Diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the West. In Brazil, it is the fifth cause of cancer, with more than 55,000 cases and 26,000 deaths per year. At Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo - HCFMUSP, diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma represents 49.7% of all non-Hodgkin lymphoma cases. Initially, the classification of non-Hodgkin lymphoma was based on morphology, but advances in immunology and molecular medicine allowed the introduction of a biological classification for these diseases. As for other cancers, non-Hodgkin lymphoma involves patterns of multi factorial pathogenesis with environmental factors, as well as genetic, occupational and dietary factors, contributing to its development. Multiple lesions involving molecular pathways of B-cell proliferation and differentiation may result in the activation of oncogenes such as the BCL2, BCL6,and MYC genes and the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes such as p53 and INK4, as well as other important transcription factors such as OCT-1 and OCT-2. A dramatic improvement in survival was seen after the recent introduction of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. The association of this antibody to the cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin, oncovin and prednisolone (CHOP) regimen has increased overall survival of diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma patients by 20%. However, 50% of all diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma patients remain incurable, creating a demand for more research with new advances in treatment. Thus, it is important to know and understand the key factors and molecular pathways involved in the pathogenesis of diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma.

INTRODUÇÃO: Tecidos fixados em formalina e emblocados em parafina (FFEP) são importantes fontes de amostras para estudos retrospectivos. Apesar de sua capacidade de preservação de proteínas e morfologia celular, a formalina interfere negativamente em testes de biologia molecular por fragmentar e modificar quimicamente os ácidos nucleicos, particularmente o ácido ribonucleico (RNA). OBJETIVO: Comparar a eficiência de três diferentes protocolos de extração de RNA para análise de expressão gênica de tecidos FFEP. MATERIAL E MÉTODOS: Amostras de linfonodo humano FEEP foram submetidas à extração de RNA utilizando-se os kits Ambion e Arcturus Bioscience e o método clássico de Trizol. Após a extração, o RNA foi quantificado e testado quanto à sua capacidade de amplificação pela reação em cadeia da polimerase em tempo real (RT-PCR) utilizando primers do gene endógeno gliceraldeído-3 fosfato desidrogenase (GAPDH). DISCUSSÃO/CONCLUSÃO: Todos os protocolos testados produziram quantidades adequadas e suficientes de RNA total, entretanto, somente os protocolos com uso dos kits Ambion e Arcturus produziram RNA capaz de ser amplificado pela PCR.

INTRODUCTION: Formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissues are an important sample source for retrospective studies. Despite its ability to preserve proteins and cell morphology, formalin hinders Molecular Biology tests once it fragments and chemically modifies nucleic acids, particularly RNA. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficiency of three different RNA extraction protocols for gene expression analysis of FFEP tissues. MATERIAL AND METHODS: RNA was extracted from FFPE samples of human lymph by means of Ambion and Arcturus Bioscience kits and the classical Trizol method. After extraction, RNA was quantified and tested for amplification through real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using glyceraldehydes-3 phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) endogenous gene primers. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: All the protocols produced sufficient and adequate amounts of total RNA. However, only protocols using Arcturus and Ambion kits generated suitable RNA for PCR amplification.