ABSTRACT The adherence to accreditation programs proves the institutions' voluntary effort to pursue the quality and safety of their products and services by meeting internationally accepted standards audited by experts in the field, external to the service. Meeting such standards often exceeds domestic legal requirements. However, service providers are not released from complying with the legal requirements, both local and international, pertinent to the field. Accreditation programs use the precepts of the quality management system to validate and standardize processes, monitor results through quality control, proficiency testing, and indicators, and perform risk management. For cellular therapy services, the assessing agencies available in our field are the AABB/ABHH (American Association of Blood Banks/Brazilian Association of Hematology, Hemotherapy and Cellular Therapy) and FACT-JACIE (Foundation for the Accreditation of Cellular Therapy-Joint Accreditation Committee, ISCT/EBMT). Both agencies require that the accredited organization meets all the standards defined in each program. Applying services also have to establish and comply with a quality management standard that demonstrates procedural interrelationship to ensure product and service quality. This paper aims to concisely outline the essential features of those two accreditation programs, along with a brief overview of the accreditation process under each of them.

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Human T-lymphotropic virus types 1/2 (HTLV-1/2) are distributed worldwide and are endemic in specific regions. METHODS: Serological evaluation of the HTLV-1/2 prevalence and co-infection rate [human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), Chagas disease, and syphilis)] for 2011-2014 was performed with volunteer blood donors from the western part of São Paulo State. RESULTS: Serrana and Araçatuba had higher HTLV seroprevalence rates (0.1%); while Franca, Olimpia, and Bebedouro had lower seroprevalences (0.04%). Co-infection (HBV and syphilis) was present in 12.3% of HTLV-infected blood donors. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide data for the prevalence of HTLV in Brazil and demonstrate the importance of regional and global hemovigilance.

A soroprevalência e a distribuição geográfica do HTLV-1/2 entre os doadores de sangue são extremamente importantes para os serviços de transfusão. Neste trabalho, foi determinada a soroprevalência da infecção pelo HTLV-1/2 entre os doadores de sangue de primeira vez da cidade de Ribeirão Preto e região. No período de Janeiro de 2000 a Dezembro de 2010, 1.038.489 doações de sangue foram obtidas sendo 301.470 doações de primeira vez. Todas as amostras foram avaliadas com testes sorológicos para HTLV-1/2 usando ensaio imunoenzimático (EIA). Adicionalmente, a frequência de coinfecção com o vírus da hepatite B (HBV), vírus da hepatite C (HCV), vírus da imunodeficiência humana (HIV), doença de Chagas (CD) e sífilis também foi determinada. Adicionalmente, foi utilizada uma reação de PCR in-house como teste confirmatório para HTLV-1/2. Um total de 296 (0,1%) doadores de primeira vez foram sorologicamente reativos para HTLV-1/2. O PCR confirmatório de 63 amostras mostrou que 28 eram HTLV-1 positivas, 13 HTLV-2 positivas, 19 negativas e três indeterminadas. Em relação às taxas de coinfecção com HTLV1/2, a maior prevalência foi com HBV (51,3%) e HCV (35,9%), mas a coinfecção com HIV, CD e sífilis também foram detectadas. O número real de indivíduos infectados pelo HTLV-1 e a taxa de coinfecção na população é subestimado e estudos epidemiológicos como esse são muito informativos.

The seroprevalence and geographic distribution of HTLV-1/2 among blood donors are extremely important to transfusion services. We evaluated the seroprevalence of HTLV-1/2 infection among first-time blood donor candidates in Ribeirão Preto city and region. From January 2000 to December 2010, 1,038,489 blood donations were obtained and 301,470 were first-time blood donations. All samples were screened with serological tests for HTLV-1/2 using enzyme immunoassay (EIA). In addition, the frequency of coinfection with hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), Chagas disease (CD) and syphilis was also determined. In-house PCR was used as confirmatory test for HTLV-1/2. A total of 296 (0.1%) first-time donors were serologically reactive for HTLV-1/2. Confirmatory PCR of 63 samples showed that 28 were HTLV-1 positive, 13 HTLV-2 positive, 19 negative and three indeterminate. Regarding HTLV coinfection rates, the most prevalent was with HBV (51.3%) and HCV (35.9%), but coinfection with HIV, CD and syphilis was also detected. The real number of HTLV-infected individual and coinfection rate in the population is underestimated and epidemiological studies like ours are very informative.