Resumo A adaptação marginal e interna é fundamental para o sucesso das restaurações indiretas e novos sistemas de imagem permitem avaliar esses parâmetros de maneira não-destrutiva e com precisão. Este estudo avaliou a adaptação marginal e interna de copings de zircônia fabricados com dois sistemas diferentes, utilizando as técnicas da réplica em silicone e micro-CT. Um modelo-mestre de metal, representando um preparo para uma coroa totalmente cerâmica foi digitalizado e copings de zirconia policristalina (Ceramill Zi, Amann Girrbach e inCoris Zi, Dentslpy Sirona, n=10) foram fabricados. Para cada coping, a adaptação marginal e interna foi avaliada pelas técnicas da réplica em silicone e micro-CT. Foram avaliados quatro pontos de cada seção transversal e imagem de micro-CT: adaptação marginal (MG), parede axial (AW), ângulo axial-oclusal (AO) e parede centro-oclusal (MO) utilizando um software de imagem. Os dados foram analisados estatisticamente por ANOVA e teste de Tukey (a=0,05). Não houve diferença estatisticamente significativa entre as duas técnicas para MG e AW. Para AO, houve diferenças significativas entre as técnicas para copings da Amann, enquanto que para copings da Dentsply Sirona foram observados valores semelhantes. Para o MO, ambas as técnicas apresentaram diferenças estatisticamente significativas. Observou-se uma correlação positiva entre os valores de adaptação determinados pelas duas técnicas. O método de avaliação influenciou a avaliação da adaptação marginal e interna de copings de zircônia. Pode-se concluir que a micro-CT mostrou menores valores de adaptação marginal e interna quando comparado com a técnica de réplica em silicone. Os pontos de avaliação da margem e da parede axial mostraram os menores valores de adaptação, independente do sistema cerâmico e da técnica de avaliação utilizados.

Abstract Marginal and internal adaptation is critical for the success of indirect restorations. New imaging systems make it possible to evaluate these parameters with precision and non-destructively. This study evaluated the marginal and internal adaptation of zirconia copings fabricated with two different systems using both silicone replica and microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) assessment methods. A metal master model, representing a preparation for an all-ceramic full crown, was digitally scanned and polycrystalline zirconia copings were fabricated with either Ceramill Zi (Amann-Girrbach) or inCoris Zi (Dentslpy-Sirona), n=10. For each coping, marginal and internal gaps were evaluated by silicone replica and micro-CT assessment methods. Four assessment points of each replica cross-section and micro-CT image were evaluated using imaging software: marginal gap (MG), axial wall (AW), axio-occlusal angle (AO) and mid-occlusal wall (MO). Data were statistically analyzed by factorial ANOVA and Tukey test (a=0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the methods for MG and AW. For AO, there were significant differences between methods for Amann copings, while for Dentsply-Sirona copings similar values were observed. For MO, both methods presented statistically significant differences. A positive correlation was observed determined by the two assessment methods for MG values. In conclusion, the assessment method influenced the evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of zirconia copings. Micro-CT showed lower marginal and internal gap values when compared to the silicone replica technique, although the difference was not always statistically significant. Marginal gap and axial wall assessment points showed the lower gap values, regardless of ceramic system and assessment method used.

Abstract The objective of this study was to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of zirconia copings obtained with different digital scanning methods. A human mandibular first molar was set in a typodont with its adjacent and antagonist teeth and prepared for an all-ceramic crown. Digital impressions were made using an intraoral scanner (3Shape). Polyvinyl siloxane impressions and Type IV gypsum models were also obtained and scanned with a benchtop laboratory scanner (3Shape D700). Ten zirconia copings were fabricated for each group using CAD-CAM technology. The marginal and internal fit of the zirconia copings was assessed by the silicone replica technique. Four sections of each replica were obtained, and each section was evaluated at four points: marginal gap (MG), axial wall (AW), axio-occlusal edge (AO) and centro-occlusal wall (CO), using an image analyzing software. The data were submitted to one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α = 0.05). They showed statistically significant differences for MG, AO and CO. Regarding MG, intraoral scanning showed lower gap values, whereas gypsum model scanning showed higher gap values. Regarding AO and CO, intraoral digital scanning showed lower gap values. Polyvinyl siloxane impression scanning and gypsum model scanning showed higher gap values and were statistically similar. It can be concluded that intraoral digital scanning provided a lower mean gap value, in comparison with conventional impressions and gypsum casts scanned with a standard benchtop laboratory scanner.

AIM: To introduce a modification of the reline impression technique (MRIT), and compare the dimensional changes of impressions obtained by MRIT and by conventional reline impression technique (CRIT).METHODS: An acrylic resin tablet was milled by a CAD-CAM system to simulate three abutments (A, B and C) with different distances among them. The abutments were molded using both impression techniques. For MRIT, before completing the putty silicone polymerization, the relieve procedure was made by compression and it was immediately repositioned to complete the polymerization. Impressions were stored dry at room temperature for different periods (immediately, 1 h, 2 days and 7 days). The distances were obtained by scanning. The differences between the impressions and their respective matrix reference measurements were calculated to determine the dimensional changes. Data were subjected to ANOVA and Tukey's test (p<0.05).RESULTS: For AB and BC distances, there was no statistically significant difference between CRIT and MRIT (p=0.0597 and p=0.2167, respectively). For AC, there was statistically significant difference between the techniques for the immediate storage time (p=0.006). In general, for CRIT the material showed expansion, while for MRIT it showed contraction.CONCLUSIONS: It was verified that the addition silicon impressions obtained by both impression techniques showed dimensional stability, except for the immediate time-point.