RESUMO: Amostras de leite foram coletadas de tanques de refrigeração (após 48h de refrigeração) em cinco fazendas de produção e do respectivo caminhão tanque (leite de conjunto, LC) ao chegar à indústria beneficiadora. Análises físico químicas de rotina e quantificação das populações de bactérias psicrotróficas ( Pseudomonas spp. e P. fluorescens ) e aeróbios mesófilos (AM) foram realizadas. Apenas os valores de densidade relativa e acidez titulável de amostras de leite de três fazendas estavam de acordo com a legislação. No LC, apenas o teor de proteína não atingiu o valor mínimo estabelecido por lei, e a contagem foi realizada para AM (>105 unidades formadoras de colônias (UFC) mL-1) e psicrotróficos (2,8x106UFC mL-1). A contagem de Pseudomonas spp. correspondeu a 17,9% da população de psicrotróficos, e 3,4% da contagem de Pseudomonas spp. eram da espécie P. fluorescens . Nas amostras de leite das fazendas de produtoras, as contagens foram variáveis para AM (3,4x105a 3,7x107UFC mL-1), psicrotróficos (4,0x104 a 3,1x106UFC mL-1), Pseudomonas spp. (2,3x104 a 1,8x105UFC mL-1) e P. fluorescens (62 a 8,4x103UFC mL-1). Para as populações estudadas, nenhuma diferença estatística (P>0,05) foi observada entre as contagens encontradas nas amostras de leite coletadas nas fazendas (tanques de resfriamento) e do LC. Portanto, o gênero Pseudomonas spp. e a espécie P. fluorescens não foram os psicrotróficos mais frequentes nesta linha de transporte de leite estudada.

ABSTRACT: Raw milk samples were collected from cooling tanks (after they cooled for 48 h) in five dairy farms and the corresponding bulk tank (bulk milk transportation, BMT) when they arrived to the industry. Routine physical chemical analyzes and quantification of psychrotrophic ( Pseudomonas spp. and P. fluorescens ) and aerobic mesophilic (AM) populations were performed. Only relative density and titratable acidity values for samples of milk from three farms were in agreement to the quality parameters required by law. In the BMT, only the protein content has not reached the minimum value established by law, and counting was performed for AM (>105 colony forming units (CFU) mL-1) and psychrotrophic bacteria (2.8x106CFU mL-1). Pseudomonas spp. counting corresponded to 17.9% of the psychrotrophic population, and P. fluorescens was 3.4% of Pseudomonas spp . count. In milk samples from dairy farms, counts were variable for AM (3.4x105 to 3.7 x107CFU mL-1), psychrotrophic (4.0x104 to 3.1x106CFU mL-1), Pseudomonas spp. (2.3x104 to 1.8x105CFU mL-1), and P. fluorescens (62 to 8.4x103CFU mL-1). For the populations studied, no statistical difference (P>0.05) was observed between counts reported in milk samples collected in dairy farms (cooling tanks) and BMT. Therefore, the genera Pseudomonas spp. and P. fluorescens were not the most frequent psychrotrophic bacteria in this studied milk transportation line.

The use of efficient methods for the early diagnosis of subclinical mastitis is of great importance in milk production. By using an electrical conductivity meter (EC), the efficiency of subclinical mastitis diagnosis was evaluated in dairy farms in northern Parana, Brazil, and the results were compared with those obtained by using the California Mastitis Test and the Somatic Cell Count (SCC). Samples from 941 quarters of 259 cows of the Holstein and Jersey breeds were analyzed in four dairy farms between June and July 2014. The EC method correctly evaluated 54.8% of the samples (264 samples with subclinical mastitis) and 250 without infection when compared with the diagnosis by CMT. Of the 445 samples diagnosed as positive by EC, 19.7% were classified by CMT with score 2 and 24.7% with score 3. Of the samples with negative results (496), most of them had scores 0 and 1 (50.4% and 21.4 %). The correlations between EC and SCC (r = 0.14) and EC and CMT (r = 0.17) were positive but low, which generated false positive and false negative results of subclinical mastitis in the herd.

El uso de métodos eficientes para el diagnóstico rápido de la mastitis subclínica es de gran importancia en la producción de leche. Mediante el empleo de un medidor de conductividad eléctrica (CE), se evaluó la eficacia del diagnóstico de mastitis subclínica en granjas de leche del norte de Paraná, en Brasil, y se compararon los resultados con la Prueba de California para Mastitis (CMT, del inglés California Mastitis Test) y con el conteo de células somáticas (CCS). Se analizaron 941 cuartos mamarios, obtenidos de 259 vacas de las razas Holstein y Jersey en cuatro granjas lecheras, entre junio y julio de 2014. La CE evaluó correctamente 54,8% de las muestras (264 muestras con mastitis subclínica) y 250 sin infección en comparación con el diagnóstico de CMT. De las 445 muestras diagnosticadas como positiva para EC, 19,7% se clasificaron por la CMT, con una puntuación de 2 y 24,7% con una puntuación de 3. Entre los resultados negativos (496 muestras), la mayoría de las muestras tuvieron una puntuación entre 0 y 1 (50,4% y 21,4%). Hubo una correlación positiva (p <0.001); sin embargo, resultó baja entre CE y CCS (r = 0.14) y CE y CMT (r = 0.17), por lo que generaron resultados falsos positivos y falsos negativos de la mastitis subclínica en el hato.