Abstract Introduction Prenatal exposure to the Zika virus can impair neurodevelopment and cause auditory damage. Objective To analyze the frequency-following response (FFR) and the auditory behavior (with the LittlEars® questionnaire) of children with and without prenatal exposure to Zika virus infection. Methods A total of 30 children participated in the present study, divided into 3 groups: 10 children with microcephaly and prenatal exposure to the Zika virus; 10 normocephalic children with prenatal exposure to the Zika virus; and 10 children with no evidence of prenatal exposure to the virus. The FFR test was performed with the /da/ syllable. The LittlEars® questionnaire was used with parents/guardians. Results For the FFR measurements, there was no difference between the groups. The children with exposure to the Zika virus presented a final score in the questionnaire below what is expected from children with normal hearing. A significant difference was observed for the final, semantic, and expressive scores between the group with microcephaly and the other groups. A strong negative correlation was seen between the LittlEars® questionnaire final score and the FFR measurements for the group with microcephaly when compared with the other groups. Conclusion Children exposed to the Zika virus, with and without microcephaly, presented FFR patterns similar to what was seen in children with no evidence of virus exposure. However, they showed signs of immature auditory behavior, suggesting auditory development delay.

RESUMO Objetivo Caracterizar os parâmetros de aquisição, análise e resultados do exame Frequency Following Response (FFR) em usuários de implante coclear. Estratégia de pesquisa As buscas foram realizadas nas bases Cochrane Library, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (LILACS), Ovid Technologies, PubMed, SciELO, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science e na literatura cinzenta. Critérios de seleção Foram incluídos estudos sobre o FFR em usuários de implante coclear ou que os comparassem à indivíduos com audição normal, sem restrição de idade. Foram excluídos estudos secundários e experimentais. Não houve restrição de idioma e ano de publicação. Análise dos dados Os dados foram analisados e redigidos de acordo com as etapas do Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyse (PRISMA) 2020. Para análise da qualidade metodológica foi utilizado o instrumento Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross Sectional Studies. As divergências foram resolvidas por um terceiro pesquisador. Resultados Seis estudos atenderam aos critérios de inclusão. Apenas um estudo foi do tipo comparativo com grupo controle de indivíduos com audição normal. As variações nos parâmetros de aquisição foram comuns e as análises predominaram no domínio do tempo. Usuários de implante coclear apresentaram diferenças nos resultados do FFR quando comparados a indivíduos com audição normal, considerando a literatura existente. A maioria dos artigos teve baixa qualidade metodológica. Conclusão Não existe padronização de um protocolo de aquisição e análise para o FFR em usuários de implante coclear. Os resultados são de alto risco de viés.

ABSTRACT Purpose To characterize the acquisition parameters, analysis, and results of the frequency-following response (FFR) in cochlear implant users. Research strategies The search was conducted in Cochrane Library, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), Ovid Technologies, PubMed, SciELO, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, and gray literature. Selection criteria Studies on FFR in cochlear implant users or that compared them with normal-hearing people, with no restriction of age, were included. Secondary and experimental studies were excluded. There was no restriction of language or year of publication. Data analysis The data were analyzed and reported according to the stages in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), 2020. The methodological quality was analyzed with the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Analytical Cross-Sectional Studies. Divergences were solved by a third researcher. Results Six studies met the inclusion criteria. Only one study was comparative, whose control group comprised normal-hearing people. The variations in acquisition parameters were common and the analysis predominantly approached the time domain. Cochlear implant users had different FFR results from those of normal-hearing people, considering the existing literature. Most articles had low methodological quality. Conclusion There is no standardized FFR acquisition and analysis protocol for cochlear implant users. The results have a high risk of bias.

RESUMO Objetivo: analisar o uso de uma ferramenta de rastreio pelo professor, para identificar o comportamento auditivo de estudantes no ciclo de alfabetização. Métodos: estudo de corte transversal realizado na região metropolitana do Recife. Participaram 22 estudantes que responderam ao questionário Fisher’s auditory problems checklist (QFISHER). A análise do questionário foi realizada considerando as categorias: audição; atenção; memória; linguagem e desempenho escolar. Foi utilizado o teste estatístico Qui-Quadrado e Mann-Whitney para comparar o escore entre as faixas etárias avaliadas, considerando o nível de significância de 5%. Resultados: no QFISHER a pior frequência foi para o desempenho escolar (87,72%), seguido da atenção (62,10%), linguagem (60,53%) e audição (59,65%). A mediana evidenciou pior avaliação para o desempenho escolar (100,0%) seguido da atenção (60,0%). O escore global do QFISHER foi de 66,7% e quando comparado entre as faixas etárias, verificou-se que não houve diferença significante para os domínios avaliados. Conclusão: o QFISHER, enquanto ferramenta de rastreio utilizado pelo professor no ciclo de alfabetização, pode identificar alterações comportamentais sugestivas de transtorno do processamento auditivo, ampliando a possibilidade de intervenções precoces.

ABSTRACT Purpose: to analyze the use of a screening tool, by teachers, to identify the auditory behavior of students who are learning to read and write. Methods: a cross-sectional study including 22 students who answered the Fisher’s Auditory Problems Checklist (QFISHER). The analysis of this questionnaire approached the categories of hearing, attention, memory, language, and school performance. The chi-square statistical test and Mann-Whitney test were used to compare the scores between the age groups, considering the 5% significance level. Results: school performance had the worst frequency in QFISHER (87.72%), followed by attention (62.10%), language (60.53%), and hearing (59.65%). The median revealed worse assessment in school performance (100.0%) followed by attention (60.0%). The QFISHER overall score was 66.7%. The comparison between age groups did not reveal any significant difference for the domains assessed. Conclusion: the QFISHER, used by teachers, as a screening tool for children who are learning to read and write, can identify behavioral changes suggestive of auditory processing disorder, broadening the possibility of early interventions.

RESUMO Objetivo: investigar o pós-mascaramento em marcações com predominância de picos positivos comparado com as marcações com predominância de picos negativos nos registros de Frequency-Following Response (FFR) em indivíduos adultos jovens com audição normal. Métodos: trata-se de um estudo conduzido a partir de um banco de dados, onde foram selecionados 20 registros do FFR (10 homens; 10 mulheres, com idade entre 18 e 25 anos, com a audição normal) e realizada análise qualitativa por duas examinadoras experientes. Os registros foram analisados segundo dois protocolos distintos de marcação dos registros: (i) análise com predominância de picos positivos - marcação das ondas PV, A, PW, PX, PY, PZ e O; e, (ii) análise com predominância de picos negativos - marcação das ondas V, A, C, D, E, F e O. Foram realizados o teste de normalidade Shapiro-Wilk, o teste de Wilcoxon e o teste t de Student. Foi adotado o nível de significância de p<0,05. Resultados: a análise comparativa das marcações realizadas não mostrou diferença significante entre os protocolos estudados. Nos valores de desvio padrão, foram observados valores absolutos mais elevados quando houve a marcação dos picos negativos quando comparado com as respostas obtidas com a marcação dos picos positivos, demonstrando um padrão inverso ao que se espera. Conclusão: o pós-mascaramento foi identificado em ambas marcações propostas, sendo as marcações com predominância dos picos positivos se mostraram menos variáveis.

ABSTRACT Purpose: to investigate forward masking by comparing latencies values of positive and negative peaks in frequency-following responses (FFR) recordings, in normally hearing young adults. Methods: from a database, 20 FFR recordings were selected, 10 being from men, and 10 from women, aged 18 to 25 years, with normal hearing. They were qualitatively analyzed by two experienced researchers and also analyzed, according to two different protocols of recording identification: (i) predominance of positive peaks - PV, A, PW, PX, PY, PZ, and O waves; and (ii) predominance of negative peaks - V, A, C, D, E, F, and O waves. The Shapiro-Wilk normality test, the Wilcoxon test, and the Student’s t-test were conducted, by adopting the significance level of p<0.05. Results: the comparative analysis of latency peak values did not reveal any significant difference between the studied protocols. However, the standard deviation was higher for absolute latency values as compared to negative peaks, suggesting an inverted pattern of what was expected. Conclusion: forward masking was identified in both proposals and the protocol of predominant positive peaks was less variable.