Resumen Objetivo: Conocer las necesidades formativas y de recursos de los tutores de formación especializada de farmacia hospitalaria de España, así como su motivación y satisfacción con la docencia. Método: Se realizó, mediante Google-forms®, una encuesta dirigida a tutores de farmacia hospitalaria durante enero-marzo de 2019 con preguntas generales (tutor, hospital, servicio) y específicas (medios disponibles, actividades docentes, satisfacción con la docencia, necesidades formativas). Se realizó un análisis exploratorio univariante para estudiar posibles factores relacionados con la satisfacción y la motivación docente. Resultados: Respondieron 83 tutores (tasa de respuesta: 52,8%), de 15/17 comunidades autónomas. El número de residentes/año-tutor resultó 4 (rango intercuartílico = 2-4). El 96,4% realizan entrevistas (trimestrales [65,1%]-ninguna [3,6%]. También se ocupan principalmente de la gestión de rotaciones externas [97,6%], planificación de rotaciones [97,6%] y la evaluación anual [96,4%]). El 17,1% dispone de horas para la docencia insuficientes para el 71,4%. Un 70,7% de los tutores de ocho comunidades autónomas con normativa sobre el tiempo de liberación carecen de dicho tiempo. Los tutores se declararon mayoritariamente satisfechos con la docencia (66,7%) y motivados (63,0%). Parece que la motivación desciende con la edad, y que motivación y satisfacción disminuyen con los años como tutor y como especialista, también son menores en ausencia de liberación o retribución económica, sin haberse podido demostrar asociación. Los tutores seleccionaron como acciones de mejora: aumento de dedicación horaria (78%), planes formativos validados por la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria (76,8%), mejorar técnicas pedagógicas (65,9%) y menor carga asistencial (62,2%). En los últimos 3 años el 69,1% recibió formación. La formación fue organizada por la Comisión de Docencia (63,3%), comunidades autónomas (42,4%) y Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria (13,6%). La formación propuesta en competencias clínicas, docentes y de comunicación fue ampliamente aceptada (> 90%). El formato docente preferido fue semipresencial (64,6%). Conclusiones: El Grupo de Tutores de la Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria ha realizado la primera encuesta nacional dirigida a tutores de farmacia hospitalaria. La encuesta muestra que, aunque la satisfacción con la actividad docente es elevada, los tutores demandan más tiempo de dedicación y una mayor formación. Además, pone de manifiesto que es preciso desarrollar el marco normativo en varias comunidades autónomas y mejorar el cumplimiento de la normativa autonómica vigente.
Abstract Objective: To provide new insight into the training needs and resources required by hospital pharmacy resident tutors in Spain, as well as into their level of motivation and satisfaction with their teaching. Method: Google Forms® was used to design a survey addressed to hospital pharmacy resident tutors between January and March 2019. They survey consisted of generic (tutor, hospital, service) and specific questions (available resources, teaching activities, teaching satisfaction, training needs). A univariate exploratory analysis was conducted to study possible factors related to teaching satisfaction and motivation. Results: Replies were received from 83 tutors (rate of response: 52.8%), from 15/17 Spanish regions. The annual resident/tutor ratio was 4 (IQR = 2-4). A total of 96.4% of tutors conducted interviews, of whom 65.1% did so quarterly. Other activities included the management of external training rotations (97.6%), planning of rotations (97.6%) and anual appraisals (96.4%). Only 17.1% of respondents were given time off their regular duties for their tutorship work, with 71.4% stating that the time they were allowed was insufficient. A total of 70.7% of tutors from eight Spanish regions where the granting of protected time was regulated said were not given any time off for their teaching endeavors. Most tutors declared to be satisfied (66.7%) and motivated (63%) with their teaching work. Motivation appeared to fall with age, and both motivation and satisfaction decreased as a function of the tutors’ years of professional experience and when they were given no time off for their tutorship work or when the remuneration was low, without any relationship being identified between these factors. Tutors pointed out that work should be done to increase the number of hours assigned to tutorships (78%), preparing SEFH-validated training plans (76.8%), improving teaching techniques (65.9%), and decreasing the clinical workload (62.2%). Over the past 3 years, 69.1% of tutors had received training. This training was arranged by educational committees (63.3%), the Spanish regional authorities (42.4%) and SEFH (13.6%). All the training in clinical, teaching, and communicative competencies enjoyed wide acceptance (> 90%). The preferred delivery method was hybrid (partly on-line and partly onsite) (64.6%). Conclusions: SEFH’s tutors’ group conducted its first national survey addressed to hospital pharmacy resident tutors. The survey showed that, although tutors are highly satisfied with their teaching activities, they would like more training and to be able to devote more time to their tutorship work. It was also shown that a regulatory framework needs to be implemented in various Spanish regions and that compliance with existing regional regulations must be improved.