Resumen Introducción. La provincia de Pichincha, Ecuador, es un área endémica de leishmaniasis cutánea, en donde se han determinado como vectores los flebotomíneos antropofílicos con infección natural por Leishmania spp. Sin embargo, no se ha evaluado el papel en la transmisión de las especies zoofílicas. Objetivo. Evaluar la infección natural por Leishmania en dos especies de flebotomíneos zoofílicos, Lutzomyia reburra y Lu. barrettoi majuscula, y en una antropofílica, Lu. trapidoi, así como la endofagia y la sinantropía de estas especies en el noroccidente de Pichincha. Materiales y métodos. Los flebotomíneos se recolectaron en trampas de luz CDC colocadas en diferentes hábitats y altitudes en sitios que son focos de leishmaniasis cutánea. La infección con Leishmania spp. se detectó en el ADN genómico de hembras de las especies de flebotomíneos de interés. Se amplificó el gen espaciador interno de la transcripción del ARN ribosómico, unidad I (ITS1), y los genes de las topoisomerasas mitocondrial II (mtTOPOII) y nuclear II (TopoII). Se determinaron los porcentajes de positividad para Leishmania a escala espaciotemporal, la proporción de endofagia y el índice de sinantropía. Resultados. Se determinó la presencia de infección natural por Le. amazonensis en Lu. reburra (9,5 %) y Lu. b. majuscula (23,8 %); en Lu. trapidoi se detectaron Le. amazonensis, Le. brazilienis y Le. naiffilainsoni. Los flebotomíneos eran asinantrópicos y con baja endofagia. Conclusión. Se registró por primera vez la presencia de infección natural en Lu. reburra y Lu. barrettoi majuscula por Le. amazonensis, y se demostró la importancia de los flebotomíneos zoofílicos en el mantenimiento del ciclo de transmisión de Leishmania spp. en focos endémicos.

Abstract Introduction: The province of Pichincha in Ecuador is an endemic area of cutaneous leishmaniasis, where anthropophilic sand flies with natural infection by Leishmania, have been reported as vectors. However, the role in transmission of zoophilic species has not been evaluated. Objective: To evaluate natural infection by Leishmania in two zoophilic phlebotomine sand fly species, Lutzomyia reburra and Lu. barrettoi majuscula, and one anthropophilic species, Lu. trapidoi, as well as the endophagy and synanthropism of these species in the northwest of Pichincha. Materials and methods: Phlebotomines were collected using CDC light traps in different habitats and altitudes with presence of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Leishmania infection was detected using genomic DNA from females of the collected sand flies. We amplified the internal transcribed spacer gene of ribosomal RNA I (ITS1), the mitochondrial topoisomerase II gene (mtTOPOII), and the nuclear topoisomerase II gene (TopoII). Percentages of positivity for Leishmania, at spatio-temporal scale, proportion of endophagy and synanthropism index were calculated. Results: Natural infection was determined for Le. amazonensis in Lu. reburra (9.5%) and Lu. b. majuscula (23.8%), while in Lu. trapidoi we detected Le. amazonensis, Le. brazilienis and Le. naiffilainsoni. Phlebotomines were asynanthropic and with low endophagy. Conclusion: Natural infection with Le. amazonensis was recorded for the first time in Lu. reburra and Lu. b. majuscula, demonstrating the importance of zoophilic phlebotomines in the maintenance of the Leishmania transmission cycle in endemic foci.

Genetic diversity among three field populations of Lutzomyia longipalpis in Colombia was studied using isozyme analysis. Study sites were as much as 598 km apart and included populations separated by the eastern Cordillera of the Andes. Genetic variability among populations, estimated by heterozygosity, was within values typical for insects in general (8.1%). Heterozygosity for field populations were compared with a laboratory colony from Colombia (Melgar colony) and were only slightly lower. These results suggest that establishment and long term maintenance of the Melgar colony has had little effect on the level of isozyme variability it carries. Genetic divergences between populations was evaluated using estimates of genetic distance. Genetic divergence among the three field populations was low (D=0.021), suggesting they represent local populations within a single species. Genetic distance between field populations and the Melgar colony was also low (D=0.016), suggesting that this colony population does not depart significantly from natural populations. Finally, comparisons were made between Colombian populations and colonies from Brazil and Costa Rica. Genetic distance values were high between Colombian and both Brazil and Costa Rica colony populations (D=0.199 and 0.098 respectively) providing additional support for our earlier report that populations from the three countries represent distinct species