Abstract Background: Our objective was to compare the safety and efficacy of Target-Controlled Infusion (TCI) versus intermittent bolus of propofol for colonoscopy sedation. Methods: We conducted a randomized (1:1), single-blind, parallel-group superiority trial with fifty ASA I or II patients, both sexes, aged 18 to 65 years, Body Mass Index ≤ 30 kg.mr-2, undergoing colonoscopy, allocated to receive propofol by TCI (effect-site, 2 μg.mL-1 plus 0.5 μg.mL-1 until unconsciousness and as necessary for agitation) or intermittent bolus (1 mg.kg-1 plus 0.5 mg.kg-1 every 5 minutes or as above). The primary safety outcome was the need for airway maneuvers and the primary efficacy outcome was the need for interventions to adjust the level of sedation. Secondary outcomes included incidence of agitation, propofol dose, and time to recovery. Results: The median (IQR) number of airway maneuvers and interventions needed to adjust sedation was 0 (0-0) vs. 0 (0-0) (p = 0.239) and 1 (0-1) vs. 3 (1-4) (p < 0.001) in the TCI and control groups, respectively. Agitation was more common in the intermittent bolus group - 2 (0-2) vs. 1 (0-1), p < 0.001. The mean ± SD time to recovery was 4.9 ± 1.4 minutes in the TCI group vs. 2.3 ± 1.6 minutes in the control group (p < 0.001). The total propofol dose was higher in the TCI group (234 ± 46 μg.kg-1.min-1 vs. 195 ± 44 μg.kg-1.min-1 (p = 0.040)). Conclusions: During colonoscopy, TCI is as safe as intermittent bolus of propofol while reducing the incidence of agitation and the need for dose adjustments. However, intermittent bolus administration was associated with lower total propofol dose and earlier recovery.

Abstract Background: Conventional dental care is often impossible in patients with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Non-collaborative behaviors, sometimes associated with aggressiveness, are usual justifications for premedication in this population. Thereby, this research focuses on the effects of oral midazolam versus oral ketamine plus midazolam as preanesthetic medication in ASD. Methods: The sample included 64 persons with ASD, aged 2-59 years, scheduled for dental care under general anesthesia. The primary objective of this study was to compare degrees of sedation between two parallel, double-blinded, equally proportional groups randomized to receive oral midazolam (0.5 mg.kg−1, maximum 15 mg) or oral midazolam (0.5 mg.kg−1) associated with oral S(+)-ketamine (3 mg.kg−1, maximum 300 mg). The secondary outcomes were the need of physical stabilization to obtain intravenous line, awakening time, and occurrence of adverse events. Results: According to the dichotomous analysis of sedation level (Ramsay score 1 and 2 versus Ramsay ≥ 3), oral association of S(+)-ketamine and midazolam improved sedation, with increased probability of Ramsay ≥ 3, Relative Risk (RR) = 3.2 (95% Confidence Interval [95% CI] = 1.32 to 7.76) compared to midazolam alone. Combined treatment also made it easier to obtain venous access without physical stabilization, RR = 2.05 (95% CI = 1.14 to 3.68). There were no differences between groups regarding awakening time and the occurrence of adverse events. Conclusion: The association of oral S(+)-ketamine with midazolam provides better preanesthetic sedation rates than midazolam alone and facilitates intravenous line access in patients with autism.

Abstract Background: Service quality in anesthesiology has been frequently measured by morbidity and mortality. This measure increasingly considers patient satisfaction, which is the result of care from the client’s perspective. Therefore, anesthesiologists must be able to build relationships with patients, provide understandable information and involve them in decisions about their anesthesia. This study aimed to evaluate the peri-anesthetic care provided by the anesthesia service in an ambulatory surgery unit using the Heidelberg Peri-anaesthetic Questionnaire. Methods: This cross-sectional study used the Heidelberg Peri-anaesthetic Questionnaire to evaluate 1211 patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. We selected questions that showed a greater degree of dissatisfaction and correlated them with patient characterization data (age, sex, education, and ASA physical status), anesthesia data (type, time, and prior experience), and surgical specialty. Results: Questions in which patients tended to show dissatisfaction involved fear of anesthesia and surgery, feeling cold, the urgent need to urinate, pain at the surgical site, and the team’s level of concern and speed of response in relieving the patient’s pain. Conclusion: The Heidelberg Peri-anaesthetic Questionnaire proved to be a useful tool in identifying points of dissatisfaction, mainly fear of anesthesia and surgery, feeling cold, the urgent need to urinate, pain at the surgical site, and the team's level of concern and speed of response in relieving the patient's pain in the population studied. These were correlated with patient, anesthesia, and surgical variables. This allows the establishment of priorities at the different points of care, with the ultimate goal of improving patient satisfaction regarding anesthesia care.

Abstract Background Compound A is generated by sevoflurane when it reacts with carbon dioxide absorbers with strong bases at minimal fresh gas flow (FGF) and is nephrotoxic in animals. No conclusive data has shown increased risk in humans. The aim of this study was to investigate if minimal FGF promotes an increase in the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) when compared to high FGF in patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery under sevoflurane anesthesia. Methods Two hundred and four adult patients scheduled for on-pump cardiac surgery under sevoflurane anesthesia were randomly allocated to two groups differentiated by FGF: minimal FGF (0.5 L.min−1) or high FGF (2.0 L.min−1). Baseline creatinine measured before surgery was compared daily to values assayed on the first five postoperative days, and 24-hour urinary output was monitored, according to the KDIGO (Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes) guideline to define postoperative cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (CSA-AKI). Creatinine measurements were also obtained 20 and 120 days after hospital discharge. Results Postoperative AKI occurred in 55 patients, 26 patients (29.5%) in the minimal FGF group and 29 patients (31.5%) in the high FGF group (p= 0.774). Twenty days after discharge, 11 patients (6.1%) still had CSA-AKI and 120 days after discharge only 2 patients (1.6%) still had CSA-AKI. Conclusions When compared to high FGF, minimal FGF sevoflurane anesthesia during on-pump cardiac surgery is not associated with increased risk of postoperative AKI in this population at high risk for renal injury.

Abstract Background The influence of different crystalloid solutions infused during deceased-donor kidney transplant on the incidence of delayed graft function remains unclear. We investigated the influence of Plasma-Lyte® vs. 0.9% saline on the incidence of delayed graft function in deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients. Methods We conducted a single-blind randomized controlled trial of 104 patients aged 18 to 65 years who underwent deceased-donor kidney transplant under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either Plasma-Lyte® (n = 52) or 0.9% saline (n = 52), at the same infusion volume, for intraoperative fluid replacement. The primary outcome was the occurrence of delayed graft function. Secondary outcomes included metabolic and electrolytic changes at the end of surgery. Results Two patients in the Plasma-Lyte® group and one in the 0.9% saline group died postoperatively and were not included for analysis. The incidence of delayed graft function in Plasma-Lyte® and 0.9% saline groups were 60.0% (95% Confidence Interval [95% CI 46.2-72.4]) and 74.5% (95% CI 61.1-84.4), respectively (p= 0.140). Mean (standard deviation) values of immediate postoperative pH and serum chloride levels in Plasma-Lyte® and 0.9% saline groups were 7.306 (0.071) and 7.273 (0.061) (p= 0.013), and 99.6 (4.2) mEq.L-1 and 103.3 (5.6) mEq.L-1, respectively (p< 0.001). All other postoperative metabolic and electrolyte variables were not statistically different at the immediate postoperative period (p> 0.05). Conclusion In deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients, the incidence of delayed graft function is not influenced by Plasma-Lyte® or 0.9% saline used for intraoperative fluid replacement.

Resumo Justificativa e objetivos: As incidências de parada cardíaca (PC) e de mortalidade perioperatória no Brasil, um país em desenvolvimento, são mais elevadas em relação às dos países desenvolvidos. A hipótese desta revisão é que o conhecimento da epidemiologia de PC e de mortalidade perioperatória no Brasil possibilita sua comparação com a dos países desenvolvidos. A revisão sistemática teve como objetivo verificar, em estudos realizados no Brasil, a epidemiologia de PC e de mortalidade perioperatória. Conteúdo: Realizou-se estratégia de busca em diferentes bases de dados (PubMed, EMBASE, SciELO e LILACS) para a identificação de estudos observacionais que reportaram PC e/ou mortalidade perioperatória até 48 horas pós-operatório no Brasil. Os desfechos primários foram dados de epidemiologia de PC e de mortalidade perioperatória. Em 8 estudos nacionais, identificou- se maior ocorrência de PC e de mortalidade perioperatória no sexo masculino, em extremos de idade, em pacientes em pior estado físico segundo a American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), em cirurgias de emergência, em anestesia geral, e em cirurgias cardíaca, torácica, vascular, abdominal e neurológica. A doença/condição do paciente foi o principal fator desencadeante, tendo como causas principais a sepse e o trauma. Conclusões: Nos estudos nacionais, a epidemiologia dos eventos tanto de PC como de mortalidade perioperatória não apresenta diferenças importantes, e de maneira geral, é semelhante à de estudos de países desenvolvidos. Entretanto, a sepse, nos estudos nacionais, representa uma das principais causas de PC e de mortalidade perioperatória, diferenciando-se dos estudos de países desenvolvidos nos quais a sepse é causa secundária.

Abstract Background and objectives: The perioperative cardiac arrest (CA) and mortality rates in Brazil, a developing country, are higher than in developed countries. The hypothesis of this review was that knowledge of the epidemiology of perioperative CA and mortality in Brazil enables the comparison with developed countries. The systematic review aimed to verify, in studies conducted in Brazil, the epidemiology of perioperative CA and mortality. Method and results: A search strategy was carried out on different databases (PubMed, EMBASE, SciELO and LILACS) to identify observational studies that reported perioperative CA and/or mortality up to 48 hours postoperatively in Brazil. The primary outcomes were data on epidemiology of perioperative CA and mortality. In 8 Brazilian studies, there was a higher occurrence of perioperative CA and mortality in males; in extremes of age; in patients in worse physical status according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA); in emergency surgeries; in general anesthesia; and in cardiac, thoracic, vascular, abdominal and neurological surgeries. The patient's disease/condition was the main triggering factor, with sepsis and trauma as the main causes. Conclusions: The epidemiology of both perioperative CA and mortality events reported in Brazilian studies does not show important differences and, in general, is similar to studies in developed countries. However, sepsis represents one of the major causes of perioperative CA and mortality in Brazilian studies, contrasting with studies in developed countries in which sepsis is a secondary cause.

RESUMO JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: As experiências dolorosas as quais o recém-nascido é submetido podem ter relação com reações futuras e que existem diferenças no comportamento de resposta à dor nos recém-nascidos oriundos de diferentes vias de parto. O estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a resposta à dor em bebês nascidos por cesariana e parto vaginal. MÉTODOS: Estudo coorte prospectivo que incluiu recém-nascidos nascidos a termo, de cesariana e parto vaginal. Utilizou-se, como estímulo doloroso agudo, a injeção intramuscular de vitamina K rotineira ao nascimento. Os recém-nascidos foram avaliados quanto à dor pela escala unidimensional Neonatal Facial Coding System e pela multidimensional COMFORT Behavior Scale (Comfort b), além da frequência cardíaca nos momentos antes, imediatamente após e 10 minutos após o estímulo. Foi utilizado teste t de Student para a análise estatística com significância de 5%. RESULTADOS: Foram avaliadas 83 crianças. A intensidade da dor avaliada por ambas as escalas antes do estímulo doloroso foi maior no grupo de recém-nascidos de cesariana, porém não foi estatisticamente significativa. Os valores da frequência cardíaca após o estímulo mostraram diferença estatisticamente significativa (p<0,05) maiores no grupo cesariana que no parto vaginal. CONCLUSÃO: Os dados obtidos não evidenciaram diferenças na percepção da dor entre recém-nascidos de parto vaginal e cesariana.

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: It is already known that the painful experiences to which the newborn is subjected may be related to future reactions and differences in the behavioral response to pain in newborns from different birth routes. This study aimed to evaluate the response to pain in infants born by cesarean section and vaginal delivery routes. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study. Newborns born at full term were allocated into two groups: cesarean section and vaginal delivery. The intramuscular vitamin K injection was performed as an acute pain stimulus because it is a routine injection at birth. The newborns were evaluated for pain on two scales, a one-dimensional, the Neonatal Facial Coding System, and a multidimensional, the COMFORT Behavior Scale (Comfort b), in addition to heart rate counting, moments before, immediately after and 10 minutes after the stimuli. Students t-test was used for statistical analyzes, and the level of significance was 5%. RESULTS: Eighty-three children were evaluated. The pain intensity assessed by both scales before the pain stimulus was higher in the cesarean section group, but not statistically significant. Heart rate values after the stimulus showed a statistically significant difference (p<0.05), higher in the cesarean section group than in the vaginal delivery. CONCLUSION: The results did not suggest that there are differences in the perception of pain among newborns born vaginally and cesarean section.

Resumo Introdução: A importância e os benefícios do aleitamento materno para os bebês e para as mães estão bem estabelecidos e documentados na literatura. No entanto, é frequente que mães lactantes precisem se submeter à anestesia geral ou raquianestesia e, devido à falta de informações, muitas delas interrompem a amamentação após a anestesia. Existem poucos dados disponíveis sobre a transferência de anestésicos para o leite materno. O objetivo desta revisão foi desenvolver algumas considerações e recomendações com base na literatura disponível. Métodos: Uma busca sistemática da literatura realizada usando com os seguintes bancos de dados em ciências da saúde: Embase, Lilacs, Pubmed, Scopus e Web of Science. A pesquisa bibliográfica mais recente foi realizada em 6 de abril de 2018. Uma pesquisa bibliográfica adicional foi realizada através do site da Organização Mundial da Saúde. Usamos os seguintes termos para a estratégia de busca: "Anestesia" e "Aleitamento materno" e seus derivados. Resultados: Nesta pesquisa, 599 registros foram encontrados e 549 foram excluídos por diferentes razões. Foram incluídos 50 manuscritos, com diferentes modelos de estudo: estudos prospectivos, estudos observacionais retrospectivos, revisões, relatos de casos, ensaios clínicos randômicos, caso-controle e acesso a sites. Pequenas concentrações da maioria dos agentes anestésicos são transferidas para o leite materno; entretanto, sua administração parece ser segura para mães lactantes quando administrados em dose única durante a anestesia e isso não deve contraindicar o aleitamento materno. Por outro lado, altas doses, administração contínua ou repetida dos fármacos aumentam o risco de efeitos adversos em neonatos e devem ser evitados. Poucas drogas, como diazepam e meperidina, produzem efeitos adversos em bebês amamentados, mesmo quando administradas em doses únicas. Dexmedetomidina parece ser segura se a amamentação começar 24 horas após a interrupção do medicamento. Conclusões: A maioria dos anestésicos é segura para mães que amamentam e oferecem baixo risco para os recém-nascidos amamentados quando a administração é em dose única. No entanto, altas doses e repetidas administrações de drogas aumentam significativamente o risco de efeitos adversos em recém-nascidos. Além disso, diazepam e meperidina devem ser evitados em mulheres que amamentam. Finalmente, anestesiologistas e pediatras devem considerar o risco-benefício individual, com atenção especial para os recém-nascidos prematuros ou bebês com doenças concomitantes, pois são mais suscetíveis a efeitos adversos.

Abstract Introduction: The importance and benefits of breastfeeding for the babies and mothers are well established and documented in the literature. However, it is frequent that lactating mothers need to undergo general or spinal anesthesia and, due to the lack of information, many of them interrupt breastfeeding after anesthesia. There are limited data available regarding anesthetics transfer to breast milk. This review aims to develop some considerations and recommendations based on available literature. Methods: A systematic search of the literature was conducted by using the following health science databases: Embase, Lilacs, Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The latest literature search was performed on April 6th, 2018. Additional literature search was made via the World Health Organization's website. We used the following terms for the search strategy: "Anesthesia" and "Breastfeeding", and their derivatives. Results: In this research, 599 registers were found, and 549 had been excluded by different reasons. Fifty manuscripts have been included, with different designs of studies: prospective trials, retrospective observational studies, reviews, case reports, randomized clinical trials, case–control, and website access. Small concentrations of the most anesthetic agents, are transferred to the breast milk; however, their administration seem to be safe for lactating mothers when administered as a single dose during anesthesia and this should not contraindicate the breastfeeding. On the other hand, high-doses, continuous or repeated administration of drugs increase the risk of adverse effects on neonates, and should be avoided. Few drugs, such as diazepam and meperidine, produce adverse effects on breastfed babies even in single doses. Dexmedetomidine seems to be safe if breastfeeding starts 24 h after discontinuation of the drug. Conclusions: Most of the anesthetic drugs are safe for nursing mothers and offer low risk to the breastfed neonates when administered in single-dose. However, high-dose and repeated administration of drugs significantly increase the risk of adverse effects on neonates. Moreover, diazepam and meperidine should be avoided in nursing women. Finally, anesthesiologists and pediatricians should consider individual risk/benefit, with special attention to premature neonates or babies with concurrent diseases since they are more susceptible to adverse effects.

Abstract Purpose To assess Cyclosporine A (CsA) therapy at an intraperitoneal dose of 15 mg.kg -1 in a rodent model of non-septic renal ischemia. Methods Twenty male Wistar rats were randomized to receive CsA therapy or none therapy before undergoing 30 minutes of renal ischemia followed by reperfusion. Additionally, 10 rats were randomized to undergo the same surgical procedure of the aforementioned animals with neither ischemia nor CsA therapy. Twelve hours after kidney ischemia, the left kidneys were evaluated for histological injury according to Park’s criteria. Serum creatinine (Cr), urea nitrogen (Ur) and sodium levels were obtained at different times of the experimental protocol. Results Rodents in the CsA group showed negative results (p<0.05) in serum variables (Cr: 0.41±0.05mg/dL vs . 4.17±1.25mg/dL; Ur: 40.90±3.98mg/dL vs . 187.70±22.93mg/dL) even the non CsA or control group (Cr: 0.35±0.07mg/dL vs . 3.80±1.20mg/dL; Ur: 40.10±4.70mg/dL vs . 184.50±49.80mg/dL). The negative results were also verified in histological evaluation, CsA group had 50% in the very severe grade of lesion, 10% in the severe and 40% in the moderate to severe whereas the control group had 90% in the very severe grade. Conclusion CsA was incapable of preventing the deleterious effects of ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat kidneys.