido lugar, debe reformar no sólo su naturaleza jurídica - a través del reconocimiento del mencionado instrumento como un protocolo adicional al Tratado de Asunción, sino que debe incluir nuevos derechos vinculados al trabajo de plataformas, y al cambio climático con especial énfasis en materia de empleo verde y políticas de transición justa.

Abstract: This paper’s objective is to examine the Judicature’s fulfillment of their duty to substantiate the court decisions in the criminal procedures and the link this obligation carries to the fundamental right of due process. For that, several Higher Courts rulings will be analyzed, with special emphasis regarding Constitutional Protections, and in a lesser way annulments due to article 373 letter a) of the Chilean Criminal Procedure Code. The result of this jurisprudential inquest has been the need to reinforce normatively the defendant’s due process guarantee to a duly substantiated court decision.

Resumen: El objetivo del presente trabajo es examinar el cumplimiento por parte de la judicatura del deber de fundamentar sus resoluciones en el proceso penal y el vínculo de esta obligación con la garantía fundamental del debido proceso. Para ello se analizarán diversos fallos de tribunales superiores de justicia, con especial énfasis respecto de acciones constitucionales de amparo y en menor medida algunas sentencias en sede de nulidad por la causal prescrita en el artículo 373 letra a) del código procesal penal. El resultado de esta indagación jurisprudencial ha sido la necesidad de reforzar normativamente la garantía del justiciable a que las resoluciones judiciales estén debidamente fundadas.

Resumen Este artículo presenta los resultados principales de una investigación sobre movilización de víctimas en la Argentina contemporánea. Es nuestro interés indagar sobre la legitimidad de la figura de las víctimas y familiares como principales portavoces de los reclamos de justicia que surgen de situaciones y casos de lo más diversos (violencia estatal, delitos, accidentes de tránsito, catástrofes, etc.). Las líneas de análisis están centradas en el trabajo específico que realizan las víctimas y familiares para producir un caso justiciable y judicial, en los procesos que dieron lugar a un devenir activista o generaron un compromiso político, y en la producción de la condición de víctima o victimización

Abstract This article presents the main results of our research on mobilization of victims in contemporary Argentina. It is our interest to inquire about the legitimacy of the figure of the victims and their families as the main spokespersons for the claims of justice that arise from situations and cases of great diversity (state violence, crimes, traffic accidents, catastrophes, etc.). The lines of analysis are centered on the specific work carried out by the victims and their families to produce a justiciable and judicial case; on the processes that gave rise to their becoming activists and/or generating a political commitment and on the production of the condition of victim or victimization.

Resumo Este artigo apresenta os principais resultados de uma pesquisa sobre a mobilização de vítimas na Argentina contemporânea. É nosso interesse analisar a legitimidade da figura das vítimas e de seus familiares como principais porta-vozes das demandas de justiça que surgem a partir de situações e casos dos mais diversos (violência estatal, crimes, acidentes de trânsito, catástrofes, etc.). As linhas de análise estão focadas no trabalho específico realizado pelas vítimas e seus familiares para produzir uma ação justiçável e judicial; nos processos que deram origem a se tornar ativista ou geraram um compromisso político, e na produção da condição de vítima ou vitimização.

Résumé Les travaux suivants suivent un cours normatif et de jurisprudence sur le droit au logement qui a eu lieu dans l’État plurinational de Bolivie depuis l’entrée en vigueur de la Constitution plurinationale de l’État de 2009 et de la Cour constitutionnelle plurinationale (TCP). La recherche vise à évaluer si les changements normatifs inclus dans la Constitution, considérés comme étant en même temps que la vision libérale et qui évaluent le droit au logement comme justifiable, ont eu une corrélation dans la pratique avec la prestation de la justice au plus fort de la magna carta. Pour ce faire, nous procéderons à une analyse de la jurisprudence au niveau quantitatif, du nombre total de décisions rendues par TCP et à l’approfondissement qualitatif des arguments des arrêts jugés emblématiques en termes de protection et de garantie du droit au logement. Les travaux seront accompagnés d’entretiens, d’un total de huit, menés sur les mouvements sociaux, les décideurs politiques et les personnes liées au PCC afin de donner une vue d’ensemble des progrès et des dettes en suspens dans la protection du droit au logement en Bolivie.

Abstract The following work takes a normative and jurisprudence course on the right to housing that has occurred in the Plurinational State of Bolivia since the entry into force of the Plurinational Constitution of the State of 2009 and the Plurinational Constitutional Court (TCP). The research aims to assess whether the normative changes included in the Constitution, considered to be at the same time as being at the same time as liberal vision and which assess the right to housing as justifiable, have had a correlation in practice with the delivery of justice at the height of magna carta. To do this, we will carry out an analysis of the case-law at the quantitative level, of the total number of decisions issued by TCP, and qualitative deepening the arguments of the judgments considered emblematic in terms of protection and guarantee of the right to housing. The work will be accompanied by interviews, a total of eight, conducted on social movements, political makers and people linked to TCP to give a comprehensive view on outstanding progress and debts in the protection of the right to housing Bolivia.

Resumen El trabajo que se presenta a continuación hace un recorrido normativo y jurisprudencial en materia del derecho a la vivienda de lo ocurrido en el Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia desde la entrada en vigor de la Constitución Plurinacional del Estado de 2009 y el Tribunal Constitucional Plurinacional (TCP). La investigación aspira a evaluar si los cambios normativos incluidos en la Constitución, considerados como contrapuestos con la visión liberal y que valoran como justiciable el derecho a la vivienda, han tenido una correlación en la práctica con la impartición de justicia a la altura de la carta magna. Para ello realizaremos un análisis de la jurisprudencia en el plano cuantitativo, del número total de decisiones emitidas por el TCP, y cualitativo al profundizar en las argumentaciones de las sentencias consideradas como emblemáticas en materia de protección y garantía del derecho a la vivienda.1 El trabajo irá acompañado de entrevistas, un total de ocho, realizadas a movimientos sociales, decisores políticos y personas vinculadas al TCP, para dar una visión integral sobre los avances y deudas pendientes en materia de protección al derecho a la vivienda en Bolivia.

Abstract This research focuses on the study of the use of AI in pretrial detention decision making. Specifically, it analyzes the way in which judges usually assess the requirements of pre-trial detention and questions whether AI systems can replicate such assessment processes, improving the efficiency of decision making. To this end, we analyze the biases that judges incur when deciding on pre-trial detention, assessing the purposes and dangers that justify it, and how AI tools could replicate and, when possible, improve such decisions. Finally, the paper reflects on the risks that the introduction of AI systems could pose to procedural rights and guarantees, trying to establish the precise precautions or safeguards that should flank the advance of AI in criminal justice to achieve an incorporation of science in justice that is respectful of the fundamental rights of the defendant. In short, this paper hinges on two key questions to be answered: 1st) Can the use of AI serve to improve the efficiency of the decision-making process regarding the adoption of pre-trial detention? 2nd) What risks does the use of AI in this context pose to the rights and guarantees of the defendant and what precautions should be taken to prevent such risks?

Resumen Esta investigación se centra en el estudio del uso de la IA en la toma de decisiones cautelares. Concretamente se examina la forma en que habitualmente los jueces valoran los presupuestos de la prisión provisional y se cuestiona si los sistemas de IA pueden replicar tales procesos valorativos, mejorando su eficacia. A tal fin, se analizan los sesgos en que incurren los jueces a la hora de decidir sobre la prisión provisional, evaluando sus diferentes presupuestos de adopción, y el modo en que las herramientas de IA podrían replicar y, en su caso, mejorar tales decisiones. Por último, se reflexiona sobre los riesgos que la introducción de sistemas de IA podría suponer para los derechos y garantías procesales, tratando de establecer las cautelas o salvaguardas precisas que debieran de flanquear el avance de la IA en la justicia penal para lograr una incorporación de la ciencia en la justicia que resulte respetuosa con los derechos fundamentales del justiciable. En definitiva, este trabajo pivota sobre dos cuestionamientos clave a los que se trata de dar respuesta: 1º) ¿El uso de la IA puede servir para mejorar la eficacia del proceso de toma decisión en cuanto a la adopción de la prisión provisional?; 2º) ¿Qué riesgos plantea el uso de la IA en este contexto para los derechos y garantías del justiciable y qué cautelas deben de adoptarse para prevenir tales riesgos?

The right to health care under article 12 of ICESCR is an instrumental right because it bears vital linkages to the realisation of other rights. For the many Nigerians living in poverty, their health may be the only asset on which they can rely for the exercise of other rights, such as the right to work or the right to adequate housing. Conversely, ill-health can be a liability to the many people living in poverty in Nigeria, even more so in the absence of equal access to affordable and essential healthcare services. This article aims to review the implication of article 12 of ICESCR on some of the existing initiatives for achieving the right to health care in Nigeria, especially in respect of human rights law and policy. The article argues that for Nigeria to meet its international obligations under the right to health care, it must commit to adequate funding of healthcare services and engage with regional and international partners to ensure compliance with article 12 of ICESCR. Given that the right to health care presently is not justiciable in Nigeria because of the ouster clause contained in section 6(6)(c) of the Nigerian Constitution, the article calls for an attitudinal change in the judicial perception of economic and social rights that come before the courts. It urges Nigerian courts to adopt the principle of the interdependency and indivisibility of rights, whereby judicial measures to enforce the right are given effect through the formally-enforceable civil and political rights contained in chapter four of the Nigerian Constitution. The Indian Supreme Court is reputable for taking this approach to the interpretation and enforcement of economic and social rights because the enjoyment of civil and political rights is linked to the satisfaction of economic and social rights, such as the right to health care. Finally, because of the importance of health care to a life of dignity, the article calls for Nigerian courts to adopt a progressive and broader approach when dealing with economic and social rights because of the evident connection between, for example, the right to health care and the right to life.

Resumen: El presente trabajo tiene como objetivo analizar la incorporación de la herramienta iSupport para mejorar el acceso justicia en los casos iusprivatistas que versen sobre obligaciones alimentarias transfronterizas y el apoyo que significa a las actividades que realizan las autoridades centrales de cada jurisdicción. Este mecanismo creado bajo el Reglamento de la Unión Europea sobre obligaciones alimentarias de 2009 y la Conferencia de La Haya en el Convenio sobre cobro Internacional de Alimentos para Niños y otros miembros de la Familia del 2007, pretende lograr mayor celeridad y disminución de costos en las tramitaciones de cobros internacionales de alimentos, por lo que se examinarán las ventajas y desventajas de este mecanismo y la capacidad de adaptación del Derecho internacional privado frente a los avances tecnológicos.

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to analyze the incorporation of the iSupport tool to improve access to justice in justiciable cases involving cross-border maintenance obligations and the contribution it makes to the activities carried out by the central authorities of each jurisdiction. This mechanism, created under the European Union Regulation on maintenance obligations of 2009 and the Hague Conference on International Recovery of Child Support and Other Forms of Family Maintenance of 2007, aims to achieve greater celerity and lower costs in the processing of international maintenance claims. The advantages and disadvantages of this mechanism and the capacity of private international law to adapt to technological advances will be therefore examined.

Resumen Este ensayo postula que la noción de dignidad humana formulada filosófica y moralmente desde la civilización occidental moderna, demanda hoy una re-lectura de sentido, a la luz de las perplejidades que anidan en la disonancia entre los principios morales y el derecho legal justiciable de los Derechos Humanos en las democracias contemporáneas. Si bien, la noción de Derechos Humanos deriva de la pertenencia a la familia humana en la que se asienta idealmente la universalidad de sus titulares y por el principio de autonomía, el resultado de esta mixtura tiene su traducción en dos concepciones problemáticas: una abstracta del ser humano sobre la que se instrumenta una supuesta universalidad que derivó en otra individualista que convierte a los hombres en sujetos aislados y egoístas. Identificar el núcleo de esta perplejidad en Platón, Aristóteles y Benhabib, constituye el propósito de esta reflexión.

Abstract This essay postulates that the notion of human dignity formulated philosophically and morally in modern Western civilization now demands a re-interpretation of meaning in light of the perplexities that lie in the dissonance between moral principles and the triable legal right of Human Rights in contemporary democracies. Although the notion of Human Rights derives from belonging to the human family in which the universality of its holders is ideally based and on the basis of the principle of autonomy, the result of this mixture translates into two problematic conceptions: an abstract one concerning the human being, in which an alleged universality is orchestrated that led to another individualistic one that turns men into selfish, isolated subjects. Identifying the core of this perplexity in Plato, Aristotle and Benhabib is the purpose of this reflection.

Resumen El presente artículo tiene como objetivo demostrar que en virtud de la hermenéutica de los artículos 26 y 29 literales b) y d) de la Convención Americana sobre Derechos Humanos y el Caso Lagos del Campo vs. Perú -que serán materia de análisis en el presente artículo académico- es justiciable el derecho a la estabilidad laboral y a la libertad de expresión en contextos laborales en sede supranacional, es decir, ante la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. En primer lugar, se explicará el origen del debate referido a la justiciabilidad directa de los derechos económicos, sociales, culturales y ambientales. Posteriormente, los primeros pronunciamientos -incluido el más determinante de la Corte- para, finalmente, argumentar que los Estados parte de la Convención Americana se encuentran sujetos a fortalecer los estados tuitivos de los derechos laborables.

Abstract This article intends to prove that, pursuant to the hermeneutics of Articles 26 and 29 (b) and (d) of the American Convention on Human Rights and the case Lagos del Campo vs. Peru -which is analyzed herein-, the rights to job security and freedom of expression in labor contexts are justiciable at a supranational venue, that is, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. First, the origin of the debate about direct justiciability of economic, social, cultural and environmental rights is explained. Then, the first rulings of the Court -including the most decisive one- in order to, finally, argue that State parties to the American Convention are subject to strengthening the protection of labor rights.

Resumo Este artigo tem como objetivo demonstrar que, devido à hermenêutica dos artigos 26 e 29 alíneas b) e d) da Convenção Americana de Direitos Humanos e ao Caso Lagos del Campo vs. Peru - que serão matéria de análise neste artigo -, é litigável o direito à estabilidade no emprego e à liberdade de expressão em ambientes de trabalho em sede supranacional, isto é, ante a Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos. Em primeiro lugar, será explicada a origem do debate referente à justiciabilidade direta dos Direitos Econômicos, Sociais, Culturais e Ambientais. Em seguida, os primeiros pronunciamentos - incluído o mais determinante da Corte - para, finalmente, argumentar que os Estados-parte da Convenção Americana se encontram sujeitos a fortalecer o estado protetor dos direitos trabalhistas.

The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child ("CRC") is the leading international instrument recognising the human rights of children across all areas of their lives. Amid measures of legal incorporation, giving constitutional expression to children's rights represents a high watermark of legal protection. South Africa was an early mover in this space adopting a strong children's rights provision in the 1996 South Africa Constitution which made children's rights justiciable as part of a Bill of Rights. Over the last two decades, an empowered judiciary and an active community of legal advocates have combined to enable the South African Constitutional Court to create a body of case-law that has provided leadership globally in the recognition and enforcement of the constitutional rights of children. Against the backdrop of the Convention's 30th anniversary and increased emphasis on the legal implementation of children's rights, this article reflects on the South African experience of using its Constitution to advance children's rights. Using South Africa as a case study, it considers how the potential associated with giving children's rights the highest status in a country's legal system can be maximised. It identifies the lessons to be learned from the South African experience before concluding with a reminder that however dynamic the development of children's rights law, the effectiveness of the CRC's implementation can only ever be measured by the extent to which it improves children's enjoyment of their rights.

Abstract: This essay analyzes article 353 of Civil Procedures of Jalisco, which foresees specific regulations on wages of official experts that participate in trials. The fees of official experts that support judges are only paid by the party who proposed the proof. It is considered that this regulation infringes constitutional rights. Thus, it is proposed to implement a judicial review ex officio by judges in order to avoid the application of this article. Finally, an epilog calls for grating gratuity to poor people when participating in civil trials.

Resumen: Este ensayo analiza el artículo 353 del Código de Procedimientos Civiles del Estado de Jalisco, que regula el pago de honorarios del perito oficial. Ese precepto dispone que los honorarios del perito que auxilia al órgano jurisdiccional únicamente son pagados por el justiciable que ofreció la prueba. Se sostiene que tal regulación es violatoria de derechos fundamentales y, en consecuencia, se proponen los pasos a seguir para realizar un ejercicio de control difuso sobre tal norma, lo cual conduce a su inaplicación en casos concretos. Como colofón, se hace un llamado hacia la gratuidad en esta clase de pruebas para personas en situación de pobreza, a fin de garantizar de mejor manera su derecho de acceso a la justicia.

Resumen: El presente artículo tiene como objetivo analizar las causas y antecedentes que han contribuido a que, en Argentina, la designación del Defensor del Niño se haya judicializado. En el fallo caratulado “Fundación Sur Argentina y otros c/en Honorable Cámara de Senadores de la Nación y otro s/Amparo ley 16.986”, (expediente N° 15581/2015), publicado el 9 de marzo de 2017, el Juzgado Nacional de Primera Instancia en lo Contencioso Administrativo Federal Número 3, exhortó al Congreso de la Nación, debido a su dilación, a designar un Defensor del Niño para dar cumplimiento a lo establecido en la ley 26.061.

Abstract: The objective of this article is to analyze the causes and precedents that have contributed to the fact that, in Argentina, the designation of the Ombudsman for Children has been judicialized. In the ruling entitled "South Argentina Foundation and others c / Honorable Chamber of Senators of the Nation and other s / Amparo Law 16.986", published on March 9, 2017, the National Court of First Instance in the Federal Administrative Contentious Number 3, exhorted the Congress of the Nation, due to its delay, to appoint an Ombudsman to comply with the provisions of law 26.061.