Abstract The prediction of load capacity and the control of the execution of the Continuous Flight Auger (CFA) piles are often exercised with components of empiricism and intuition. This fact is often added to the uncertainties arising from the formation of the soils and the limitations of preliminary studies that support the project design. In this context, aiming to aid the executive control of CFA, a semi-empirical method is proposed based on the soil type, geometric dimensions of the piles, and the installation energy obtained during the pile excavation. The method makes it possible to determine the CFA pile load capacity during the execution process of each pile of pilling. As a consequence of the proposed method, the settlement of each pile can be controlled through the quantification of the energy required or the work carried out to excavate each pile through a specific software installed in the machinery monitoring system that increases the safety and reliability of the piling. (CFA intuition design context semiempirical semi empirical type excavation pilling piling

Abstract Allying technology, theory and engineering practice is one of the main challenges of modern foundation engineering. Current foundation and retaining walls designs may lead to oversizing or undersizing due to the spatial variability of the stratigraphic profile. As the design procedure of piled foundations involves defining the setting depth of the tip, sometimes the piles may not behave as expected, as the soil mass may change significantly even in a small region. In this paper, a study was conducted on the geoenergetic behavior of the soil mass and of the piles of a construction site located in Brasília, DF, Brazil. Previous studies showed that the energy needed to drill a continuous flight auger pile (CFAP) can be related to the strength of the drilled strata. Therefore, a methodological framework was built to further discuss how the geomechanical behavior of CFAPs foundations could be assessed by analyzing the energy needed to drill such piles. Statistical methods, in special the Bootstrap method, were used to assess the possible influences of construction procedures on pile behavior. It was studied how the execution energies of piles vary with initial depth and relative position in the terrain, as well as the influences that they suffer because of the order of execution within a same foundation group and due to the proximity to surrounding retaining walls. The proposed methodology can be used to improve the energy control procedure and performance evaluation of CFAPs, allowing a complementary reliability assessment for the foundation and retaining walls designs and implementations.

Abstract The Expander Body pile (EB) is a combination of a cast-in-situ pile method with an inflated, pump-grouted tip. The EB system's pioneering conjunction with the conventional drilling pile technique has improved work load, foundation security, cost reductions and abrupt displacements in lateritic, porous, unsaturated soils. The aim of this article is to analyze settlement estimates of bored piles equipped with the Expander Body System on tropical lateritic soil, using a deformability modulus obtained from laboratory and field tests. The piles were subjected to compression and uplift load tests. In addition, the estimates of the pile settlement are compared with the measured values, and the findings are discussed. The results strongly support that PMT and SPT tests present the optimal ratios between the measured and estimated settlements for both bored piles and bored piles with the Expander Body System. It can also be observed that CPT tests presented reasonable estimates for tensioned piles. Ultimately, it is verified that straightforward elastic models for the settlement assessment of bored piles can be used reliably in practice for piles equipped with the Expander Body System on tropical unsaturated soils.