La question centrale était la suivante: comment et quelles coalitions de défense ont influencé la politique dans la période étudiée et quelles étaient les croyances et les valeurs qui délimitaient ces coalitions? Le travail a dialogué avec le modèle de coalition de défense. La caractérisation des coalitions a été définie à partir de trois convictions centrales de la politique: centraliser ou décentraliser les décisions sur les concessions et la gestion budgétaire des ressources issues de l’activité maritime commerciale; l’exploitation des services liés au secteur par les pouvoirs publics ou l’initiative privée; ouverture ou non de la participation au capital étranger dans l’exploration portuaire et de navigation (Campos de Oliveira, You et Coelho, 2021). Dans l’ordre, trois moments ont été déterminés pour mener une étude comparative diachronique: la dictature civilo-militaire (1964/85), la référence pour la comparaison avec d’autres périodes; le processus constituant de 1987/88 (T1); et la loi de modernisation portuaire (T2). En fin de compte, les travaux ont identifié la National Corporate Industrial Coalition comme dominant dans le sous-système politique. Il a été possible d’identifier un plus grand conflit dans la tentative de réforme menée en 1993, sans le potentiel, cependant, de générer des changements significatifs dans la politique. suivante lactivité l activité commerciale lexploitation exploitation linitiative initiative privée lexploration exploration Campos Oliveira Coelho 2021. 2021 . 2021) lordre, lordre ordre, ordre l’ordre diachronique civilomilitaire civilo militaire 1964/85, 196485 1964/85 , 1964 85 (1964/85) dautres d autres périodes 198788 1987 88 1987/8 T1 T (T1) T2. T2 (T2) compte soussystème sous système didentifier identifier 1993 potentiel cependant 202 19648 1964/8 196 8 (1964/85 19878 198 1987/ (T1 (T2 199 20 1964/ 19 (1964/8 (T 2 1 (1964/ (1964 (196 (19 (1 (
The central question was the following: how and which defense coalitions influenced the Policy in the period studied and what were the beliefs and values that delineated these coalitions? The work dialogued with the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF). The characterization of the coalitions was defined based on three policy core beliefs: centralize or decentralize decisions on concessions and budgetary management of resources arising from commercial maritime activity; exploitation of services linked to the sector by public authorities or private initiative; opening or not of foreign capital participation in port and navigation exploration (Campos de Oliveira, You and Coelho, 2021). In sequence, three moments were determined to carry out a diachronic comparative study: the civil-military dictatorship (1964/85), the reference for comparison with other periods; the constituent process of 1987/88 (T1); and the Port Modernization Law (T2). In the end, the work identified the National Corporate Industrial Coalition as dominant in the policy subsystem. It was possible to identify greater conflict in the reform attempt carried out in 1993, without the potential, however, to generate significant changes in the policy. following ACF. ACF . (ACF) activity initiative Campos Oliveira Coelho 2021. 2021 2021) sequence study civilmilitary civil military 1964/85, 196485 1964/85 , 1964 85 (1964/85) periods 198788 1987 88 1987/8 T1 T (T1) T2. T2 (T2) end subsystem 1993 potential however (ACF 202 19648 1964/8 196 8 (1964/85 19878 198 1987/ (T1 (T2 199 20 1964/ 19 (1964/8 (T 2 1 (1964/ (1964 (196 (19 (1 (
A questão central foi a seguinte: como e quais coalizões de defesa incidiram sobre a Política no período estudado e quais foram as crenças e os valores delineadores dessas coalizões? O trabalho dialogou com o Modelo de Coalizão de Defesa. Definiu-se o quadro de caracterização das coalizões a partir de três crenças centrais da política: centralizar ou descentralizar as decisões sobre concessões e gestão orçamentária dos recursos oriundos da atividade marítima mercantil; exploração dos serviços vinculados ao setor pelo poder público ou pela iniciativa privada; abertura ou não da participação de capital estrangeiro na exploração portuária e de navegação (Campos de Oliveira, You e Coelho, 2021). Em sequência, determinou-se três momentos para realizar um estudo comparado diacrônico: a ditadura civil-militar (1964/85), a referência para comparação aos demais períodos; o processo constituinte de 1987/88 (T1); e a Lei de Modernização dos Portos (T2). Ao final, o trabalho identificou a Coalizão Industrial Nacional Corporativa como dominante no subsistema da política. Foi possível identificar maior conflito na tentativa de reforma realizada em 1993, sem potencial, entretanto, para gerar mudanças significativas na política. seguinte Defesa Definiuse Definiu se política mercantil privada Campos Oliveira Coelho 2021. 2021 . 2021) sequência determinouse determinou diacrônico civilmilitar civil militar 1964/85, 196485 1964/85 , 1964 85 (1964/85) períodos 198788 1987 88 1987/8 T1 T (T1) T2. T2 (T2) final 1993 potencial entretanto 202 19648 1964/8 196 8 (1964/85 19878 198 1987/ (T1 (T2 199 20 1964/ 19 (1964/8 (T 2 1 (1964/ (1964 (196 (19 (1 (