ABSTRACT In Colombia, labour law seeks to prevent and punish harassment at work, understood as "persistent and demonstrable" conduct with the purpose of undermining the dignity of the worker. Likewise, criminal law criminalises sexual harassment, understood as the act of using one's superiority for non-consensual sexual purposes. This criminal offence seeks to protect freedom, integrity and sexual training. This article analyses, using a gender perspective, the fragmentation that has occurred so far as a result of this double regulation in scenarios of sexual harassment in the workplace and which the Congress of the Republic seeks to remedy with the issuing of Act 2365, 2024. We present six tensions or points in common between labour and criminal regulations. We conclude the article by proposing three lines of research: (1) on the barriers to access to justice for sexual harassment, (2) to continue feminist dogmatic research and (3) on the forms of control in labour settings.

RESUMEN En Colombia, el derecho laboral busca prevenir y sancionar el acoso laboral, entendido como una conducta "persistente y demostrable" con el propósito de cercenar la dignidad del trabajador. Asimismo, el derecho penal tipifica el acoso sexual, comprendido como el hecho de querer valerse de la superioridad con fines sexuales no consentidos. Este tipo penal busca proteger la libertad, la integridad y la formación sexual. Este artículo analiza, utilizando una perspectiva de género, la fragmentación que se ha presentado hasta ahora a raíz de esta doble regulación en escenarios de acoso sexual laboral y que el Congreso de la República busca subsanar con la expedición de la Ley 2365 de 2024. Presentamos seis tensiones o puntos en común entre las regulaciones laborales y penales. Concluimos el artículo proponiendo tres líneas de investigación: (1) sobre las barreras de acceso a la justicia del acoso sexual, (2) continuar la investigación dogmática feminista y (3) sobre las formas de control en escenarios laborales.

RESUMEN El objetivo de este artículo es plantear una política pública destinada a garantizar un uso adecuado de las medidas cautelares, las unidades de servicios previos al juicio. Estas estructuras administrativas, por un lado, potencian la aplicación de las salidas alternativas a la prisión preventiva, así como, por otro, se ocupan de que su aplicación no sea sinónimo de impunidad e inseguridad. Esta estrategia enfrenta dos problemas centrales de la justicia tradicional, la ausencia de un diagnóstico adecuado para escoger la opción cautelar más adecuada, datos del arraigo social, y el seguimiento al régimen impuesto. La ventaja práctica es que esta propuesta se fundamenta en una metodología probada en el contexto internacional, en el Ecuador y recomendada como una buena práctica por la Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. De hecho, en Latinoamérica las distintas experiencias cuyos resultados fueron medidos revelan que la aplicación de esta estrategia en diversos momentos alcanzó una efectividad sin precedentes para potenciar medidas sustitutivas y para conseguir la presentación de las personas al juicio. Inclusive, en un momento en el que la prensa y la ciudadanía ejercen presiones para aumentar el encarcelamiento provisional son una respuesta válida, pues el informe emitido transparenta las causas de la resolución judicial adoptada.

ABSTRACT The aim of this article is to propose a public policy intended to ensure an appropriate use of precautionary measures, pre-trial service units. These administrative structures, on the one hand, enhance the application of alternative exits from pretrial detention and, on the other, ensure that their implementation is not synonymous with impunity and insecurity. Specifically, this strategy addresses two central problems of traditional justice: the absence of an adequate diagnosis to choose the most suitable preventive option and the monitoring of the imposed regimen. It specifically focuses on providing verified information about social ties. The practical advantage is that this proposal is based on a methodology proven in the international context, in Ecuador, and recommended as a best practice by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. In fact, in Latin America, various experiences, whose results were measured, reveal that the application of this strategy at different times achieved an unprecedented effectiveness in enhancing substitute measures and ensuring the appearance of individuals at trial. Even at a time when the press and the public exert pressure to increase provisional incarceration, they are a valid response, as the issued report transparently elucidates the reasons behind the adopted judicial resolution.

Abstract The objective of this paper is to propose a sentencing model with a gender perspective for judges, which contributes to guaranteeing the application of women’s human rights and reducing errors in sentences, such as: revictimization, poor access to justice, discrimination, as well as gender stereotypes or prejudices that can affect judicial reasoning. The methodological design of this study is based on the qualitative paradigm based on the data collection technique and a descriptive legal content analysis of specialized guidelines in the doctrinal and normative field, as well as thirty sentences for gender-based crimes in the period 2020-2023 issued by the Judicial Branch of the State of Michoacán. As a result, a guide or model of sentencing in criminal matters is proposed so that judges can identify and apply it in cases where gender violence has been proven, this will make it possible to have a more precise and solid judgment in its argumentation, as well as to meet the main criteria for the protection of women’s human rights before the corpus iuris of law on the matter.

Resumen El presente trabajo tiene como objetivo proponer un modelo de sentencia con perspectiva de género para personas juzgadoras, que contribuya a garantizar la aplicación de los derechos humanos de las mujeres y disminuir errores en las sentencias, tales como: la revictimización, el poco acceso a la justicia, la discriminación, así como los estereotipos o prejuicios de género que pueden afectar el razonamiento judicial. El diseño metodológico de este estudio parte del paradigma cualitativo basado en la técnica de recolección de datos y de un análisis jurídico de contenido de corte descriptivo de lineamientos especializados del ámbito doctrinal y normativo, así como de treinta sentencias de delitos por razón de género en el periodo 2020-2023 emitidas por el Poder Judicial del Estado de Michoacán. Como resultado se propone una guía o modelo de sentencia en materia penal para que las personas juzgadoras puedan identificar y aplicarlo en casos en donde se haya comprobado la violencia de género, lo que permitirá tener una sentencia más precisa y sólida en su argumentación, así como cumplir los principales criterios de protección de los derechos humanos de las mujeres ante el corpus iuris de derecho en la materia.

The utilisation of online platform Blackboard Learn for Teaching and Learning (T & L) has become an essential and obligatory component of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). This study research aims to examine the difficulties and potential of its implementation at a Historically Disadvantaged Institution (HDI) like University of Limpopo (UL), with a focus on the Bachelor of Arts (BA) programme in Criminology and Psychology (Crim & Psych) as guided by University of Limpopo Faculty of Humanities Multimodal Teaching and Learning Plan (UL FHMTLP). This qualitative study employed an empirical research design, selecting Twelve (12) permanent Academics/Lecturers from the Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice at UL for interview purposes. The verbatim responses from the interviews were analysed to identify the key themes and sub-themes of the study using the inductive Thematic Content Analysis (TCA) method. This study revealed that there is a lack of utilisation of Blackboard Learn at UL, as well as ineffective adaptation of current strategies and UL FHMTLP implementations. Many Lecturers still depend on contact T & L and the use of Blackboard Learn to connect the operations of this programme is currently unsuccessful. Recommendations consist of regular training and refreshment courses on the application of this technology, such as the Learning Management System (LMS) provided by the Information and Communications Technology [ICT]-electronic-(e)-Learning Unit. This could potentially facilitate collaborations between Natural Sciences (Technology - Blackboard Learn) and Human Sciences (Crim & Psych) to generate new knowledge, while also clearly providing the advantages of technology utilisation for T & L at UL. This kind of innovation could accommodate "economical, educational, technical, and social transformations" to address the mentioned challenges and opportunities, while making contributions to the field of professorship, with a focus on the South African Future Professors Programme (FPP) Phase 2 Cohort 1 2022-2023, utilising Blackboard Learn for T & L in a HDI to outline the existing challenges and possibilities.

Studies offering curriculum framework for institutional internalisation of criminology and forensics studies and Work-Integrated Learning (WIL) within the Criminal Justice System (CJS) are scarce. This article gives a scoping review of these concepts, which are currently presented separately, as they are from distant study fields. As a result, the objective of this article is to establish the current link between criminology and forensic studies to enhance the South African CJS and Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) curriculum frameworks, while integrating theory and practice. This qualitative scoping review was supported by the adapted version of methodology framework by Arksey, Hilary and O'Malley, Lisa of 2005 to search for approximately 9 031 relevant studies from fundamental databases and 139 000 internet sources focusing on South African context and other international countries. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was used for data analysis, coupled with the inductive Thematic Content Analysis (TCA). This article confirmed that combining forensic criminology features could transform the South African CJS and HEIs offerings. For recommendations, the Qualifications Board should expedite the registration of forensic criminology as a profession consisting of professional qualification, guided by ethical and disciplinary rules. Overall, limited prioritisations, slow registration process to a "Scientific Board" and advancement of this discipline negatively affect immediate responses to achieve the WIL. The knowledge, attitudes, skills and values gained during participating in the South African Future Professors Programme (FPP) Phase 2 Cohort 1 2022-2023 offered contributions to the field of professorship thereof.

El presente trabajo pretende investigar las interacciones entre policías y Outsiders en flagrantes de drogas y las negociaciones de mercancía política, su evolución y enmascaramientos, destacando cómo tales dinámicas moldean la aplicación de la ley y las percepciones de justicia en la ciudad de Río de Janeiro. Además de que la etiquetación de los individuos vistos como externos es una construcción política, el trabajo también profundiza en el concepto de “sujeción criminal”, que abarca tanto los procesos de criminalización preventiva de los tipos sociales potencialmente criminales como los de subjetivación de las etiquetas que se les asignan (Grillo, 2008, p. 146), es decir, la creación de clasificaciones subjetivas de quién es “bandido” y quién no lo es. Así se moldean los conflictos urbanos y las diferentes abordajes según los marcadores sociales de los individuos y los lugares de flagrante, exponiendo las manifestaciones de violencia urbana y sociabilidad violenta, incluso en el Sistema de Justicia con el fundamento de la subjetividad de la Ley de Drogas.

This paper aims to investigate the interactions between police officers and outsiders in drug trafficking and political commodity negotiations, their evolution, and masking, highlighting how such dynamics shape law enforcement and perceptions of justice in Rio de Janeiro. In addition to the labeling of individuals seen as Outsiders being a political construction, the paper also delves into the concept of “criminal subjection”, which encompasses both the processes of preventive criminalization of potentially criminal social types and the subjectivization of the labels attributed to them (Grillo, 2008, p. 146), causing subjective classifications of who is a “bandido” and who is not. Thus, urban conflicts and different approaches are shaped according to the social markers of individuals and locations of the act, exposing the manifestations of urban violence and violent sociability.

O presente trabalho pretende investigar as interações entre policiais e outsiders em flagrantes de drogas e as negociações de mercadoria política, sua evolução e mascaramentos, destacando como tais dinâmicas moldam as aplicações da lei e as percepções de justiça na cidade do Rio de Janeiro. Além da rotulação nos indivíduos vistos como Outsiders ser uma construção política, o trabalho também se aprofunda no conceito de “sujeição criminal”, que abrange tanto os processos de criminalização preventivo dos tipos sociais potencialmente criminosos, quanto os de subjetivação dos rótulos que lhe são atribuídos (Grillo, 2008, p. 146), isto é, fazendo que classificações subjetivas de quem é “bandido” e quem não é, nasçam. Moldando assim os conflitos urbanos e abordagens diferentes de acordo com os marcadores sociais de indivíduos e locais de flagrante, expondo as manifestações de violência urbana e sociabilidade violenta, inclusive no Sistema de Justiça com o alicerce da subjetividade da Lei de Drogas.

Abstract Research and literature on the juvenile criminal justice system in Brazil has focused on the specific legal aspects and rights guarantees of the procedures related to the apprehension of adolescents in flagrante delicto, without highlighting the issues related to the obstacles to the investigation of violence committed at the time of apprehension. As for the criminal justice system, the creation and disputes related to pre-trial hearings have shed light on the first moments immediately after the arrest of adults in flagrante delicto and the importance of structuring a state support network for the collection and recording of any violence committed at the time of arrest. In this article, we seek to understand to what extent the difference between the two procedures creates a dichotomy between mechanisms for determining violence, what are possible reasons for resistance to incorporating pre-trial hearings into the juvenile justice system, and what are the possible ways to deepen the debate on police violence and the presentation to authorities of the justice systems. pretrial pre trial article systems

Resumo As pesquisas e produções bibliográficas sobre o sistema de justiça juvenil criminal no Brasil têm se debruçado aos aspectos jurídicos e garantias de direitos específicos dos procedimentos relacionados à apreensão de adolescentes em flagrante, sem darem destaque às questões ligadas aos entraves para apuração de violências cometidas no momento das apreensões. Já em relação ao sistema de justiça criminal, a criação e as disputas relacionadas às audiências de custódia têm lançado luz aos primeiros momentos imediatamente após a prisão em flagrante de adultos e a importância da estruturação de uma rede de apoio do Estado para a coleta e o registro de eventuais violências cometidas no momento da prisão. Neste artigo, busca-se compreender em que medida a diferença entre os dois procedimentos cria uma dicotomia entre mecanismos de apuração de violências, quais seriam possíveis motivos para a resistência da incorporação das audiências de custódia para o sistema de justiça juvenil, e quais os caminhos possíveis para aprofundar o debate sobre violência policial e a apresentação a autoridades dos sistemas de justiças. apreensões artigo buscase busca justiças

Abstract The objective of the article is to present a discussion about the methodological difficulties faced in carrying out research on the identification of criminal suspects in Brazil - a practice known as “founded suspicion”, provided for in art. 244 of the Criminal Procedure Code - especially studies aimed at understanding such identification as racially discriminatory. Comparing how this debate emerged in the United States, we question the reasons why this topic faced impasses in forming a research agenda in the country, in addition to pointing out the strategies used by Brazilian researchers to address such issues. Aiming to overcome these shortcomings, in the article we propose new possibilities for using methodologies to carry out these studies, deepening the analysis of how other actors in the criminal justice system - in addition to the police - also reproduce a discriminatory standard narrative about these cases. founded suspicion, suspicion , suspicion” art 24 States country issues shortcomings cases 2

Resumo O objetivo do artigo é apresentar uma discussão sobre as dificuldades metodológicas enfrentadas para se realizar pesquisas sobre a identificação de suspeitos criminais no Brasil - prática conhecida como “fundada suspeita”, prevista no art. 244 do CPP - em especial aquelas voltadas a compreendê-la como racialmente discriminatória. Fazendo uma comparação em como esse debate surgiu nos Estados Unidos, questionamos os motivos pelos quais esse tema enfrentou impasses para formar uma agenda de pesquisa no país, além de apontar as estratégias utilizadas por pesquisadores brasileiros para abordar tais assuntos. Visando superar esses impasses, propomos no artigo novas possibilidades de utilização de metodologias para realização das pesquisas, voltadas a aprofundar a análise sobre como outros atores do sistema de justiça criminal - além da polícia - também reproduzem uma narrativa-padrão e discriminatória sobre esses casos. fundada suspeita, suspeita , suspeita” art 24 compreendêla compreendê la Unidos país assuntos narrativapadrão narrativa padrão casos 2

Abstract The article is the result of an ethnographic research developed with the Arhuaco indigenous people of the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta in Colombia, between 2017 and 2020, from my participation as an expert witness before the Supreme Court of Justice (highest instance of criminal and penal matters in the country), in the process of seeking justice for the detention, torture and murder of three indigenous authorities in 1990. In the article I analyze the complex process of the Arhuaco people to confront this act of violence, by undertaking a socio-legal mobilization that invoked the presence of the Colombian state with the prosecution of what happened to the three authorities. Colombia 201 2020 highest country, country , country) detention 1990 violence sociolegal socio legal 20 202 199 2 19 1

Resumen El artículo es resultado de una investigación etnográfica desarrollada con el pueblo indígena arhuaco de la Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta en Colombia, entre 2017 y 2020, a partir de mi participación como perita ante la Corte Suprema de Justicia (máxima instancia de los asuntos penales y criminales en el país), en el proceso de búsqueda de justicia por la detención, tortura y asesinato de tres autoridades indígenas en 1990. Sobre la base de esta experiencia pretendo analizar en el artículo el complejo recorrido del pueblo arhuaco para enfrentar este hecho de violencia, al emprender una movilización sociolegal que invocó la presencia del estado colombiano con la judicialización de lo ocurrido a las tres autoridades. Colombia 201 2020 máxima país, país , país) detención 1990 violencia 20 202 199 2 19 1

Abstract This investigation uses the method of decision analysis to analyze the positioning of the Sergipe Court of Justice, between 2020 and 2022, about the refusal of companies that offer transportation service via app to effect or cancel to remain in their registry with drivers who respond to criminal proceedings without final and unappealable decisions. The analysis of the decisions is based on some strategic theoretical frameworks, as based on the concepts of sacrificial citizenship and the economization of law, neoliberalism as a rationality and a deep process, and capitalism as surveillance. As a result, it was identified that the TJSE prioritized the contractual autonomy, the freedom to guide objective safety criteria, the misalignment of drivers with the Term and Conditions for use over the principles of the presumption of innocence and the social function of the contract. To problematize this scenario, the article also questions about the (un)protection of workers' personal data by app, the lack of transparency in the use of new technologies to collect data regarding ongoing criminal cases as a way to reiterate old social or labor exclusions. Finally, it concludes on the approximation of the grounds handled by the Sergipe Court of Justice with the new economic demands of neoliberal management, such as the reduction of the constitutional pact in favor of corporate autonomy, both on the disposability of subjects and on the irregular capture of their personal data. 202 2022 frameworks law process surveillance result autonomy criteria contract scenario unprotection un protection workers exclusions Finally management 20 2

Resumo Esta investigação utiliza o método de análises de decisões para examinar o posicionamento do Tribunal de Justiça de Sergipe, entre 2020 e 2022, sobre a recusa das empresas que oferecem o serviço de transporte via aplicativo de efetivar ou de permanecer em seu cadastro com motoristas que respondem a processos criminais sem decisões transitadas em julgado. A análise das decisões parte de alguns marcos teóricos estratégicos, como o conceito de cidadania sacrificial e da economicização do direito, do neoliberalismo enquanto uma racionalidade e um processo profundo, do capitalismo como vigilância. Como resultado, identificou-se que o TJSE priorizou a autonomia contratual, a liberdade para pautar critérios objetivos de segurança, o desalinhamento dos motoristas com o Termo e as Condições para uso em detrimento dos princípios da presunção de inocência e da função social do contrato. Para problematizar este cenário o artigo ainda questiona sobre a (des)proteção dos dados pessoais dos trabalhadores por aplicativo, a falta de transparência na utilização de novas tecnologias para coletar dados referentes a processos criminais em andamento como forma de reiterar velhas exclusões sociais ou laborais. Por fim, conclui-se sobre a aproximação dos fundamentos manejados pelo Tribunal de Justiça de Sergipe com as novas exigências econômicas da gestão neoliberal, tal como a redução do pacto constitucional em benefício da autonomia empresarial, tanto sobre a descartabilidade dos sujeitos, como sobre a captação irregular de seus dados pessoais. 202 2022 julgado estratégicos direito profundo vigilância resultado identificouse identificou se contratual segurança contrato desproteção des proteção laborais fim concluise conclui neoliberal empresarial sujeitos 20 2

Abstract Introduction/Frame: Trust is foundational to qualitative research and program evaluation to ensure that data collection, data analysis, and actionable recommendations improve programs and produce effective outcomes. Concomitantly, building trust between the university and community sectors offers a rich opportunity to join efforts to address public health issues including substance use, homelessness, criminal justice involvement, and mental illness. Research suggests cross-sector collaboration among human services organizations produces effective outcomes when stakeholders are engaged, trust one another, and have shared goals. Developing qualitative program evaluation partnerships between university researchers and human service organizations offers a valuable application of cross-sector collaboration, including the transferability of qualitative research and program evaluation findings. Objective: This conceptual paper aims to highlight the essentiality of trust, summarize the facilitators and barriers of collaboration, and share a case example of a partnership. Additionally, it offers implications for researchers and community partners while outlining the benefits of university/community collaboration. Finally, we will offer a conceptual model of the iterative relationship between trustworthiness, trust, and impact in our evaluation approach. Theoretical Framework: Our approach to community-focused qualitative program evaluation is anchored in an action research paradigm, a use evaluation approach, coupled with trust as the key factor in developing and maintaining effective evaluative relationships. The Impact of Trust: Three areas in which trust is most beneficial to qualitative program evaluation are relationships, data collection, and transferability of results. Conceptual Model: Our model is grounded in three seminal works focusing on trust in business-business relationships, organizational trustworthiness as a mediator to both cognitive and affective trust, and relationship stability in inter-organizational reliance. Final Considerations: We found that using this model allowed quicker research-to-practice implementation of evaluation recommendations, solidified community/university collaborative relationships, and facilitated strategies to address workforce shortages in community human services agencies.

Abstract Introduction/Frame: Treatment courts (TCs) were developed in the 1980s to address challenges facing individuals with a substance use disorder (SUD) involved in the criminal justice (CJ) system. TCs are an alternative to the punitive nature of the CJ system by joining SUD treatment with the accountability of the judicial system. By design, treatment court (TC) implementations are highly varied. Each implementation adopts the National Association of Drug Court Professionals (NADCP) key components that are consistent with yet bound by their community resources, values, and political realities. Research Questions/Objective: Using qualitative community-based participatory research, two case studies and one phenomenological study were conducted with treatment courts in a mid-Atlantic state in the USA to examine successful TC operations. Methodology: Using purposive sampling, the analytic plan included individual semi-structured interviews with judges, TC team members, program graduates, and community stakeholders. Interviews were professionally transcribed and coded consistent with thematic analysis procedures. Results: Analysis revealed themes of judicial sovereignty juxtaposed with a lack of knowledge of SUDs, the importance of a fully dedicated coordinator to serve as an extension of the judge, and purposeful courtroom set-up and norms conducive to a therapeutic rather than punitive approach. Final Considerations: Transferable recommendations to other specialty docket evaluators and teams which can be adopted to fit a variety of dockets, including mental health court, veterans court, and juvenile court include mandatory judicial training, evolving operations norms, values alignment among the TC team, and a TC coordinator to oversee day-to-day operations. In addition, stakeholder engagement to drive an iterative evaluation process converges with the traditions of action research in community settings.

RESUMEN Este artículo tiene como objetivo explorar de manera detallada el procedimiento para solicitar la prescripción de contravenciones de tránsito, abordando la complejidad asociada con la confusión y falta de conocimiento sobre el trámite adecuado y la aplicación correcta del proceso de prescripción. La investigación adopta un enfoque cualitativo, utilizando métodos como la hermenéutica jurídica, el análisis sintético y el método inductivo deductivo. Se examinan los criterios de la administración pública y los operadores de justicia, analizando sus perspectivas mediante la dogmática jurídica y en concordancia con la normativa ecuatoriana. La investigación pretende ser una guía integral para estudiantes y practicantes del derecho penal, facilitando la adaptación a casos específicos. Entre las conclusiones relevantes se destaca la identificación de varios procedimientos respaldados jurídicamente por las partes involucradas.

ABSTRACT This article aims to explore in detail the procedure for requesting the prescription of traffic violations, addressing the complexity associated with confusion and lack of knowledge about the appropriate procedure and the correct application of the prescription process. The research adopts a qualitative approach, using methods such as legal hermeneutics, synthetic analysis and the inductive-deductive method. The criteria of the public administration and justice operators are examined, analyzing their perspectives through legal dogmatics and in accordance with Ecuadorian regulations. The research aims to be a comprehensive guide for students and practitioners of criminal law, facilitating adaptation to specific cases. Among the relevant conclusions, the identification of several procedures legally supported by the parties involved stands out.

Abstract The paper analyzes seven legal cases from the 1980s brought by the Public Justice of the district of Belém de São Francisco against Cannabis farmers, probably the first cases of this kind. Based on theories of the Flow of the Justice System, the analysis indicates that the slowness in the execution of procedural acts made the conviction of the defendants unfeasible. The cases seem to reveal that the objective of the legal actions was not focused on dismantling criminal groups or agents who acted to structure illicit activity or to punish incriminated individuals more vehemently. Finally, the article explores the inherent contradictions in the priorities of drug policies established by the civil-military dictatorship through law 6368/76, in conjunction with the actions of the judiciary in the analyzed jurisdiction. The type of legal action performed more of a political propaganda function to combat these crops than an action to exterminate said activities. s farmers kind System unfeasible vehemently Finally civilmilitary civil military 636876 6368 76 6368/76 jurisdiction activities 63687 636 7 6368/7 63 6368/ 6

Resumo O trabalho analisa sete processos-crime da década de 1980 instaurados pela Justiça Pública da comarca de Belém de São Francisco contra agricultores de maconha, provavelmente os primeiros processos desse tipo. Baseada em teorias de Fluxo de Processos, a análise sugere que a morosidade no cumprimento dos atos processuais inviabilizou a condenação dos réus. Os processos parecem revelar que o objetivo das ações judiciais não se concentrava no desmantelamento de grupos ou agentes criminosos que atuavam no sentido de estruturar a atividade ilícita, nem em punir mais veementemente os indivíduos incriminados. Por fim, o artigo explora as contradições inerentes às prioridades das políticas de drogas estabelecida pelo ditadura civil-militar, por meio da lei 6368/76, com a ação do judiciário da referida comarca. O tipo de ação desempenhava mais uma função política de propaganda de combate a esses cultivos do que propriamente uma ação de extermínio das referidas atividades. processoscrime crime 198 maconha Processos réus ilícita incriminados fim civilmilitar, civilmilitar civil militar, militar civil-militar 636876 6368 76 6368/76 atividades 19 63687 636 7 6368/7 1 63 6368/ 6

Abstract This study aimed to analyze the arguments mobilized by judges to justify the issuance of preventive detention orders and to observe the existence of a relationship between these arguments and class and race factors. The methodology used was the documentary analysis of interlocutory decisions converting flagrant arrests into preventive detentions, referring to charges of theft and robbery that occurred between 2015 and 2018 in the metropolitan region of Salvador, Brazil. A total of 322 interlocutory decisions to decree preventive detention were analyzed, retrieved from the case files of Salvador Prison/BA, a unit for temporary detainees. At the end of the research, it was concluded that, among the justifications in force in Article 312 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 100% of the decisions analyzed were based on the category of guaranteeing public order, understood as social harmony offended by the dangerousness of the prisoner. This dangerousness is expressed by the concepts of criminal recidivism and modus operandi. It was also concluded that these arguments reproduce class and race stereotypes, since they use mechanisms to naturalize the group most affected by the net of the criminal justice system (young black men), depriving them of the enjoyment of citizenship and protection of fundamental rights. factors detentions 201 Brazil 32 PrisonBA Prison BA Prison/BA detainees research 31 Procedure 100 order prisoner operandi stereotypes young men, men , men) rights 20 3 10 2 1

Resumo Este trabalho foi realizado com o objetivo de analisar os argumentos mobilizados por juízes para justificar a decretação de prisão preventiva, além de observar a existência de relação entre esses argumentos e os fatores de classe e raça. Utilizamos como metodologia a análise documental de decisões interlocutórias que convertem prisões em flagrante em prisões preventivas, referentes a imputações de roubos e furtos ocorridos entre os anos 2015 e 2018 na região metropolitana de Salvador. Foram analisadas 322 decisões interlocutórias de decretação de prisão preventiva, retiradas do arquivo de prontuários do Presídio de Salvador/BA, unidade destinada a presos provisórios. Ao final da pesquisa pode-se concluir que, entre as justificativas vigentes no artigo 312 do Código de Processo Penal, 100% das decisões analisadas se baseavam na categoria de garantia da ordem pública, entendida como harmonia social ofendida pela periculosidade do preso. Essa periculosidade é expressa pelos conceitos de contumácia criminal e modus operandi. Também se chegou à conclusão de que esses argumentos reproduzem estereótipos de classe e raça, tendo em vista que utilizam mecanismos de naturalização do grupo mais atingido pela malha do sistema de justiça penal (jovens negros), retirando-os do gozo da cidadania e proteção de direitos fundamentais. preventiva raça preventivas 201 Salvador 32 SalvadorBA BA Salvador/BA provisórios podese pode 31 Penal 100 pública preso operandi jovens negros, negros , negros) retirandoos retirando fundamentais 20 3 10 2 1