A revacinação com BCG foi introduzida no Brasil em meados dos anos 90 e desde então não foram conduzidos estudos que avaliassem a cobertura vacinal alcançada por meio de investigação da cicatriz do BCG. Nesse sentido, foram estudados 2.785 adolescentes de 13-14 anos matriculados em escolas públicas da cidade de Belo Horizonte, Estado de Minas Gerais, entre setembro de 2001 e maio de 2002. A prevalência da revacinação foi de 64,3% (IC 95%: 62,5-66,0). Os esforços empreendidos para obter tais níveis de cobertura conflitam com a falta de evidências sobre sua efetividade e recomendam a reavaliação da continuidade da revacinação nos serviços de saúde brasileiros.

BCG revaccination was introduced in Brazil in the mid-90's but no study has evaluated vaccine coverage through direct assessment of the scar. BCG scars were assessed in 2,785 public school adolescents, aged 13 to 14 years, in Southeastern Brazil, between September 2001 and May 2002. The prevalence rate of revaccination was 64.3% (95% CI: 62.5-66.0). Despite the efforts to implement and sustain revaccination, continuing this practice should be reevaluated by public health authorities due to the lack of evidence on its effectiveness.

A revacinação com BCG foi introduzida no Brasil em meados dos anos 90 e desde então não foram conduzidos estudos que avaliassem a cobertura vacinal alcançada por meio de investigação da cicatriz do BCG. Nesse sentido, foram estudados 2.785 adolescentes de 13-14 anos matriculados em escolas públicas da cidade de Belo Horizonte, Estado de Minas Gerais, entre setembro de 2001 e maio de 2002. A prevalência da revacinação foi de 64,3% (IC 95%: 62,5-66,0). Os esforços empreendidos para obter tais níveis de cobertura conflitam com a falta de evidências sobre sua efetividade e recomendam a reavaliação da continuidade da revacinação nos serviços de saúde brasileiros.

BCG revaccination was introduced in Brazil in the mid-90's but no study has evaluated vaccine coverage through direct assessment of the scar. BCG scars were assessed in 2,785 public school adolescents, aged 13 to 14 years, in Southeastern Brazil, between September 2001 and May 2002. The prevalence rate of revaccination was 64.3% (95% CI: 62.5-66.0). Despite the efforts to implement and sustain revaccination, continuing this practice should be reevaluated by public health authorities due to the lack of evidence on its effectiveness.

We monitored the susceptibility to penicillin of invasive strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae in two reference laboratories; 502 positive cultures from patients with an active invasive infectious process were analyzed. Streptococcus pneumoniae was identified through conventional procedures, and the oxacillin disc diffusion method was used to check for penicillin susceptibility. Statistical analysis included calculations of the frequency distribution, with 95% confidence intervals (CI), as well as chi-square tests and chi-square for linear trend for temporal analysis of susceptibility. The bacterium was isolated from patients less than a year old (40.7% of the isolates), from infants (55.9%), and from individuals less than 15 years old (64.4%). The majority (88.2%, 95% CI = 85.5%-91.1%) of the 502 isolates were susceptible to penicillin. There was no significant temporal trend of elevation of resistance rate during the study period (p=0.56). We conclude that resistance of S. pneumoniae to penicillin is not yet an important clinical-epidemiological concern in the State of Minas Gerais. To provide necessary support for the adoption of therapeutic and prophylactic measures, epidemiological surveillance should be implemented at a national level to monitor the profile of susceptibility/resistance of S. pneumoniae to penicillin and other antimicrobials.