RESUMO Este trabalho é uma contribuição ao estudo das emoções no discurso e seu impacto sociointerativo, tomando as emoções como constitutivas das relações de troca, numa abordagem discursiva. A partir da análise de interações verbais observadas e repertoriadas em contexto francófono (DE OLIVEIRA, 2014, 2015): (i) associamos a deslocação pronominal à direita (LAMBRECHT, 1994; NØLKE, 1997) ao sentimento de aborrecimento do locutor (PLANTIN; DOURY; TRAVERSO, 2000; PLANTIN, 2011); (ii) mostramos de que maneira esse comportamento linguístico (global → particular) é incompatível com o contrato de cooperação (GRICE, 1975); e (iii) postulamos sobre as consequências negativas desse comportamento nas relações entre os participantes das trocas (JOBERT, 2010; KERBRAT-ORECCHIONI, 2010). As marcas linguísticas da presença do sujeito discursivo possibilitam especular sobre a imagem que ele dá de si (BROWN; LEVINSON, 1987). Por fundamentar-se na linguística aplicada, esta proposta visa atuar na conscientização dos locutores sobre o poder e o impacto da linguagem nas práticas cotidianas.

ABSTRACT This work is a contribution to the study of emotions in discourse and its socio-interative impact, considering emotions as constitutive of exchanges, in a discoursive approach. From the analysis of verbal interactions observed and assimilated in a French-speaking context (DE OLIVEIRA 2014, 2015), (i) we associate the right dislocation construction (LAMBRECHT 1994, NØLKE 1997) with the speaker’s annoyance (PLANTIN, DOURY, TRAVERSO 2000, PLANTIN 2011); (ii) demonstrate how this linguistic behavior (global → particular) is incompatible with the principle of cooperation (GRICE 1975), and (iii) postulate the negative consequences of this behavior in the relations between the participants of exchanges (JOUBERT 2010, KERBRAT-ORECCHIONI 2010). The linguistic markers of the discursive subject’s presence make it possible to speculate about the image he gives of himself (BROWN and LEVINSON 1987). Primarily based on Applied Linguistics, this proposal aims to promote the awareness of speakers about the power and the impact of language in everyday practices.

In this paper, I seek to analyze linguistic impoliteness in ordinary conversation in French and, more specifically, in the exchange of face-to-face information. Thanks to its functional structure (i.e. question-response), the exchange of information is a privileged type of interaction, in which we can observe the relationship between language and culture. Throughout a study of interactional mechanisms involving the recurring negative sequence (a) Je ne sais pas moi (literally : I don’t know, me), I interrogate what distinguishes (a) to the sequence (b) Moi je ne sais pas(literally : Me, I don’t know).Why and in which situations, or at which point in an interaction, does the speaker employ (a) rather than (b) or vice versa? What are the socio-interactive effects? What emerges from these comparisons in relation to the speaker’s style? My suggestion is to bring out some response elements throughout a theoretical and methodological combinatory approach inputs from the linguistic polyphony, conversational analysis, the grammar of the emotions and the concept of [im]politeness.

Dans cette contribution, nous nous proposons d’aborder la question de l’impolitesse linguistique en français dans le cadre de la conversation ordinaire et plus précisément dans l’échange d’informations. De par son caractère éminemment fonctionnel, l’échange d’informations constitue un lieu privilégié d’observation des rapports entre langue et culture. À travers une étude de mécanismes interactionnels (i.e. question-réponse), notamment de la séquence/réponse négative récurrente je ne sais pas moi, nous nous demanderons ce qui distingue cette construction-là de celle-ci je ne sais pas; pourquoi et dans quelles situations, ou à quel moment de l’interaction, le locuteur emploie celle-là plutôt que celle-ci ou vice-versa ? Quels sont les effets socio interactifs produits ? Qu’en ressort-il au niveau du profil du locuteur ? Les éléments de réponse que nous apporterons à ces questions s’appuient sur une approche théorique et méthodologique combinatoire des apports de la polyphonie linguistique, l’analyse conversationnelle, la grammaire des émotions et le concept d’impolitesse.

Este artigo se insere na área de lingüística contrastiva. Aqui analisamos o pronome francês "ça" na sua função de dêitico em português do Brasil. As principais características deste elemento serão expostas na nossa introdução. O objetivo é de mostrar a versatilidade gramatical de "ça" assim como sua freqüência em francês contemporâneo. Nossa escolha de trabalhar sobre a dêixis foi motivada, de um lado, pelo papel de "ça" na distinção perto/longe, e de outro lado, pela divergência básica que há entre a organização do espaço (físico) em língua francesa e em língua portuguesa, a saber, a primeira se apóia num sistema binário enquanto que a segunda conhece um sistema ternário.

Guided by the principles of comparative linguistics, the objective of this study is to demonstrate the gramatical versatility of 'ça' as frequently used in contemporary French language. The French pronoun 'ça' is analysed in terms of its deictic function in Portugese from Brazil. The principal characteristics of this element are elaborated in the introduction. Our interest in the subject of deictics is motivated in part, by the role of 'ça', as distinguished by near/far, and by the basic divergence between the organization of physical space in French and in Portugese, the former which makes use of a binary system, and the latter a ternary system.